[1. Tu, T.N., et al., Numerical Study on the Influence of Trim On Ship Resistance In Trim Optimization Process. Naval Engineers Journal, 2018. 130(4): p. 133–142.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Villa, D., S. Gaggero, and S. Brizzolara. Ship Self Propulsion with different CFD methods: from actuator disk to viscous inviscid unsteady coupled solvers. in The10th International Conference on Hydrodynamics. 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Pacuraru, F., A. Lungu, and O. Marcu. Self-Propulsion Simulation of a Tanker Hull. in AIP Conference Proceedings. 2011. AIP.10.1063/1.3636699]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Win, Y.N., et al., Computation of propeller-hull interaction using simple body-force distribution model around Series 60 CB= 0.6. Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, 2013. 18: p. 17–27.10.2534/jjasnaoe.18.17]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bugalski, T. and P. Hoffmann. Numerical simulation of the self-propulsion model tests. in Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors smp. 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Bekhit, A. Numerical simulation of the ship self-propulsion prediction using body force method and fully discretized propeller model. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. IOP Publishing.10.1088/1757-899X/400/4/042004]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Seo, J.H., et al., Flexible CFD meshing strategy for prediction of ship resistance and propulsion performance. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2010. 2(3): p. 139–145.10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0030]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Gokce, M.K., O.K. Kinaci, and A.D. Alkan, Self-propulsion estimations for a bulk carrier. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2018: p. 1–8.10.1080/17445302.2018.1544108]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Tran Ngoc Tu, N.M.C., Comparison Of Different Approaches For Calculation Of Propeller Open Water Characteristic Using RANSE Method. Naval Engineers Journal, 2018. Volume 130, Number 1, 1 March 2018, pp. 105–111(7).]Search in Google Scholar
[10. http://www.t2015.nmri.go.jp/jbc_gc.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. http://www.t2015.nmri.go.jp/Instructions_JBC/instruction_JBC.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. ITTC 2011b Recommended procedures and guidelines 7.5-03-02-03.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. CD-ADAPCO. User Guide STAR-CCM+, Version 13.02. 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Baltazar, J.M., D.R. Rijpkema, and J. Falcao De Campos. Numerical studies for verification and validation of open-water propeller RANS computations. in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering (Rome, Italy). 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. https://www.ittc.info/media/8169/75-03-03-01.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Chen, Z., CFD investigation in scale effects on propellers with different blade area ratio. 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Wilcox, D.C., Turbulence modeling for CFD. Vol. 2. 1998: DCW industries La Canada, CA.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. ITTC-Quality Manual 7.5-03-01-01, 2008.10.19129/sbad.123]Search in Google Scholar
[19. https://ittc.info/media/1587/75-02-03-011.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Molland, A.F., S.R. Turnock, and D.A. Hudson, Ship resistance and propulsion. 2017: Cambridge university press.10.1017/9781316494196]Search in Google Scholar
[21. http://www.t2015.nmri.go.jp/Presentations/Day1-AM2-JBC-TestData1-Hirata.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
