[
1. Beatty, M., McCroskey, J. C., & Valencic, K. (2001). The biology of communic ation: A communication biological perspective. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Berger, C. R. & Burgoon M. (eds.), (1995). Communication and social influence processes. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, MI
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (2000). Looking in classrooms (8th ed.). New York: Harper & Row
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Burgoon, J. K. (1985). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds) Handbook of interpersonalcommunication (pp. 344390). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Bush, A. (1977, April). An empirical investigation of teacher clarity. Paper pres ented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association10.1177/002248717702800216
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Caliskan, N. & Karadag, E. (2006). Attention, communication and confusing dim ensions in the period of learning-teaching. Cagdas Egitim Dergisi. 31 (331), 25-31
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Celep, C. (2002). Classroom management and discipline. Ankara,Ani Publicati on
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Collier, M. J., & Powell, R. G. (1990). Ethnicity, instructional communication a nd classroom systems. Communication Quarterly, 38, 334–34910.1080/01463379009369771
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Darling, A. (1989). Signaling noncomprehensions in the classroom: Toward a d escriptive typology. Communication Education, 38, 34–4010.1080/03634528909378738
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Daly, J. A., & Friedrich, G. (1981). The development of communication appre hension: A retrospective analysis of contributory correlates. Communication Quart erly, 29, 243–25510.1080/01463378109369412
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Demirel, O., Seferoglu, S. & Yagci E. (2002). Teaching technologies and mate rial development. Ankara: Pegema
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Friedrich, G. (1982). Classroom interaction. In L. Barker (Ed.), Communicatio n in the classroom (pp. 55–76). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Goleman, D. (1997). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books10.1037/e538982004-001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Gill, M. M. (1994). Accent and stereotypes: Their effect on perceptions of teac hers and lecture comprehension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 348–36210.1080/00909889409365409
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Haslet, B. (1987). Communication, strategic action in context. Hillsdale, NJ: L awrence Erlbaum Associates
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Healy, J. M. (1998). Failure to connect. New York: Simon & Schuster
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Heather, C., Strawser, M. G. & George, S. (1995). Communication Education and International Audiences: Reflections on Instructional Challenges and Pedagogical Strategy in Journal of International Students
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Hewes, D. E. (ed.). (1995) The cognitive bases of interpersonal communication, Univ. of Minnesota, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, UK
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotiva ted: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–18010.3102/00346543070002151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Hines, C. V., Cruickshank, D. R., & Kennedy, J. J. (1985). Teacher clarity and its relationship to studentachievement and satisfaction. American Educational Res earch Journal, 22, 87–9910.3102/00028312022001087
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Jones, V.F. & Jones, L.S. (1997). Responsible classroom discipline: creating p ositive learning environmentsandsolving problems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publi cation
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Karadag, E. & Caliskan, N. (2009). Interaction and Communication in the Process of Education and Shared Common Area in the Classroom. In College Student Journal. Vol. 43. 1, March, 2009. p. 123, Project Innovation, Gale Group
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Knapp, M., & Hall, J. A. (1992). Nonverbal communication in human interacti on (3rd ed.). San Diego: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Lustig, M., & Koester, J. (1999). Intercultural competence. Menlo Park, CA: Longman
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Malcho, S. (2000). Body language. Giin Publication
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (2002). Willingness to communicate an d communication apprehensionin the classroom. In J. L. Chesbro & J. C. McCrosk ey (Eds.), Communication for teachers (pp. 19-34)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Allyn & Bacon, Boston
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. (1978). Community size as a predictor of d evelopment of communication apprehension: Replication and extension. Communi cation Monographs, 27, 212–219
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Mongeau, P. A., & Blalock, J. (1994). Student evaluations of instructor immed iacy and sexually harassing behaviors:An experimental investigation. Journal of A pplied Communication Research, 22,256–27210.1080/00909889409365401
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Nader, J. (1993). Meeting the needs of multicultural classrooms, family valnes and the motivatien of minotity students, devesity and teacling: teacher education y earbook. Texas: Jovanovich College Publications
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Powell, G. R. & Caseau, D. (2004). Classroom communication and diversity. Enhancing instructional practice. Fresno State University, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Rusu, Marinela (2015). Inteligenţa emoţională - Empatie şi comunicare interpersonală, Editura Universitas, Iaşi
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal tea cher immediacy onperceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the m ulticultural classroom. Communication Education, 39, 341–35310.1080/03634529009378814
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Yalin, H.I. (2001). Teaching technologies and material development. Ankara: Nobel Publication
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Wolvin, A. D., & Coakley, C. G. (1993). A listening typology. In D. Wolvin & C. G. Coakley (Eds.), Perspectives on listening (pp. 15–22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
]Search in Google Scholar
