Accès libre

Are Neural Substrates of Language and Communication Distinct?

   | 28 août 2014
Psychology of Language and Communication's Cover Image
Psychology of Language and Communication
Children's Language and Communicative Knowledge, Part One. In Memory of Professor Grace Wales Shugar, Issue Editor: Barbara Bokus
À propos de cet article

Citez

van Ackeren, M. J., Casasanto, D., Bekkering, H., Hagoort, P., & Ruschemeyer, S.A. (2012). Pragmatics in action: Indirect and the cortical motor network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (11), 2237-2247.10.1162/jocn_a_00274Search in Google Scholar

Apperly, I.A., Samson, D., Carroll, N., Hussain, S., & Humphreys, G.W. (2006). Intact first and second-order false belief reasoning in a patient with severely impaired grammar. Social Neuroscience, 1 (3/4), 334-348.10.1080/17470910601038693Search in Google Scholar

Astington, J.W. & Baird, J.A. (2005). Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Austin, L.J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bašnáková, J., Weber, K., Petersson,K., van Berkum, J., & Hagoort, P. (2013). Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cerebral Cortex [epub ahead of print].Search in Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. (1995). Language and Human Behavior. London: UCL Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic Structures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218329Search in Google Scholar

Devlin, K. (1999). Żegnaj, Kartezjuszu. Rozstanie z logiką w poszukiwaniu nowej kosmologii umysłu [Goodbye, Descartes. The End of Logic and the Search for a New Cosmology of the Mind]. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.Search in Google Scholar

Dodell-Feder, D., Koster-Hale, J., Bedny, M., & Saxe, R. (2011). fMRI item analysis in a theory of mind task. NeuroImage, 55 (2), 705-712.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.040Search in Google Scholar

Egorova, N., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2014). Neural dynamics of speech act comprehension: An MEG study of naming and requesting. Brain Topography, 27 (3), 375-392.10.1007/s10548-013-0329-3Search in Google Scholar

Fedorenko, E., Behr, M.K., & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Functional specificity for highlevel linguistic processing in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 108 (39), 16428-16433.10.1073/pnas.1112937108Search in Google Scholar

Ferstl, E.C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2008). The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29 (5), 581-593.10.1002/hbm.20422Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, T., Hauser, M., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97 (2),179-210.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Pres.Search in Google Scholar

Hagoort, P. (2013). MUC (Memory, Unification, Control) and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-13.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00416Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, M.D., Chomsky. N., & Tecumseh Fitch, W. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.10.1126/science.298.5598.1569Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. & Pinker, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language. Cognition, 97 (2), 211-225.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006Search in Google Scholar

Kurcz, I. (1993). Psycholingwistyka [Psycholinguistics]. In I. Kurcz (Ed.), Psychologia a semiotyka. Pojęcia i zagadnienia [Psychology and Semiotics. Concepts and Issues] (pp. 25-46). Warszawa: Zakład Semiotyki Logicznej Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Kurcz, I. (2005). Psychologia języka i komunikacji [Psychology of Language and Communication]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.Search in Google Scholar

Mather, M., Cacioppo, J.T., & Kanwisher, N. (2013). How fMRI can inform cognitive theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8 (1),108-113.10.1177/1745691612469037Search in Google Scholar

Milligan, K., Astington, J.W., & Dack, L.A. (2007). Language and Theory of Mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78 (2), 622-646.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.xSearch in Google Scholar

Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive Meaning: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mahy, C., Moses, L., & Pfeifer, J. (2014). How and where: Theory-of-mind in the brain. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 68-81.10.1016/j.dcn.2014.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Mather, M., Cacioppo, J.T., & Kanwisher, N. (2013). Introduction to the special section: 20 years of fMRI - What has it done for understanding cognition? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8 (1), 41-43.10.1177/1745691612469036Search in Google Scholar

Meltzoff, A.N. (2007). “Like me”: A foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science, 10 (1), 126-134. Olineck, K.M. & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2007). Imitation of intentional actions and internal state language in infancy predict preschool theory of mind skills. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4 (1), 14-30. Search in Google Scholar

van Overwalle, F. & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 48 (3), 564-584.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95 (2), 201-236.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Varley, R., Siegal, M., & Want, S. (2001). Severe impairment in grammar does not preclude theory of mind. Neurocase, 7 (6), 489-493. de Villiers, J. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cognitive Development, 17 (1), 1037-1060. Search in Google Scholar

de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117 (11), 1858-1878. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8506
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
Volume Open
Sujets de la revue:
Social Sciences, Psychology, Applied Psychology