Dosimetric impact of rotational set-up errors in high-risk prostate cancer

1. Spiotto MT, Hancock SL, King CR. Radiotherapy after prostatectomy: improved biochemical relapse-free survival with whole pelvic compared with prostate bed only for high-risk patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.035 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.03517459606 Search in Google Scholar

2. Lin CC, Gray PJ, Jemal A, Efstathiou JA. Androgen deprivation with or without radiation therapy for clinically node-positive prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(7):729-737. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv119 10.1093/jnci/djv11925957435 Search in Google Scholar

3. Herrmann H, Seppenwoolde Y, Georg D, Widder J. Image guidance: past and future of radiotherapy. Der Radiologe. 2019;59(1):21-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-019-0573-y 10.1007/s00117-019-0573-y691471031346650 Search in Google Scholar

4. Keall PJ, Nguyen ST, O’Brien R, et al. Review of real-time 3-dimensional image guided radiation therapy on standard-equipped cancer radiation therapy systems: are we at the tipping point for the era of real-time radiation therapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102(4):922-931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.016 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.016680017429784460 Search in Google Scholar

5. Nabavizadeh N, Elliott DA, Chen Y, et al. Image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) practice patterns and IGRT’s impact on workflow and treatment planning: Results from a national survey of American Society for Radiation Oncology members. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94(4):850-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.035 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.03526972658 Search in Google Scholar

6. Ghadjar P, Fiorino C, et al. ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on the use of image guided radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2019;141:5-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.027 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.02731668515 Search in Google Scholar

7. Zhang X, Shan G, Liu J, Wang B. Margin evaluation of translational and rotational set-up errors in intensity modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Springer Plus. 2016;5(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1796-2 10.1186/s40064-016-1796-2476614327026850 Search in Google Scholar

8. Katayama H, Takahashi S, Kobata T, et al. Impact of rotational errors of whole pelvis on the dose of prostate-based image-guided radiotherapy to pelvic lymph nodes and small bowel in high-risk prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021;26(6):906-914, https://doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0107 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0107872645334992862 Search in Google Scholar

9. Lawton CAF, Michalski J, El-Naqa I, et al. RTOG GU Radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(2):383-387, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.002 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.002290515018947938 Search in Google Scholar

10. Gay H, Barthold HJ, O’Meara E, et al. Pelvic normal tissue contouring guidelines for radiation therapy: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus panel atlas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(3):353-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.023 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.023390436822483697 Search in Google Scholar

11. Webster A, Appelt AL, Eminowicz G. Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Pelvic Cancers: A Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Utilisation. Clinical Oncology. 2020;32:805-816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2020.09.010 10.1016/j.clon.2020.09.01033071029 Search in Google Scholar

12. Kershaw L, van Zadelhoff L, Heemsbergen W, et al. Image Guided Radiation Therapy Strategies for Pelvic Lymph Node Irradiation in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Motion and Margins. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;100(1):68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.08.044 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.08.04429051038 Search in Google Scholar

13. Laursen LV, Elstrøm UV, Vestergaard A, et al. Residual rotational set-up errors after daily cone-beam CT image guided radiotherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105(2):220-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.012 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.01223022176 Search in Google Scholar

14. Kaiser A, Schultheiss TE, Wong,JYC, et al. Pitch, roll, and yaw variations in patient positioning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(3):949-955, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.055 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.05516949765 Search in Google Scholar

15. Quint S, de Boer HCJ, van Sörnsen de Koste JR, et al. Set-up verification of cervix cancer patients treated with long treatment fields; implications of a non-rigid bony anatomy. Radiother Oncol. 2001;60(1):25-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00346-2 10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00346-2 Search in Google Scholar