[1. NCRP Report No. 160: Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD (2009)]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Berrington de González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. The Lancet 2004; 363: 345-51.10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0]Search in Google Scholar
[3. European Commission. Council Directive 97/43/EURATOM of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the danger of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure (Official Journal of the European Commission, No- L 180). Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Orlando: Elsevier, published for the International Commission on Radiological Protection; 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. European Commission. European Commission guidance on estimating population doses from medical X-ray procedures (Radiation Protection No 154). Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Brugmans MJ, Buijs WC, Geleijns J, Lembrechts J. Population exposure to diagnostic use of ionizing radiation in The Netherlands. Health Phys 2002; 82: 500-9.10.1097/00004032-200204000-00009]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hart D, Wall BF. UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. EJR 2004; 50: 285-91.10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00178-5]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Wise KN, Thomson JEM. Changes in CT radiation doses in Australia from 1994 to 2002. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences 2004; 51: 81-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Shannoun F, Zeeb H, Back C, Blettner M. Medical exposure of the population from diagnostic use of ionizing radiation in Luxembourg between 1994 and 2002. Health Phys 2006; 91: 154-62.10.1097/01.HP.0000205237.00357.5816832196]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Mettler FA Jr, Thomadsen BR, Bhargavan M, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Lipoti AJ, et al. Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: Preliminary results. Health Physics 2008; 95: 502-7.10.1097/01.HP.0000326333.42287.a218849682]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Tung CJ1, Yang CH, Yeh CY, Chen TR. Population dose from medical diagnostic exposure in Taiwan. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011; 146: 248-51.10.1093/rpd/ncr16221502299]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Statistical office of the Republic of Slovenia. Slovenia in Figures 2012, Ljubljana: Littera picta d.o.o.; 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP. The 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Orlando: Elsevier, published for the International Commission on Radiological Protection; 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. DDM2 Project Report on European Population Dose Estimation. Draft report for internal use (http://ddmed.eu/); 2013. To be published by the European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. OECD iLibrary, Health at glance: Europe 2012: Medical Techniologies: CT scanners and MRI Units. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/9789264183896-en/03/04/index.html;jsessionid=2be6smve97uv8.x-oecd-live-02?contentType=&itemId=%2Fcontent%2Fchapter%2F9789264183896-31-en&mimeType=text%2Fhtml&containerItemId=%2Fcontent%2Fserial%2F23056088&accessItemIds=%2Fcontent%2Fbook%2F9789264183896-en (10.5.2014)]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Škrk D, Žontar D. Estimated collective effective dose to the population from nuclear medicine examinations in Slovenia. Radiol Oncol 2013; 47: 304-10.10.2478/raon-2013-0048379488724133396]Search in Google Scholar