[Aijmer, Karin. “Challenges in the contrastive study of discourse markers.” Eds. Oscar Loureda, Ines Recio Fernandez, Laura Nadal, Adriana Cruz. Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse (2019): 17–42. Print.10.1075/pbns.305.01aij]Search in Google Scholar
[Aijmer, Karin. English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus (Vol. 10). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 2002. Print.10.1075/scl.10]Search in Google Scholar
[Aijmer, Karin. “I think as a marker of discourse style in argumentative student writing.” Gothenburg Studies in English 81 (2001): 247–257. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ament, Jennifer, Julia Baron Pares, and Carmen Perez-Vidal. “A study on the functional uses of textual pragmatic markers by native speakers and English-medium instruction learners.” Journal of Pragmatics 156 (2020): 41–53. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Appel, Randy, and Andrzej Szeib. “Linking adverbials in L2 English academic writing: L1-related differences.” System 78 (2018): 115–129. Print.10.1016/j.system.2018.08.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Aull, Laura. “Linguistic markers of stance and genre in upper-level student writing.” Written Communication 36.2 (2019): 267–295. Print.10.1177/0741088318819472]Search in Google Scholar
[Aull, Laura L., and Zak Lancaster. “Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison.” Written Communication 31.2 (2014): 151–183. Print.10.1177/0741088314527055]Search in Google Scholar
[Bax, Stephen. Discourse and genre: Analysing language in context. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 2011. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bax, Stephen, Fumiyo Nakatsuhara, and Daniel Waller. “Researching L2 writers’ use of metadiscourse markers at intermediate and advanced levels.” System 83 (2019): 79–95. Print.10.1016/j.system.2019.02.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Bell, David M. “Cancellative discourse markers: a core/periphery approach.” Pragmatics 8.4 (1998): 515–541. Print.10.1075/prag.8.4.03bel]Search in Google Scholar
[Bell, David M. “Nevertheless, still and yet: Concessive cancellative discourse markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 42.7 (2010): 1912–1927. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruce, Ion. “A role for genre-based pedagogy in academic writing instruction: An EAP perspective.” TEXT Journal 21 (2013): 1–15. Print.10.52086/001c.28377]Search in Google Scholar
[Carter, Susan, Cally Guerin, and Claire Aitchison. “Crafting Writing: Clarity, Style and Voice.” Doctoral Writing. Singapore: Springer, 2020. 93–125. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cuenca, Maria-Josep, and Maria-Josep Marin. “Co-occurrence of discourse markers in Catalan and Spanish oral narrative.” Journal of Pragmatics 41.5 (2009): 899–914. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Das, Debopam, and Maite Taboada “Signalling of Coherence Relations in Discourse, Beyond Discourse Markers.” Discourse Processes 55.8 (2018), 743–770. Print.10.1080/0163853X.2017.1379327]Search in Google Scholar
[Fraser, Bruce. “An approach to discourse markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 14.3 (1990): 383–398. Print.10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-V]Search in Google Scholar
[Fraser, Bruce. “The combining of Discourse Markers – A beginning.” Journal of Pragmatics 86 (2015): 48–53. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Fraser, Bruce. “What are discourse markers?” Journal of Pragmatics 31.7 (1999): 931–952. Print.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Furko, Peter B. “The Use of Discourse Markers in Business English Textbooks: Issues in L2 Communicative Competence and Learners’ Input.” Discourse Markers and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. 119–140. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ha, Myung-Jeong. “Linking adverbials in first-year Korean university EFL learners’ writing: A corpus-informed analysis.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 29.6 (2016): 1090–1101. Print.10.1080/09588221.2015.1068814]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken. “Academic Discourse.” Eds. Ken Hyland and Brian Paltridge (2011). Bloomsbury Companion to Discourse Analysis. London: A&C Black. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken. “Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 13.2 (2004): 133–151. Print.10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken. “Genre and academic writing in the disciplines.” Language Teaching 41.4 (2008): 543–562. Print.10.1017/S0261444808005235]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken. “Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction.” Journal of Second Language Writing 16.3 (2007): 148–164. Print.10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Johns, Ann M. “Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest.” Language Teaching 41.2 (2008): 237–252. Print.10.1017/S0261444807004892]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, Karen E., and Paula R. Golombek. “Informing and transforming language teacher education pedagogy.” Language Teaching Research 24.1 (2020): 116–127. Print.10.1177/1362168818777539]Search in Google Scholar
[Kapranov, Oleksandr. “Discourse Markers in Argumentative Essays in EFL by Norwegian Pre-Service Primary School Teachers.” English Language Teaching through the Lens of Experience. Ed. Christoph Haase. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing (2019): 83–100. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krulatz, Anna, and Jonas Iversen. “Building inclusive language classroom spaces through multilingual writing practices for newly-arrived students in Norway.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 64.3 (2020): 372–388. Print.10.1080/00313831.2018.1557741]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuiken, Folkert, and Ineke Vedder. “The interplay between academic writing abilities of Dutch undergraduate students, a remedial writing programme, and academic achievement.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (2020): 1–12. Print.10.1080/13670050.2020.1726280]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuteeva, Maria, and Negretti, Raffaella. Graduate students’ genre knowledge and perceived disciplinary practices: Creating a research space across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 41 (2016): 36–49. Print.10.1016/j.esp.2015.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Mack, Lindsay. “Reflective journals in EFL tutoring.” Journal of Asia TEFL 9.4 (2012). Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Negretti, Raffaella, and Špela Mežek. “Participatory appropriation as a pathway to self-regulation in academic writing: The case of three BA essay writers in literature.” The Journal of Writing Research 11.1 (2019): 1–40. Print.10.17239/jowr-2019.11.01.01]Search in Google Scholar
[Polat, Brittany. “Investigating acquisition of discourse markers through a developmental learner corpus.” Journal of Pragmatics 43.15 (2011): 3745– 3756. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.09.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Povolna, Renata. “Causal and Contrastive Discourse Markers in Novice Academic Writing.” Brno Studies in English 38.2 (2012). Print.10.5817/BSE2012-2-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Povolna, Renata. “A cross-cultural analysis of conjuncts as indicators of the interaction and negotiation of meaning in research articles.” Topics in Linguistics 17.1 (2016): 45–63. Print.10.1515/topling-2016-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Rhee, Seongha. “‘I know you are not, but if you were asking me’: On emergence of discourse markers of topic presentation from hypothetical questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 60 (2014): 1–16. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Rugen, Brian. “Strengthening Project-Based Learning with Genre Checkpoints.” The English Teacher 48.3 (2020): 115–127. Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, Mike. Wordsmith Tools: version 4.0: single-user licence. 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[SPSS IBM (2009). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 20.0. New York: IBM Corp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Starks, Donna, Howard Nicholas, and Shem Macdonald. “Structured reflective communication as a meta-genre in teacher education: Creative uses of critique in a teacher education program.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online) 37.3 (2012): 90. Print.10.14221/ajte.2012v37n3.8]Search in Google Scholar
[Tapper, Marie. “Connectives in advanced Swedish EFL learners’ written English – preliminary results.” The Department of English: Working Papers in English Linguistics 5 (2005): 116–144.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tardy, Christine M. Building Genre Knowledge. West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tardy, Christine M. “Researching first and second language genre learning: A comparative review and a look ahead.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15.2 (2006): 79–101. Print.10.1016/j.jslw.2006.04.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Triki, Nasrine. “Revisiting the metadiscursive aspect of definitions in academic writing.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 37 (2019): 104–116. Print.10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Uccelli, Paola, Christina L. Dobbs, and Jessica Scott. “Mastering academic language: Organization and stance in the persuasive writing of high school students.” Written Communication 30.1 (2013): 36–62. Print.10.1177/0741088312469013]Search in Google Scholar
[Waring, Hansun Zhang. “Also as a discourse marker: its use in disjunctive and disaffiliative environments.” Discourse Studies 5.3 (2003): 415–436. Print.10.1177/14614456030053006]Search in Google Scholar
[Wei, Xing. “Assessing the metacognitive awareness relevant to L1-to-L2 rhetorical transfer in L2 writing: The cases of Chinese EFL writers across proficiency levels.” Assessing Writing (2020): 1–12. Print.10.1016/j.asw.2020.100452]Search in Google Scholar
[Werner, Valentin. “Adversative pragmatic markers in learner language: A crosssectional perspective.” Corpus Pragmatics 1.2 (2017): 135–158. Print.10.1007/s41701-017-0008-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolk, Christoph, Sandra Gotz, and Katja Jaschke. “Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables.” Corpus Pragmatics (2020): 1–30. Print.10.1007/s41701-019-00072-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhou, Jiming, Ke Zhao, and Phillip Dawson. “How first-year students perceive and experience assessment of academic literacies.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45.2 (2020): 266–278. Print.10.1080/02602938.2019.1637513]Search in Google Scholar