[
1. Kalender WA. X-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:29-43. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R0310.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R0316790909
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Seeram, E. Computed tomography: Physical principles, clinical applications, and quality control. Elsevier. Fourth edition. 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Ebrahiminia A, Asadinezhad M, Mohammadi F, Khoshgard K. Eye lens dose optimization through gantry tilting in brain ct scan: the potential effect of the radiological technologists’ training. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020;189:527-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaa07310.1093/rpd/ncaa07332472135
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Haryanto F, et al. An evaluation of computed tomography dose index measurements using a pencil ionisation chamber and small detectors. J Radiol Prot. 2019;39:112-24. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aaf2b410.1088/1361-6498/aaf2b430524057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Toyoda T. et al. The impact of head miscentering on the eye lens dose in CT scanning: Phantoms study. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1204:012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1204/1/01202210.1088/1742-6596/1204/1/012022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP Annals of the ICRP Annals of the ICRP. ICRP Publication 92, annals of ICRP 28. 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Ishizaka H, Naka M, Nagase H, et al. A new brain CT reference line:the lower eyelid to the inner occipital base line closely parallels the Talairach–Tournoux line. Acta Radiologica Open. 2020;9:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/205846012090240610.1177/2058460120902406698597132047655
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Nishizawa K, Maruyama T, Takayama M, Okada M, Hachiya J, Furuya Y. Determinations of organ doses and effective dose equivalents from computed tomographic examination. Br J Radiol. 1991;64:20-8. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-64-757-2010.1259/0007-1285-64-757-201998834
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Maclennan AC. Radiation dose to the lens from CT brain scans in general radiology departments. Br J Radiol. 1995;68:219. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-68-806-21910.1259/0007-1285-68-806-2197735757
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Poon R, Badawy MK. Radiation dose and risk to the lens of the eye during CT examinations of the brain. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019;63:786-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.1295010.1111/1754-9485.1295031520467
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Nikupaavo U, Kaasalainen T, Reijonen V, Ahonen SM, Kortesniemi M. Lens dose in routine head CT: Comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:117-23. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.1276310.2214/AJR.14.1276325539246
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Fung KKL, Choi KHW, Hom H. Lens dose reduction in paediatric ct brain scan using the supra-orbitomeatal baseline technique. ECR 2005. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1594/ECR05/C-0994
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Parsi M, Sohrabi M, Mianji F, Paydar R. Gantry angulation effects on CT dose along the z-axis direction in head examinations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017;177:458-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx06410.1093/rpd/ncx06428499013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Ali STM, Hamad MM, Ayad CE, Abdalla EA, Ahmed AS. Evaluation of the technical specifications of computerized tomography scanners in Jazan. Sudan Med Monit. 2013;8:159-66. https://doi.org/10.4103/1858-5000.13261110.4103/1858-5000.132611
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15 Abou-Elenein HS. Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulator: In home Z-phantom for mechanical tests of the couch and the gantry. Chinese-German J Clin Oncol. 2013;12(5):237-242. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-012-1133-310.1007/s10330-012-1133-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging Committee. Specification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners. AAPM Report No. 39. New York: the American Institute of Physics, Inc. 1993.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Sharma DS, Sharma SD, Sanu KK, Saju S, Deshpande DD, Kannan S. Performance evaluation of a dedicated computed tomography scanner used for virtual simulation using in-house fabricated CT phantoms. J Med Phys. 2006;31:28-35. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.2566710.4103/0971-6203.25667300389121206637
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Specification and acceptance testing of computed tomography scanners. AAPM Report No. 39. 1993.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I. Automated Estimation of Patient’s Size from 3D Image of Patient for Size Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE). Adv Sci Eng Med. 2015;7:892-6. https://doi.org/10.1166/asem.2015.178010.1166/asem.2015.1780
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Anam C. Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I, Dougherty G. A fully automated calculation of size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in thoracic and head CT examinations. J Phys Conf Ser. 2016;694:012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/694/1/01203010.1088/1742-6596/694/1/012030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I, Dougherty G. Automated calculation of water-equivalent diameter (DW) based on AAPM task group 220. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17:32033. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.617110.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6171569005927455491
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Boulter DJ, Rumboldt Z, Bonaldi G, Muto M, Cianfoni A. Tilting the gantry for CT-guided spine procedures. Radiol Medica. 2014;119:750-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0344-110.1007/s11547-013-0344-124531889
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. IAEA. Quality assurance programme for computed tomography: Diagnostic and therapy applications. IAEA Huma. Health Series No. 19. 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
