À propos de cet article

Citez

1. Aon, M.A, Colaneri, A.C.(2001). II. Temporal and spatial evolution of enzymatic activities and physico-chemical properties in an agricultural soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 18(3), 255-270. Retrieved 10 September, 2013, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00161-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00161-5.10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00161-5Search in Google Scholar

2. Bloem, J., Schouten, A. J., Sorensen, S. J., Rutgers, M., Werf, A., Breure, A. M. (2005). Monitoring and evaluating soil quality. In Bloem J. et al. (Eds). Microbiological Methods for Assessing Soil Quality (pp. 23-36). Wallingford, CABI Publishing.10.1079/9780851990989.0023Search in Google Scholar

3. Brooke, P. (2001). The soil microbial biomass: concept, measurement and applications in soil ecosystem research. Microbes and Environments, 16, 131-140.10.1264/jsme2.2001.131Search in Google Scholar

4. Burns, R. G., Nannipieri, P., Benedetti, A., Hopkins, D.W. (2005). Defining Soil Quality. In Bloem J. et al. (Eds). Microbiological Methods for Assessing Soil Quality (pp. 15-22). Wallingford, CABI Publishing.10.1079/9780851990989.0015Search in Google Scholar

5. Canellas, L. P., Olivare,s F. L., Okorokova- Façanha, A. L. and Rocha, A. (2002). Humic Acids Isolated from Earthworm Compost Enhance Root Elongation, Lateral Root Emergence, and Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase Activity in Maize Roots. Plant Physiology, 130(4), 1951-1957.10.1104/pp.00708816670512481077Search in Google Scholar

6. Chen, W., Hoitink, A. J., Schmitthenner, A. F., Tuovinen, O. H. (1998). The role of microbial activity in suspension of damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology, 78, 314-322.10.1094/Phyto-78-314Search in Google Scholar

7. Dobbss, L.B., Canellas, P.L., Lopes, O.F., Oliveira, A.N., Pres, A.N., Azevedo, M., Spaccini, R., Piccolo, A., Facanha, A. (2012). Bioactivity of chemically transformed humic matter from vermicompost on plant root growth. J.Agric.Food Chem., 58(6): 3681 - 3688.Search in Google Scholar

8. Dubova, L., Alsiņa, I., Šteinberga, V. (2012). Comparison of Trichoderma sp. use efficiency on cucumbers and lettuce, Scientific Papers. Series B. Horticulture, 56, 101-104.Search in Google Scholar

9. Fogarty, W. M., Ward, J. A. (1970). The influence of peat extract on Clostridium acetobutylicum. Plant and Soil, 32, 534-537.10.1007/BF01372891Search in Google Scholar

10. Gamaley, A. V., Nadporozhskaya, M. A., Popov, A. I., Chertov, O. G., Kovsh, N. V., Gromova, O. A. (2001). Non-root nutrition with vermicompost extracts as the way of ecological optimisation. In Horst W.J.(Eds). Plant nutrition-Food security and sustainability of agro-ecosystems (pp. 862-863). Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/0-306-47624-X_420Search in Google Scholar

11. Kaimi, E., Mukaidami, T., Tamaki, M. (2007). Screening of Twelf Plant Species for Phytoremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon- Contaminated Soil. Plant Production Science, 10, 211-218.10.1626/pps.10.211Search in Google Scholar

12. Kennedy, A.C., Stubbs, L.T., Schillinger, W.F. (2004). Soil and Crop Management Effects on Soil Microbiology. In Magdoff F. and Weil R.R. (Eds). Soil organic matter in Sustainable Agriculture (pp. 295-326). CRC Press.10.1201/9780203496374.ch10Search in Google Scholar

13. Nawaz, N. and Gunasekaran, M. (1988). Effect of peat extract on the hydrolytic enzymes of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1, 197-205.10.1016/0921-3449(88)90016-XSearch in Google Scholar

14. Parmar, N. and Dardarwal, K. R. (1999). Stimulation of nitrogen fixation and induction of flavonoid like compounds by rhizobacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 86, 36-44.10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00634.xSearch in Google Scholar

15. Pell, M., Stenström, J. and Granhall, U. (2005). Soil respiration. In Bloem J. et al. (Eds). Microbiological Methods for Assessing Soil Quality (pp. 117-126). Wallingford, CABI Publishing.10.1079/9780851990989.0117Search in Google Scholar

16. Schiavon, M., Pizzeghello, D., Muscolo, A., Vaccaro, S., Francioso, O. and Nardi, S. (2010). High Molecular Size Humic Substances Enhance Phenylpropanoid Metabolism in Maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36, 662-669.10.1007/s10886-010-9790-6Search in Google Scholar

17. Sturz, A. V.and Christie, B. R. (2003). Beneficial microbial allelopathies in the root zone: the management of soil quality and plant disease with rhizobacteria. Soil and Tillage Research, 72, 107-123.10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00082-5Search in Google Scholar

18. Tarnawski, M, Depta, K, Grejciun, D. and Szelepin, B. (2006). HPLC determination of phenolic acids and antioxidant activity in concentrated peat extract- a natural immunomodulator. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 41(1), 182-188.10.1016/j.jpba.2005.11.01216368219Search in Google Scholar

19. Trevisan, S., Francioso, O., Quaggiott,i S.and Nardi, S. (2010). Humic substances biological activity at the plant-soil interface. Plant Signalling and Behaviour, 5(6), 635-643.10.4161/psb.5.6.11211300155120495384Search in Google Scholar

20. Warman, P. R. and AngLopez, M. J. (2010). Vermicompost derived from different feedstocks as a plant growth medium. Bioresource Technology, 101, 4479-4483.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.09820153632Search in Google Scholar

21. Zaller, J. G. (2002). Foliar Spraying of Vermicompost extracts: Effects on Fruit Quality and Indications of late-Blight Suppression of Field-Grown Tomatoes. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 24, 165-180.Search in Google Scholar

22. Zydlik, Z. and Zydlik, P. (2013). The effect of microbiological products on soil properties in the conditions of replant disease. Zemdirbyste- Agriculture, 100(1), 19-24.10.13080/z-a.2013.100.003Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2255-8535
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
2 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Life Sciences, Biotechnology, Plant Science, Ecology