[
Beck Nielsen, S. (2014). Medical record keeping as an interactional accomplishment. Pragmatics and Society, 5(2), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.2.03nie.10.1075/ps.5.2.03nie
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beck Nielsen, S. (2016). How doctors manage consulting computer records while interacting with patients. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.112645110.1080/08351813.2016.1126451
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beck Nielsen, S. (2019). Making a glance an action: Doctors’ quick looks at their destop computer screens. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.02110.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Gendron, M. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54(4), 927–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.02410.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clift, R. (2016). Conversation analysis. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.10.1017/9781139022767
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. (2012). Mimesis and language: A distributed view. Interaction Studies, 13(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.13.1.02cow10.1075/is.13.1.02cow
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duncan, J. (1979). Divided attention: The whole is more than the sum of its parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(2), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.5.2.21610.1037/0096-1523.5.2.216
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ewolds, H., Broeker, L., de Oliveira, R. F., Raab, M., & Künzell, S. (2021). Ways to improve multitasking: Effects of predictability after single- and dual-task training. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.14210.5334/joc.142
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fox, B. A. & Thompson, S. A. (2010). Responses to wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(2), 133– 156. https://doi.org/10.1080/0835181100375168010.1080/08351811003751680
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk. Response tokens and listener stance. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.9210.1075/pbns.92
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. Notes on the social organization of gatherings. The Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Pantheon Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
González Martínez, E. (2006). The interweaving of talk and text in a French criminal pretrial hearing. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(3), 229–261. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_310.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121.). Irvington Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3-4), 272–302.10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greatbatch, D. (2006). Prescriptions and prescribing: Co-ordinating talk and text-based activities. In J. Heritage & D. W. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 313–339). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haddington, P. (2019). Leave-taking as multiactivity: Coordinating conversational closings with driving in cars. Language & Communication, 65, 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.00310.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2014). Multiactivity in social interaction: beyond multitasking. John Benjamins.10.1075/z.187
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halldorsdottir, I. (2006). Orientations to law, guidelines, and codes in lawyer– client interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(3), 263– 301. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_410.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hazel, P. & Mortensen, K. (2014). Embodying the institution – Object manipulation in developing interaction in study counselling meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 10–29. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.01610.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinemann, T. (2017). Receipting answers that are counter to expectations: The polar question-answer-nå sequence in Danish. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(3), 249–267, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351813
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinemann, T., & Steensig, J. (2018). Justifying departures from progressivity: The Danish turn-initial particle ’altså’. In J. Heritage & M. L. Sorjonen (Eds.), In between turn and sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages (pp. 445– 476). John Benjamins https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31.15hei.2017.1340705
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (2016). Turning down sound to turn to talk: Muting and muffling auditory objects as a resource for displaying involvement. Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 17, 1–28. https://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2016/gaheinemann.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis. Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jensen, T. W. (2014). Emotion in languaging: Languaging as affective, adaptive, and flexible behavior in social interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.0072010.3389/fpsyg.2014.00720
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jensen, T. W. (2018). Humor as interactional affordances: An ecological perspective on humor in social interaction. Psychology of Language and Communication, 22, 238–259. https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2018-001010.2478/plc-2018-0010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keevallik, L. (2018). Sequence initiation or self-talk? Commenting on the surroundings while mucking out a sheep stable. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.148523310.1080/08351813.2018.1485233
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001984210.1037/a0019842
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Komter, M.L. (2006). From talk to text: The interactional construction of a police record. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(3), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_210.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Komter, M. L. (2012). The career of a suspect’s statement: Talk, text, context. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 731–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144561245748610.1177/1461445612457486
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laurier, E. (2008). Drinking up endings: Conversational resources of the café. Language & Communication, 28(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2008.01.01110.1016/j.langcom.2008.01.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Licoppe, C. & Tuncer, S. (2014). Attending to a summons and putting other activities ‘on hold’. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 167–190). John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1423–1442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.142310.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mondada, L. (2009). The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations. Food Quality and Preference, 20(8), 558–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.03.00610.1016/j.foodqual.2009.03.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mondada, L. (2012). Talking and driving. Multiactivity in the car. Semiotica, 191(1/4), 223–256. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-006210.1515/sem-2012-0062
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mondada, L. (2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity: Operating and demonstrating in the surgical theatre. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 33–76). John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mondada, L. (2016). Going to write. Embodied trajectories of writing of collective proposals in grassroots democracy meetings. Language and Dialogue, 6(1), 140–178. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.05mon10.1075/ld.6.1.05mon
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mondada, L. (2017). Walking and talking together: Questions/answers and mobile participation in guided visits. Social Science Information, 56(2), 220–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901841769477710.1177/0539018417694777
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mondada, M., & Svinhufvud, K. (2016). Writing-in-interaction. Studying writing as a multimodal phenomenon in social interaction. Language and Dialogue, 6(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.01mon10.1075/ld.6.1.01mon
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monteiro, D. (2016). Street-level bureaucracy revisited. Formulating address in social work service encounters. Language and Dialogue, 6(1), 54–80. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.02mon10.1075/ld.6.1.02mon
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nishizaka, A., & Sunaga, M. (2015). Conversing while massaging: Multidimensional asymmetries of multiple activities in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 200–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.102550610.1080/08351813.2015.1025506
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ogden, R. (2001). Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 31,139–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002510030100111610.1017/S0025100301001116
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.35810.1037/0096-1523.10.3.358
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 308–329). Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, R. D. & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207– 231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.20710.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruusuvuori, J. (2001). Looking means listening: Coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction. Social Science and Medicine, 52(7), 1093–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00227-610.1016/S0277-9536(00)00227-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 969–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/41224310.2307/412243
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Wiley Blackwell10.21832/9781847692849-020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simmel, G. (1924). Sociology of the senses: Visual interaction. In R. E. Park, & E. W. Burges (Eds.), Introduction to the science of sociology (pp. 356–361). University of Chicago Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ’uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Georgetown University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–596.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63.10.1017/S0047404500001019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stivers, T. & Heritage, J. (2001). Breaking the sequential mold: Answering 'more than the question' during comprehensive history taking. Text & Talk, 21(1-2), 151–18510.1515/text.1.21.1-2.151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Streeck, J. (2014). Mutual gaze and recognition: Revisiting Kendon’s ’Gaze direction in two-person conversation’. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (Eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon (pp. 35–56). John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Streeck, J., & Kallmeyer, W. (2001). Interaction by inscription. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(4), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00126-510.1016/S0378-2166(99)00126-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Svinhufvud, K. (2016). Nodding and note-taking. Multimodal analysis of writing and nodding in student counseling interaction. Language and Dialogue, 6(1), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.03svi10.1075/ld.6.1.03svi
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Svinhufvud, K., & Vehviläinen, S. (2013). Papers, documents, and the opening of an academic supervision encounter. Text & Talk, 33(1), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-000710.1515/text-2013-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ticca, A. C. (2014). Managing multiactivity in a travel agency: Making phone calls while interacting with costumers. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 191–223). John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trasmundi, S. B. (2020). Errors and interaction: A cognitive ethnography of emergency medicine. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.30910.1075/pbns.309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trasmundi, S. B., & Steffensen, S. V. (2016). Meaning emergence in the ecology of dialogical systems. Psychology of Language and Communication, 20(2), 154-181. https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2016-000910.1515/plc-2016-0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wechsler, K., Drescher, U., Janouch, C., Haeger, M., Voelcker-Rehage, C. & Bock, O. (2018). Multitasking during simulated car driving: A comparison of young and older persons. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0091010.3389/fpsyg.2018.00910
]Search in Google Scholar