This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Public License.
Borzaga C., Galera G., 2016. Innovating the provision of welfare services through collective action: The case of Italian social cooperatives. International Review of Sociology 26: 31–47. DOI 10.1080/03906701.2016.1148336.BorzagaC.GaleraG.2016Innovating the provision of welfare services through collective action: The case of Italian social cooperatives26314710.1080/03906701.2016.1148336Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Campos Franco R., 2005. Defining the nonprofit sector: Portugal. Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project. No. 43. The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, Baltimore.Campos FrancoR.2005Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project. No. 43The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society StudiesBaltimoreSearch in Google Scholar
Cebotari S., Mihály M., 2018. Towards a progressive local development approach: Insights from local community initiatives in Hungary and Romania. In: Görmar F., Lang T. (eds), Regional and local development in times of polarisation. Palgrave Macmillan, Berlin Heidelberg, New York: 253–285.CebotariS.MihályM.2018Towards a Progressive Local Development Approach: Insights from Local Community Initiatives in Hungary and RomaniaIn:GörmarF.LangT.(eds),Palgrave MacmillanBerlin Heidelberg, New York25328510.1007/978-981-13-1190-1_11Search in Google Scholar
De Bruin A., Shaw E., Lewis K.V., 2017. The collaborative dynamic in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 29: 575–585. DOI 10.1080/08985626.2017.1328902.De BruinA.ShawE.LewisK.V.2017The collaborative dynamic in social entrepreneurship2957558510.1080/08985626.2017.1328902Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Defourny J., Nyssens M., 2012. The EMES approach of social enterprise in a comparative perspective. EMES Working Papers no. 12/03. DOI 10.4324/9780203487747-11.DefournyJ.NyssensM.2012EMES Working Papers no. 12/03.10.4324/9780203487747-11Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
European Commission, 2019a. Regional innovation monitor plus. Alentejo region of Portugal. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/regional-innovation-monitor/base-profile/alentejo-region-portugal (accessed: 2 July 2020).European Commission2019aAlentejo region of Portugal. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/regional-innovation-monitor/base-profile/alentejo-region-portugal (accessed: 2 July 2020).Search in Google Scholar
European Commission, 2019b. Regional innovation monitor plus. Brandenburg. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/regional-innovation-monitor/base-profile/brandenburg (accessed: 2 July 2020).European Commission2019bBrandenburgOnline: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/regional-innovation-monitor/base-profile/brandenburg (accessed: 2 July 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Eurostat, 2019. Rural development data. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/rural-development/data (accessed: 2 July 2019).Eurostat2019Online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/rural-development/data (accessed: 2 July 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Flick U., 2006. An introduction to qualitative research, 3rd Ed. Sage Publications, London; Thousand Oaks, California.FlickU.20063rd Ed.Sage Publications, LondonThousand Oaks, CaliforniaSearch in Google Scholar
Geiselhardt K., Hoppe-Seyler A., Werner C., 2019. Vom Absetzen theoretischer Brillen und der Öffnung des eigenen Blicks – Reflexionen über praxeologische Methodologien (On removing theoretical lenses and opening the sight – reflections about praxeological methodologies). In: Schäfer S., Everts J. (eds), Handbuch Praktiken Und Raum: Humangeographie Nach Dem Practice Turn (Handbook practices and space: Human geography after the practice turn). Transcript, Bielefeld: 361–390.GeiselhardtK.Hoppe-SeylerA.WernerC.2019Vom Absetzen theoretischer Brillen und der Öffnung des eigenen Blicks – Reflexionen über praxeologische Methodologien (On removing theoretical lenses and opening the sight – reflections about praxeological methodologies)In:SchäferS.EvertsJ.(eds),(Handbook practices and space: Human geography after the practice turn).TranscriptBielefeld36139010.1515/9783839446034-015Search in Google Scholar
Haunstein S., 2019. Bürgerschaftliche Verantwortungsübernahme in ländlich-peripheren Räumen. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung am Beispiel genossenschaftliche Dorfläden (Citizen responsibility in rural-peripheral spaces. A critical debate based on the example of co-operative village shops). In: Mießner M., Naumann M. (eds), Kritische Geographien Ländlicher Entwicklung: Globale Transformationen und lokale Herausforderungen (Critical geographies of rural development: Global transformations and local challenges). Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster: 266–278.HaunsteinS.2019Bürgerschaftliche Verantwortungsübernahme in ländlich-peripheren Räumen. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung am Beispiel genossenschaftliche Dorfläden (Citizen responsibility in rural-peripheral spaces. A critical debate based on the example of co-operative village shops)In:MießnerM.NaumannM.(eds),(Critical geographies of rural development: Global transformations and local challenges).Westfälisches DampfbootMünster266278Search in Google Scholar
Henriques J.A., 2013. Os sistemas de financiamento das IPSS e a sua relação com o Estado Providência em Portugal (Financing systems of IPSS′ and their relation to the welfare state in Portugal). PhD thesis, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa. Online: https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/handle/10071/7659 (accessed: 12 July 2020).HenriquesJ.A.2013(Financing systems of IPSS′ and their relation to the welfare state in Portugal). PhD thesis,Instituto Universitário de LisboaOnline: https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/handle/10071/7659 (accessed: 12 July 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Hirvilammi T., Joutsenvirta M., 2019. Diverse work practices and the role of welfare institutions. In: Eskelinen T., Venäläinen J., Hirvilammi T. (eds), Enacting community economies within a welfare state. Mayfly Books: 47–71.HirvilammiT.JoutsenvirtaM.2019Diverse work practices and the role of welfare institutionsIn:EskelinenT.VenäläinenJ.HirvilammiT.(eds),Mayfly Books4771Search in Google Scholar
Houtbeckers E., 2017. The everyday experiences of a sustainable entrepreneur: Brokering for social innovation at the intersection of networks of practice. In: Nicolopoulou K., Karataş-Özkan M., Janssen F. (eds), Sustainable entrepreneurship and social innovation. Routledge, London; New York: 320–337HoutbeckersE.2017The everyday experiences of a sustainable entrepreneur: Brokering for social innovation at the intersection of networks of practiceIn:NicolopoulouK.Karataş-ÖzkanM.JanssenF.(eds),RoutledgeLondon; New York320337Search in Google Scholar
Kasabov E., 2016. Investigating difficulties and failure in early-stage rural cooperatives through a social capital lens. European Urban and Regional Studies 23: 895–916. DOI 10.1177/0969776415587121.KasabovE.2016Investigating difficulties and failure in early-stage rural cooperatives through a social capital lens2389591610.1177/0969776415587121Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kleinhans R., 2017. False promises of co-production in neighbourhood regeneration: The case of Dutch community enterprises. Public Management Review 19: 1500–1518. DOI 10.1080/14719037.2017.1287941.KleinhansR.2017False promises of co-production in neighbourhood regeneration: The case of Dutch community enterprises191500151810.1080/14719037.2017.1287941Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Knoblauch H., 2001. Fokussierte Ethnographie: Soziologie, Ethnologie und die neue Welle der Ethnographie (Focused ethnography: Sociology, ethnology and the new wave of ethnography). Sozialer Sinn 1(2): 123–141. DOI 10.1515/sosi-2001-0105.KnoblauchH.2001Fokussierte Ethnographie: Soziologie, Ethnologie und die neue Welle der Ethnographie (Focused ethnography: Sociology, ethnology and the new wave of ethnography)1212314110.1515/sosi-2001-0105Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kovanen S., in press. Social entrepreneurship as a collaborative practice: Literature review and research agenda. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation.KovanenS.in press.Social entrepreneurship as a collaborative practice: Literature review and research agenda10.7341/20211713Search in Google Scholar
Kumpulainen K., Soini K., 2019. How do community development activities affect the construction of rural places? A case study from Finland. Sociologia Ruralis 59: 294–313. DOI 10.1111/soru.12234.KumpulainenK.SoiniK.2019How do community development activities affect the construction of rural places? A case study from Finland5929431310.1111/soru.12234Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lang T., 2018. Learning by doing. Herausforderungen und Methoden transnational vergleichender Forschung (Learning by doing. Challenges and methods of transnational comparative research). In: Meyer F., Miggelbrink J., Beurskens K. (eds), Ins Feld und zurück – Praktische Probleme qualitativer Forschung in der Sozialgeographie (To the field and back – practical challenges of qualitative research in social geography). Springer, Berlin: 45–53. DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-55198-1_6.LangT.2018Learning by doing. Herausforderungen und Methoden transnational vergleichender Forschung (Learning by doing. Challenges and methods of transnational comparative research)In:MeyerF.MiggelbrinkJ.BeurskensK.(eds),(To the field and back – practical challenges of qualitative research in social geography).SpringerBerlin455310.1007/978-3-662-55198-1_6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Landesamt für Bauen und Verkehr, 2015. Kreisprofil Märkisch-Oderland 2015. Berichte der Raumbeobachtung. Landesamt für Bauen und Verkehr, Hoppegarten (County profile Märkisch-Oderland 2015. Reports of spatial observation. State office for construction and traffic) Online: https://lbv.brandenburg.de/dateien/stadt_wohnen/_KP17_64_MOL.pdf (accessed: 1 October 2020).Landesamt für Bauen und Verkehr2015Kreisprofil Märkisch-Oderland2015Landesamt für Bauen und VerkehrHoppegarten(County profile Märkisch-Oderland 2015. Reports of spatial observation. State office for construction and traffic) Online: https://lbv.brandenburg.de/dateien/stadt_wohnen/_KP17_64_MOL.pdf (accessed: 1 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Landtag Brandenburg, 2019. Abschlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission 6/1. Schriften des Landtages Brandenburg Heft 2/2019 (Final report of the Enquete-commission 6/1. Publications of the state parliament of Brandenburg, issue 2/2019). Landtag Brandenburg, Potsdam. Online: https://www.dvgw.de/medien/dvgw/regional/bb/pdf/News/Abschlussbericht_Enquete-Kommission_6_1_Finalfassung.pdf (accessed: 1 October 2020).Landtag Brandenburg2019Abschlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission 6/1(Final report of the Enquete-commission 6/1. Publications of the state parliament of Brandenburg, issue 2/2019).Landtag BrandenburgPotsdamOnline: https://www.dvgw.de/medien/dvgw/regional/bb/pdf/News/Abschlussbericht_Enquete-Kommission_6_1_Finalfassung.pdf (accessed: 1 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Matthies A.-L., Stamm I., Hirvilammi T., Närhi K., 2019. Ecosocial innovations and their capacity to integrate ecological, economic and social sustainability transition. Sustainability 11: 2107. DOI 10.3390/su11072107.MatthiesA.-L.StammI.HirvilammiT.NärhiK.2019Ecosocial innovations and their capacity to integrate ecological, economic and social sustainability transition11210710.3390/su11072107Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Noack A., Federwisch T., 2019. Social innovation in rural regions: Urban impulses and cross-border constellations of actors. Sociologia Ruralis 59: 92–112. DOI 10.1111/soru.12216.NoackA.FederwischT.2019Social innovation in rural regions: Urban impulses and cross-border constellations of actors599211210.1111/soru.12216Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nunes Silva C., 2017. Political and administrative decentralization in Portugal: Four decades of democratic local government. In: Nunes Silva C., Buček J. (eds), Local government and urban governance in Europe. Springer International Publishing, Cham: 9–32.Nunes SilvaC.2017Political and administrative decentralization in Portugal: Four decades of democratic local governmentIn:Nunes SilvaC.BučekJ.(eds),Springer International PublishingCham93210.1007/978-3-319-43979-2_2Search in Google Scholar
Paech N., Rommel M., Sperling C., 2019. Transformatives Größenmanagement. Wie lassen sich transformative Wirtschaftsformen wirtschaftlich und sozial stabilisieren? (Transformative growth management. How can transformative enterprise forms become socially and economically stable?) In: Antoni-Komar I., Kropp C., Paech N., Pfriem R. (eds), Transformative Unternehmen und die Wende in der Ernährungswirtschaft. (Transformative enterprises and the transformation in the food industry). Metropolis, Marburg: 129–157.PaechN.RommelM.SperlingC.2019Transformatives Größenmanagement. Wie lassen sich transformative Wirtschaftsformen wirtschaftlich und sozial stabilisieren? (Transformative growth management. How can transformative enterprise forms become socially and economically stable?)In:Antoni-KomarI.KroppC.PaechN.PfriemR.(eds),(Transformative enterprises and the transformation in the food industry).MetropolisMarburg129157Search in Google Scholar
Richter R., 2017. Rural social enterprises as embedded intermediaries: The innovative power of connecting rural co mmunities with supra-regional networks. Journal of Rural Studies 70: 179–187. DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.005.RichterR.2017Rural social enterprises as embedded intermediaries: The innovative power of connecting rural co mmunities with supra-regional networks7017918710.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Roberts J., 2006. Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies 43: 623–639. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00618.x.RobertsJ.2006Limits to communities of practice4362363910.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00618.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rossel C., 2015. State and SSE partnerships in social policy and welfare regimes: The case of Uruguay. In: Utting P. (ed.), Social and solidarity economy beyond the fringe. Zed Books, London: 236–249.RosselC.2015State and SSE partnerships in social policy and welfare regimes: The case of UruguayIn:UttingP.(ed.),Zed BooksLondon23624910.5040/9781350222618.ch-013Search in Google Scholar
Salemink K., Strijker D., Bosworth G., 2017. The community reclaims control? Learning experiences from rural broadband initiatives in the Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis 57: 555–575. DOI 10.1111/soru.12150.SaleminkK.StrijkerD.BosworthG.2017The community reclaims control? Learning experiences from rural broadband initiatives in the Netherlands5755557510.1111/soru.12150Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
von Friedrichs Y., Lundström A., 2016. Social entrepreneurship as collaborative processes in rural Sweden. In: Lundgaard Andersen L., Gawell M., Spear R. (eds), Social entrepreneurship and social enterprises: Nordic perspectives. Routledge, New York: 158–177.von FriedrichsY.LundströmA.2016Social entrepreneurship as collaborative processes in rural SwedenIn:LundgaardAndersen L.GawellM.SpearR.(eds),RoutledgeNew York158177Search in Google Scholar
Wallace B., 2005. Exploring the meaning(s) of sustainability for community-based social entrepreneurs. Social Enterprise Journal 1: 78–89. DOI 10.1108/17508610580000708.WallaceB.2005Exploring the meaning(s) of sustainability for community-based social entrepreneurs1788910.1108/17508610580000708Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vallance S., Perkins H.C., Dixon J.E., 2011. What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum 42: 342–348. DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002.VallanceS.PerkinsH.C.DixonJ.E.2011What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts4234234810.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van Twuijver M.W., Olmedo L., O’Shaughnessy, M., Hennessy T., 2020. Rural social enterprises in Europe: A systematic literature review. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 35: 121–142. DOI 10.1177/0269094220907024.van TwuijverM.W.OlmedoL.O’ShaughnessyM.HennessyT.2020Rural social enterprises in Europe: A systematic literature review3512114210.1177/0269094220907024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wenger E., 2010. Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In: Blackmore C. (ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice. Springer, London: 179–198. DOI 10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_7.WengerE.2010Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a conceptIn:BlackmoreC.(ed.),SpringerLondon17919810.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wenger E., 2008. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, 16th pr. Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.WengerE.200816th pr. Ed.Cambridge University PressCambridgeSearch in Google Scholar
Whitelaw S., Hill C., 2013. Achieving sustainable social enterprises for older people: Evidence from a European project. Social Enterprise Journal 9: 269–292. DOI 10.1108/SEJ-05-2012-0016.WhitelawS.HillC.2013Achieving sustainable social enterprises for older people: Evidence from a European project926929210.1108/SEJ-05-2012-0016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar