[
1. Kim RY, Levy DS, Brascho DJ, Hatch KD. Uterine perforation during intracavitary application. Prognostic significance in carcinoma of the cervix. Radiology 1983; 147: 249-51.10.1148/radiology.147.1.6681912
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Corn BW, Shaktman BD, Lanciano RM, Hogan WM, Cater JR, Anderson L, et al. Intra- and perioperative complications associated with tandem and colpostat application for cervix cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 64: 224-9.10.1006/gyno.1996.4564
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Jhingran A, Eifel PJ. Perioperative and postoperative complications of intracavitary radiation for FIGO stage I-III carcinoma of the cervix. Int J RadiatOncol Biol Phys 2000; 46: 1177-83.10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00545-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Granai CO, Doherty F, Allee P, Ball HG, Madoc-Jones H, Curry SL. Ultrasound for diagnosing and preventing malplacement of intrauterine tandems. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 110-3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Matsuyama T, Tsukamoto N, Matsukuma K, Kamura T, Jingu K. Uterine perforation at the time of brachytherapy for the carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1986; 23: 205-11.10.1016/0090-8258(86)90225-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Barnes EA, Thomas G, Ackerman I, Barbera L, Letourneau, Lam K, et al. Prospective comparison of clinical and computed tomography assessment in detecting uterine perforation with intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007; 17: 821-6.10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00888.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Irvin W, Rice L, Taylor P, Anderson W, Schneider B. Uterine perforation at the time of brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90: 113-22.10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00230-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Milman RM, Goodman P. Uterine perforation by an intracavitary tandem: CT demonstration. Clin Imaging 1991; 15: 223-6.10.1016/0899-7071(91)90084-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Mills SE, Sugg NK, Mahnesmith RC. Endometrial carcinoma with pelvic involvement following uterine perforation. Diagn Gynecol Obstet 1981; 3: 149-54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Corn BW, Hanlon AL, Pajak TF, Owen J, Hanks GE. Technically accurate intracavitary insertions improve pelvic control among patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 53: 294-300.10.1006/gyno.1994.1137
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Petric P, Hudej R, Marolt-Music M. MRI-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Onkologija 2008; 12: 46-51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Petric P. Moving from 2D to 3D brachytherapy in gynecological tumors. JContemp Brachyther 2011; 3: 161-2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Petric P, Hudej R, Segedin B, Zobec Logar HB. MRI assisted treatment planning improves the DVH parameters in cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2011; 99: 264-5.10.1016/S0167-8140(11)70776-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Petric P, Hudej R, Rogelj P, Blas M, Segedin B, Zobec Logar HB, et al.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Comparison of 3D MRI with high sampling efficiency and 2D multiplanar MRI for contouring in cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiol Oncol 2012; 46:242-51.10.2478/v10019-012-0023-1347295323077463
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Petric P, Dimopoulos JCA, Kirisits C, Berger D, Hudej R, Pötter R. Inter- and intraobserver variation in HR-CTV contouring: intercomparison of transverse and paratransverse image orientation in 3D-MRI assisted cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2008; 89: 164-71.10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Haie-Meder C, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E, Briot E, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos JCA, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 2005; 74: 235-45.10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Pötter R, Haie-Mader C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol 2006; 78: 67-77.10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Petric P, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E, Haie-Meder C. Adaptive contouring of the target volume and organs at risk. In: Viswanathan AN, Kristis C, Erickson BE, Pötter R, editors. Gynecologic radiation therapy, novel approaches toimage-guidance and management. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2011. p. 99-118.10.1007/978-3-540-68958-4_9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Gerbaulet A, Pötter R, Haie-Meder C. Cervix cancer. In: Gerbaulet A, Pötter R, Mazeron JJ, Meertens H, Van Limbergen E, editors. The GEC ESTROhandbook of brachytherapy. Brussels: European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology; 2002. p. 301-63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Petric P, Hudej R, Marolt-Music M. MRI assisted cervix cancer brachytherapy pre-planning, based on insertion of the applicator in para-cervical anaesthesia: preliminary results of a prospective study. J Contemp Brachyther 2009; 1: 163-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Dimopoulos JCA, Kirisits C, Petric P, Georg P, Lang S, Berger D, et al. The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: clinical feasibility and preliminary results. Int J RadiatOncol Biol Phys 2006; 66: 83-90.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.041
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Petric P, Hudej R, Rogelj P, Lindegaard J, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, et al. Frequency-distribution mapping of HR CTV in cervix cancer: possibilities and limitations of existent and prototype applicators. Radiother Oncol 2010; 96: 70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Makin WP, Hunter, RD. CT scanning in intracavitary therapy: Unexpected findings in “straightforward” insertions. Radiother Oncol 1988; 13: 253-5.10.1016/0167-8140(88)90220-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Davidson MTM, Yuen J, D’Souza DP, Radwan JS, Hammond JA, Batchelar DL. Optimization of high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy applicator placement: The benefits of intraoperative ultrasound guidance. Brachytherapy 2008; 7: 248-53.10.1016/j.brachy.2008.03.00418635025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Brascho DJ. Use of pelvic pneumography in planning radiotherapy of endometrial carcinoma. Radiology 1970; 97: 113-20.10.1148/97.1.1135459343
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Scott WP. Tandem hysterography during intrauterine radium application. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1975; 124: 636-7.10.2214/ajr.124.4.6361163725
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Pötter R, Dimopoulos J, Georg P, Lang S, Waldhäusl C, Wachter-Gerstner N, et al. Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer. RadiotherOncol 2007; 83: 148-55.10.1016/j.radonc.2007.04.01217531904
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Haie-Meder C, Chargari C, Rey A, Dumas I, Morice P, Magné N. MRI-based low dose-rate brachytherapy experience in locally advanced cervical cancer patients initially treated by concomitant chemoradiotherapy. RadiotherOncol 2010; 96: 161-5.10.1016/j.radonc.2010.04.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. De Brabandere M, Mousa AG, Nulens A, Swinnen A, Van Limbergen E. Potential of dose optimisation in MRI-based PDR brachytherapy of cervix carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2008; 88: 217-26.10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Lindegaard JC, Tanderup K, Nielsen SK, Haack S, Gelineck J. MRI-guided 3D optimization significantly pmproves DVH Parameters of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol BiolPhys 2008; 71: 756-64.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Pötter R, Georg P, Dimopoulos J, Grimm M, Berger D, Nesvacil N, et al. Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100: 116-23.10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Tersteeg RJ, Roesink JM, Bijmolt S, Nomden CN, Moerland MA, et al. MRI-guided treatment-planning optimisation in intracavitary or combined intracavitary/interstitial PDR brachytherapy using tandem ovoid applicators in locally advanced cervical cancer. RadiotherOncol 2009; 93: 322-30.10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Granai CO, Allee P, Doherty F, Madoc-Jones H, Curry SL. Ultrasound used for assessing the in situ position of intrauterine tandems. Gynecol Oncol 1984; 18: 334-8.10.1016/0090-8258(84)90045-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Granai CO, Allee P, Doherty F, Ball HG, Madoc-Jones H, Curry SL. Intraperative real-time ultrasonography during intrauterine tandem placement. ObstetGynecol 1986; 67: 112-4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Wong F, Bhimji S. The usefulness of ultrasonography in intracavitary radiotherapy using selectron applicators. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 19: 477-82.10.1016/0360-3016(90)90560-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Tanaka S, Hishikawa Y, Kamikonya N, Miura T. Sonographic positioning of endouterine applicator. Radiat Med 1987; 5: 92-3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Fleischer AC, Burnett LS, Murray MJ, Jones HW. Intraoperative guidance for intrauterine procedures with transrectal sonography. Radiology 1990; 176: 576-7.10.1148/radiology.176.2.21955982195598
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Sharma DN, Rath GK, Thulkar S, Kumar S, Subramani V, Julka PK. Use of transrectal ultrasound for high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy for patients of carcinoma of uterine cervix. J Gynecol Oncol 2010; 21: 12-7.10.3802/jgo.2010.21.1.12284994220379442
]Search in Google Scholar
