Accès libre

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Concept of Professional Judgment in Accounting and Financial Auditing Versus Jurisprudence

 et   
24 juil. 2025
À propos de cet article

Citez
Télécharger la couverture

Alvin A. Arens, Loebbecke, James K., Audit: an integrated approach, Ed. a 8-a, Publisher: Chișinău : Arc, 2003;Search in Google Scholar

Bercheci, M. (2010). Capitalizing on Financial Reporting. Bucharest: CECCAR Publishing HouseSearch in Google Scholar

Burlaud, A. and Niculescu, M. (2016), Accounting standards that appeal to the professional judgment: a threat or an opportunity for the accounting profession?, Audit Financiar, vol. XIV, nr. 12(144)/2016, pp. 1325-1334, DOI: 10.20869/AUDITF/2016/144/1325, Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.20869/AUDITF/2016/144/1325Search in Google Scholar

Fearnley, S. and Beattie, V. and Brandt, R. (2005) Auditor independence and audit risk: a reconceptualisation. Journal of International Accounting Research 4(1):pp. 39-71Search in Google Scholar

L. Feleagă, N. Feleagă (2007), Financial Accounting: A European and International Approach, Economic Publishing HouseSearch in Google Scholar

Garcia-Blandon, Josep, Josep Maria Argiles-Bosch, and Diego Ravenda. 2020. Audit firm tenure and audit quality: A cross-European study. Journal of international financial management & accounting 31: 35-64Search in Google Scholar

Gîrbină, M. M., & Bunea, Ş. (2008). Syntheses, case studies, and multiple-choice tests on the application of IAS (revised) - IFRS. CECCAR - The Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania.Search in Google Scholar

Grosu, M., Istrate, C., & Robu, I. B. (2023). Empirical Study on the Analysis of the Financial Auditor’s Concern in Ensuring the Transparency and Sustainable Performance of BSE Listed Companies. Audit Financiar, 21(172)Search in Google Scholar

Glover S. M, Taylor M. H. and Yi-Jing Wu, (2017), Current Practices and Challenges in Auditing Fair Value Measurements and Complex Estimates: Implications for Auditing Standards and the Academy AUDITING, Journal of Practice & Theory Feb 2017, Vol. 36, No. 1 (February 2017) pp. 63-84Search in Google Scholar

Horton, Joanne, Maria Tsipouridou, and Anthony Wood. 2018. European Market Reaction to Audit Reforms, European Accounting Review 991-1023Search in Google Scholar

Ivan, I. (2016), The importance of professional judgement applied in the context of the International Financial Reporting Standards, Audit Financiar, vol. XIV, no. 10(142)/2016, pp. 1127-1135, DOI: 10.20869/AUDITF/2016/142/1127 Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.20869/AUDITF/2016/142/1127Search in Google Scholar

Khan Mohammadi, M., Faghani Makrani, K., Gorganli Doji, J. (2021). Modeling the professional judgment of the auditor’, International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 12 (Special Issue), pp. 2367-2384. doi: 10.22075/ijnaa.2021.6272Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lam, K., Mensah, C., K., Yaw, M., ( 2006), A reply to Randall E. LaSalle. The civil justice system and going-concern audit reports: Comments on ‘Auditors’ decision-making under going-concern uncertainties in low litigation-risk environments: Evidence from Hong Kong, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25: 746–754.Search in Google Scholar

Lee Teck-Heang1, Azham M. A., (2008), The evolution of auditing: An analysis of the historical development, Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, nr.12/decembrie 2008, USA, pg.3/8Search in Google Scholar

Laudato, M., (2016), Performing effective (and effcient) audits – the importance of planning and materiality,https://www.accaglobal.com/us/en/member/discover/cpd-articles/audit-assurance/effective-audits.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Miller, M., C., (1999), Auditor Liability and the Development of a Strategic Evaluation of Going Concern, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10: 355-375, http://www.idealibrary.comSearch in Google Scholar

Moore Guy, (2009), Using professional judgment, The Auditor’s Report, American Accounting Association, Accounting and Business Education Research and Practice Worldwide, 33(1)Search in Google Scholar

Montenegro, Tania Menezes, Pedro Meira, and Sonia Silva. 2023. The investors’ prospects on mandatory auditor rotation: evidence from Euronext Lisbon., QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS 7: 440-462.Search in Google Scholar

Morariu A, Mihaela DĂUCEANU (AVRAM), Daniela Nicoleta MEDINȚU, The Financial Information Through IFRS and National Rules - Challenges, Valences and Limits, WBI Conference Proceedings of Economics, Finance and Business, 13 - 15 April 2015, Paris, France, IBSN: 978-1-922069-73-3, is indexed in: Cabell’s Directory, EBSCO, Ulrich of USA and ERA, ABDC of Australia, www.wbiworldconpro.com, www.parisconfo.com.Search in Google Scholar

Morariu, A., Stoian, F., Cercel, T., (2007), Valenţele şi limitele eşantionării în auditul financiar, Analele Universităţii din Craiova nr.35/2007, Volumul 1, pp.33-54Search in Google Scholar

Pătărlăgeanu, S.R., Dinu, M. and Constantin, M., 2020. Bibliometric Analysis of the Field of Green Public Procuremen. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(53), pp. 71-81. DOI 10.24818/EA/2019/53/71.Search in Google Scholar

Paunescu, Mirela. 2015. The Romanian audit market structure in case of listed companies and the impact of adopting IFRS. International Conference on Emerging Markets Queries in Finance and Business (EMQFB). Bucharest: Procedia Economics and Finance. 686-693.Search in Google Scholar

Randall E., LaSalle, (2006), The civil justice system and going concern audit reports: Comments on ‘‘Auditors’ decision-making under going concern uncertainties in low litigation risk environments: Evidence from Hong Kong, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25: 740–745.Search in Google Scholar

Sandu (Ursachi), A., (2016), The implications of the adoption and implementation of IFRS on the transparency of information presented in the reports of listed entities, Univ. Ștefan cel Mare, Suceava.Search in Google Scholar

Sujana, Edy and Dharmawan, Nyoman Ari Surya, Audit Quality Improvement and the Role of Risk: Audit as a Moderator, Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 17(4), 2023, 223-238. doi:10.14453/aabfj.v17i4.14.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Trotman, K.T., Tan, H.C., Ang, N., (2011), Fifty-year overview of judgment and decision-making research in accounting, Accounting and Finance, vol.51, pp.278–360.Search in Google Scholar

Trotman, Ken T. (2005), Discussion of Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective, Auditing, Journal of Practice &Theory, 73–87.Search in Google Scholar

Trotman, Ken, (2006), Professional judgment: are auditors being held to a higher standard than other professionals?, Center for Accounting and Assurance Services Research, University of New South Wales.Search in Google Scholar

Tsui, J., Windsor, C., (2001), Some cross-cultural evidence on ethical reasoning, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 143-150.Search in Google Scholar

The Handbook on the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants including the International Standards on Independent, 2021, Republished by CECCAR 2023.Search in Google Scholar

REGULATION (EU) NO. 537/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 regarding specific requirements relating to the statutory audit of public interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC.Search in Google Scholar