<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><bold>Introduction.</bold> The most important application of information technology in nursing is generating and maintaining patient’s electronic records. Implementing ICNP® to this can guarantee the continuity and high quality of evidence-based care.<bold>Aim.</bold> Obtaining information on nurses’ opinions on the implementation of ICNP® in clinical practice.<bold>Material and methods.</bold> The study was conducted in late 2018 and early 2019 in a group of 104 nurses of the University Clinical Centre in Gdańsk. It involved conducting a diagnostic survey.<bold>Results.</bold> Prior to the survey, 77.9% of the respondents were aware of ICNP®. The respondents who did not provide the correct answer to question about the essence of the ICNP® were mostly over 45 years of age. When it comes to 25% of subjects, they declared they were willing to use ICNP®. The vast majority considered it more convenient to maintain care records in the traditional way than with the use of ICNP®. The respondents with a master’s degree showed a higher level of acceptance for the implementation of the ICNP® to clinical practice than respondents with secondary and tertiary education.<bold>Conclusions.</bold> The nursing staff over 45 years old presented a lower level of knowledge related to the ICNP® as compared to other respondents. The reasons behind the conviction that applying ICNP® would be difficult included understaffing and lack of mobile devices such as tablets or laptops in hospital wards. It is, therefore, necessary to launch a nursing terminology training programme, equip branches with the necessary devices and comply with minimum employment standards.</abstract>

Introduction. The most important application of information technology in nursing is generating and maintaining patient’s electronic records. Implementing ICNP® to this can guarantee the continuity and high quality of evidence-based care.Aim. Obtaining information on nurses’ opinions on the implementation of ICNP® in clinical practice.Material and methods. The study was conducted in late 2018 and early 2019 in a group of 104 nurses of the University Clinical Centre in Gdańsk. It involved conducting a diagnostic survey.Results. Prior to the survey, 77.9% of the respondents were aware of ICNP®. The respondents who did not provide the correct answer to question about the essence of the ICNP® were mostly over 45 years of age. When it comes to 25% of subjects, they declared they were willing to use ICNP®. The vast majority considered it more convenient to maintain care records in the traditional way than with the use of ICNP®. The respondents with a master’s degree showed a higher level of acceptance for the implementation of the ICNP® to clinical practice than respondents with secondary and tertiary education.Conclusions. The nursing staff over 45 years old presented a lower level of knowledge related to the ICNP® as compared to other respondents. The reasons behind the conviction that applying ICNP® would be difficult included understaffing and lack of mobile devices such as tablets or laptops in hospital wards. It is, therefore, necessary to launch a nursing terminology training programme, equip branches with the necessary devices and comply with minimum employment standards.

ICNP® – why not? Nurses’ opinions on the implementation of ICNP® vocabulary for clinical practice

Pielegniarstwo  XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

ICNP – why not? Nurses’ opinions on the implementation of ICNP vocabulary for clinical practice

Introduction. The most important application of information technology in nursing is generating and maintaining patient’s electronic records. Implementing...

ICNP^® – why not? Nurses’ opinions on the implementation of ICNP^® vocabulary for clinical practice

Publié en ligne: 08 déc. 2020

Pages: 236 - 243

Reçu: 01 mai 2020

Accepté: 12 juin 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pielxxiw-2020-0034

Mots clés
classification, ICNP, nursing electronic records

© 2020 Katarzyna Pietrzak et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

ICNP® – why not? Nurses’ opinions on the implementation of ICNP® vocabulary for clinical practice

Publié en ligne: 08 déc. 2020

Pages: 236 - 243

Reçu: 01 mai 2020

Accepté: 12 juin 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pielxxiw-2020-0034

Mots clésclassification, ICNP, nursing electronic records

© 2020 Katarzyna Pietrzak et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

ICNP^® – why not? Nurses’ opinions on the implementation of ICNP^® vocabulary for clinical practice

Mots clés
classification, ICNP, nursing electronic records