[
1. M. A. Duggan, W. F. Anderson, S. Altekruse, L. Penberthy, and M. E. Sherman, “The Surveil-lance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and Pathology,” Am. J. Surg. Pathol., vol. 40, no. 12, pp. e94–e102, 2016, doi: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000749.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
2. J. Gandhi et al., “Population-based study demonstrating an increase in colorectal cancer in young patients,” Br. J. Surg., vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 1063–1068, 2017, doi: 10.1002/bjs.10518.28378448
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
3. F. G. Campos, A. Habr-Gama, S. C. Nahas, and R. O. Perez, “Abdominoperineal excision: Evolution of a centenary operation,” Dis. Colon Rectum, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 844–853, 2012, doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825ab0f7.22810469
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
4. E. Rullier et al., “Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer,” Dis. Colon Rectum, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1168–1175, 1999, doi: 10.1007/BF02238569.10496557
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
5. R. J. Heald, R. K. Smedh, A. Kald, R. Sexton, and B. J. Moran, “Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum--an endangered operation. Norman Nigro Lectureship.,” Dis. Colon Rectum, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 747–51, 1997, [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9221846.10.1007/BF020554259221846
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. G. Jurell and J. Lagergren, “Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer,” pp. 232–238, 2007, doi: 10.1002/bjs.5489.17143848
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
7. J. G. Han, Z. J. Wang, G. H. Wei, Z. G. Gao, Y. Yang, and B. C. Zhao, “Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer,” Am. J. Surg., vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 274–282, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.001.22920402
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
8. Sayers, A E et al. “Perineal hernia formation following extralevator abdominoperineal excision.” Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland vol. 17,4 (2015): 351-5. doi: 10.1111/codi.1284325413255
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
9. A. Huang, H. Zhao, and T. Ling, “Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection : a meta-analysis,” pp. 321–327, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1794-6.24385025
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
10. D. Asplund, E. Haglind, and E. Angenete, “Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery : results from a single centre,” pp. 1191–1196, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02930.x.22221401
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
11. A. Carpelan, “Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer : a retrospective study with long-term follow-up,” 2018.10.1007/s00384-018-2977-y29445870
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. A. N. D. Study, “ExtraLevatory AbdominoPerineal Excision (ELAPE) Does Not Result in Reduced Rate of Tumor Perforation or Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin,” vol. 261, no. 5, pp. 933–938, 2015, doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000910.25211268
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
13. A. Hussain, F. Mahmood, A. D. W. Torrance, H. Clarke, C. Howitt, and R. Dawson, “Oncological outcomes of abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of low rectal cancer : A retrospective review of a single UK tertiary centre experience,” Ann. Med. Surg., vol. 34, no. June, pp. 28–33, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.06.007.612580230191062
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
14. Tao, Yu et al. “Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: Where to go.” World journal of gastroenterology vol. 26,22 (2020): 3012-3023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26. i22.3012
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
15. X. Qi et al., “Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer : a meta-analysis,” vol. 0, no. 20, pp. 2446–2456, 2019, doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000485.683105931651517
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
16. A. Bradley, A. Hammad, and A. Mukherjee, “Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (Elape): A retrospective cohort study,” vol. 10, pp. 32–35, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.016.497122927508080
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
17. L. Felipe, D. C. E. Aleman, and B. B. Vailati, “Extralevator Abdominal Perineal Excision Versus Standard Abdominal Perineal Excision : Impact on Quality of the Resected Specimen and Postoperative Morbidity,” no. 2, pp. 2–9, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3963-1.28265736
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
18. G. Papp, K. Dede, and A. Bursics, “Short-term advantages of ELAPE over APR,” Acta Chir. Belg., vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 327–332, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00015458.2020.1778265.32496868
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
19. M. Nyandowe, A. Egedovo, and Y.-H. Ho, “A comparative study of standard versus extralevator abdominoperineal resections,” Int. Surg. J., vol. 4, no. 4, p. 1222, 2017, doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170921.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
20. D. Kamali, A. Sharpe, A. Musbahi, and A. Reddy, “Oncological and quality of life outcomes following extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer,” pp. 402–409, 2017, doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0038.544970528462642
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
21. Z. Shen et al., “Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer,” vol. 41, pp. 472–477, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.017.25659773
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
22. Colov, Emilie P et al. “Wound Complications and Perineal Pain After Extralevator Versus Standard Abdominoperineal Excision: A Nationwide Study.” Diseases of the colon and rectum vol. 59,9 (2016): 813-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.000000000000063927505109
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
23. H. Zhang et al., “Long-term outcomes after extra-levator versus conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer,” BMC Surg., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01692-y.921912035733206
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar