Accès libre

Paradigms and Paradoxes in the Metamorphosis of Ecotourism

À propos de cet article

Citez

Fig. 1

Density of visitors in protected areas.Source: own calculations based on estimates from the National Strategy for Ecotourism Development in Romania 2019.
Density of visitors in protected areas.Source: own calculations based on estimates from the National Strategy for Ecotourism Development in Romania 2019.

Fig. 2

The multicriteria hierarchy of regions.Source: own calculations based on data provided by the National Institute of Statistics.
The multicriteria hierarchy of regions.Source: own calculations based on data provided by the National Institute of Statistics.

Fig. 3

Dynamics of accommodation capacity in regional profile.Source: own calculations based on data provided by the National Institute of Statistics.
Dynamics of accommodation capacity in regional profile.Source: own calculations based on data provided by the National Institute of Statistics.

Fig. 4

The evolution of tourist arrivals in regional profile.Source: own calculations based on data provided by the National Institute of Statistics.
The evolution of tourist arrivals in regional profile.Source: own calculations based on data provided by the National Institute of Statistics.

Fig. 5

Strengthening visions.
Strengthening visions.

Fig. 6

Principles of Vision 2024.
Principles of Vision 2024.

Typology of forms of involvement of local communities

Tosun typology 1999 Pretty typology 1995 Arnstein typology 1971

Manipulative

Passive

Consultation

For material incentives

Functional

Interactive

Automotive

Manipulation

Therapy

Information

Consultation

Reconciliation

Partnership

Delegated power

Citizen control

Coercive participationtop-down, passive, formal, mostly indirect, participation in implementation and sometimes in benefits, paternalism, manipulation, non-participation
Induced participationtop-down, passive, formal, mostly indirect, manipulation, pseudo-participation, participation in implementation and benefits, choice between proposed alternatives
Spontaneous participationtop-down, active participation, direct, involvement in decisions, genuine self-planning participation

SWOT analysis of ecotourism at the destination of Ţara Haţegului – Retezat and at the destination of the Central Balkans National Park (Bulgaria) presented in antithesis.

Ţara Haţegului – Retezat Central Balkan National Park
Strengths

Retezat National Park – the largest nature reserve in Romania;

on the territory of Retezat National Park there is the deepest glacial lake in Romania, Zănoaga Lake and the largest glacial lake, Bucura Lake;

Retezat National Park – the first park in the country accepted as a member of PAN Parks (European foundation that aims to promote national parks as ecotourism destinations);

areas on the territory of this destination have been included in the UNESCO list;

Dinosaurs Geopark Ţara Haţegului – UNESCO International Geopark, unique and remarkable land in Romania;

richness, uniqueness and diversity of the relief and the landscapes;

originality of the existing cultural heritage on the territory of the destination;

tourist routes that combine nature with geology, history, tradition and legends in the area;

development of tourism in the region by recognising Ţara Haţegului – Retezat as a tourist area, mountains, 38 diversified tourist routes, cultural and historical monuments, accommodation capacity.

the third largest protected nature reserve in Bulgaria;

unique nature and culture of local, regional, national and global importance;

favourable climate, relief and geographical location, which offers accessibility to natural and human resources;

comprehensive state policy for environmental management (Business concept for destination management for the Ecotourism Association in the city of Kalofer, Law for environmental protection, Strategy for cultural tourism, etc.);

Central Balkans National Park – became a member of PAN Parks and is also a PAN Parks certificate holder;

the national park and eight of the nine nature reserves are on the UN list of protected representative areas and four of the nature reserves are included in the World Network of Biosphere Reserves under the UNESCO Human and Biosphere Programme;

in 2006, the park was certified as a member of the Federation of European Wildlife and National Parks (EUROPARC);

in 2009, the National Park received the European Diploma in Protected Areas – the first and only in Bulgaria to receive the prestigious international award from the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on protected areas of special European importance for the conservation of biological, geological and landscape diversity – award that evaluates the quality of the natural heritage and the effectiveness of the protection and management system.

Weaknesses

poorly developed infrastructure: roads, water and sewerage networks, insufficient tourist routes, no natural gas supply network;

lack of public transport to allow tourists to travel to various tourist attractions;

surface and groundwater pollution;

insufficient promotion or lack of promotion of rural areas and specific products;

lack of centres of traditions and customs;

absence of regular cultural events;

absence of leisure infrastructure (leisure areas for all ages, children's playgrounds both outdoors and indoors, but also clubs, discos).

lack of experience in ministries for ecotourism development;

weaknesses in the mechanisms for imposing restrictions on negative impacts;

the existing infrastructure is not fully adequate;

insufficient services for visitors (small number of internet operators in rural areas, lack of road signs and signs in a foreign language, etc.);

poor quality of services in small villages due to lack of necessary qualifications and adequate education;

insufficient promotion of the region and the country as a tourist destination;

underdeveloped ecotourism products (underdeveloped market niches, insufficient loans of experience and foreign ideas).

Opportunities

the special and well individualized natural environment allows the development of tourism throughout a year;

destination development programme co-financed by a grant from Switzerland;

existence of the National Strategic Plan for Rural Development;

promoting local initiatives in tourism;

increasing financial support through European funds from the European Union for financing general and tourist infrastructure projects and environmental projects;

arousing an interest of other organisations for the exchange of good practices and experiences in the area;

promoting the culinary art specific to the area.

a means of stimulating the development of local communities;

possibility to comment on the lack of economic potential and economic activities in settlements where there are no basic production resources;

opportunity to improve sectoral employment of the population (balanced employment of male and female workers);

opportunity to multiply real jobs;

opportunity through ecotourism to create a complete national identity of the country in the marketing and advertising of Bulgarian destinations. Ecotourism is an opportunity to highlight Bulgaria's uniqueness for the development of new markets nationally and globally.

Threats

climate change;

inevitable natural hazards (danger of floods, falls of slopes, etc.);

water pollution due to uncontrolled discharge, but also lack of sewerage infrastructure in some communes;

irrational exploitation of resources and attitude of indifference to environmental protection;

migration of the labour force abroad, but also of tourists to better promoted areas.

competitive domestic state policy objectives (In Bulgaria there are competing reciprocal needs for state support and financing of social security systems and education, development and improvement of rural infrastructure. The need to prioritise objectives may hinder the development of ecotourism);

natural disasters;

terrorism;

investment risk.

Indicators for capitalising on rural tourism and ecotourism potential in 2020.

Indicator UM Romania Ţara Haţegului – Retezat Percentage out of total
Tourist reception structures with tourist accommodation functions Number 8,610 313 3.64
Existing tourist accommodation capacity Places 358,119 8,531 2.38
Tourist accommodation capacity in operation Places – days 88,789,656 1,723,402 1.94
Tourist arrivals Number 13,374,943 194,245 1.45
Overnights Number 30,086,091 383,496 1.27
eISSN:
2081-6383
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Geosciences, Geography