[Askehave, Inger and John Malcolm Swales. “Genre Identification and Communicative Purpose: A Problem and a Possible Solution.” Applied Linguistics 23.2 (2011): 195-212.10.1093/applin/22.2.195]Search in Google Scholar
[Bhatia, Vijak. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chardonnens, László Sándor and Rosanne Hebing. “A Descriptive Analysis of Nijmegen, Universiteitsbibliotheek, HS 194, a Late Medieval English Manuscript at Nijmegen University Library.” English Studies 92.1 (2011): 20-38.10.1080/0013838X.2010.536693]Search in Google Scholar
[Doró, Katalin. “Selling their Research: _e Linguistic Realization of Rhetoric Moves in English _esis Abstracts Written by Hungarian Undergraduates.” Romanian Journal of English Studies 10.1 (2013): 181-91.10.2478/rjes-2013-0016]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartley, James. “Improving the Clarity of Journal Abstracts in Psychology: _e Case for Structure.” Science Communication 24.3 (2003): 366-79. ---. “Current Findings from Research on Structured Abstracts.” Journal of Medical Library Association 92.3 (2004): 368-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirano, Eliana. “Research Article Introduction in English for Specific Purposes: A Comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English.” English for Specific Purposes 28 (2009): 240-50.10.1016/j.esp.2009.02.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing.]Search in Google Scholar
[London: Longman, 2000. ---. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. New York: Continuum, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.]Search in Google Scholar
[Löfrgen, Hans. “Cooper’s Pioneer: Breaking the Chain of Representation.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 8.3 (2009): 1-19.10.35360/njes.195]Search in Google Scholar
[Lon, Chuah Ek et al. “Conveying Communicative Intent: Moves and Metadiscourse in Abstract Writing.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 1.7 (2012): 56-65.10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.56]Search in Google Scholar
[Lorés, Rosa. “On RA Abstracts: From Rhetorical Structure to _ematic Organization.” English for Specific Purposes 23 (2004): 280-302.10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Martín-Martín, Pedro. _e Rhetoric of Abstracts in English and Spanish Scientific Discourse: A Cross-Cultural Genre-Analytic Approach. Bern: Peter Lang, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ozturk, Ismet. “_e Textual Organization of Research Article Introduction in Applied Linguistics: Variability within a Single Discipline.” English for Specific Purposes 26 (2007): 25-38.10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Pho, Phuong Dzung. “Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics and Education Technology: A Study of Linguistic Realizations of Rhetoric Structure and Authorial Stance.” Discourse Studies 10.2 (2008): 231-50.10.1177/1461445607087010]Search in Google Scholar
[Samraj, Betty. “An Exploration of a Genre Set: Research Article Abstracts and Introduction in Two Disciplines.” English for Specific Purposes 24 (2005): 141-56.10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[San, Lam Yik and Helen Tan. “A Comparative Study of the Rhetorical Moves in Abstracts of Published Research Articles and Students’ Term Papers in the Field of Computer and Communication Systems Engineering.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 1.7 (2012): 40-50.10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.40]Search in Google Scholar
[Santos, Mauro Bittercourt Dos. “_e Textual Organization of Research Paper Abstracts in Applied Linguistics.” Text 16. 4 (1996): 481-99.10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481]Search in Google Scholar
[Sheldon, Elena. “Rhetorical Differences in RA Introductions Written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 Writers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10 (2011): 238-51. Simon, Ellen and Miriam Taverniers. ---. “Advanced EFL Learners’ Beliefs about Language Learning and Teaching: a Comparison between Grammar, Pronunciation, and Vocabulary.” English Studies 92.8 (2011): 896-922.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stotesbury, Hilkka. “Evaluation in Research Article Abstracts in the Narrative and Hard Sciences.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2 (2003): 327-41.10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Suntara, Watinee and Siriluck Usaha. “Research Article Abstracts in Two Related Disciplines: Rhetorical Variation between Linguistics and Applied Linguistics.” English Language Teaching 6.2 (2013): 84-99.10.5539/elt.v6n2p84]Search in Google Scholar
[Swales, John Malcolm. Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. ---. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tseng, Fan-ping. “Analysis of Move Structure and Verb Tense of Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics Journals.” International Journal of English Linguistics 1.2 (2011): 27-39.10.5539/ijel.v1n2p27]Search in Google Scholar
[KATALIN DORÓ 138]Search in Google Scholar
[Youdeowei, Anthony et al., eds. Scientific Writing for Agricultural Research Scientists: A Training Resource Manual. Wageningen: CTA, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wenger, Etienne. Communities of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.10.1017/CBO9780511803932]Search in Google Scholar
[Zand-Vakili, Elham and Alireza Fard Kashani. “_e Contrastive Move Analysis: An Investigation of Persian and English Research Articles’ Abstract and Introduction Parts.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 3.2 (2012): 129-32. ]Search in Google Scholar