<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The “flusserian” phenomenology regards itself as a process, a strategy and, sirnultaneously as a criticism: it would be named an “interrogative phenomenology” or <italic>paraphenomenology</italic> whose researches are authentic points of “repere”, features that distinguish boundaries and establish paths, connecting them in referential webs that creatively construct a describing and interpretative map of our experience such as it really is. Thus, it is a phenomenology supported by hermeneutics, being its purpose onto-existential. The proposed analysis, from the problematic core of the phenomenological questioning, is that of grabbing the attention to something always expressed and, quite often, ignored or indifferent: a reftection on the gesture. This possible philosophy of the gesture enables the understanding of the relationship of a society/civilization in which the abyss between real and virtual was nullified, where it is possible to think things <italic>(Dinge)</italic> and the non-things/non-objects <italic>(Undinge),</italic> as much absurd as this last expression may seem. More important, though, is the openness to the understanding of a new emerging human condition and the strangeness of a society ruled by non-historical criteria: the entrance to the so called post-history.</p></abstract>

The “flusserian” phenomenology regards itself as a process, a strategy and, sirnultaneously as a criticism: it would be named an “interrogative phenomenology” or paraphenomenology whose researches are authentic points of “repere”, features that distinguish boundaries and establish paths, connecting them in referential webs that creatively construct a describing and interpretative map of our experience such as it really is. Thus, it is a phenomenology supported by hermeneutics, being its purpose onto-existential. The proposed analysis, from the problematic core of the phenomenological questioning, is that of grabbing the attention to something always expressed and, quite often, ignored or indifferent: a reftection on the gesture. This possible philosophy of the gesture enables the understanding of the relationship of a society/civilization in which the abyss between real and virtual was nullified, where it is possible to think things (Dinge) and the non-things/non-objects (Undinge), as much absurd as this last expression may seem. More important, though, is the openness to the understanding of a new emerging human condition and the strangeness of a society ruled by non-historical criteria: the entrance to the so called post-history.

Gesto, Coisa E Não-Coisa Na Fenomenologia Hermenêutica De V. Flusser

Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa

Phainomenon

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Gesto, Coisa E Não-Coisa Na Fenomenologia Hermenêutica De V. Flusser"}

The “flusserian” phenomenology regards itself as a process, a strategy and, sirnultaneously as a criticism: it would be named an “interrogative phenomenology”...

Gesto, Coisa E Não-Coisa Na Fenomenologia Hermenêutica De V. Flusser

Publié en ligne: 14 oct. 2021

Pages: 69 - 79

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/phainomenon-2012-0016

Mots clés
phenomenology, gesture, thing, non-thing

© 2012 Helena Lebre, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Gesto, Coisa E Não-Coisa Na Fenomenologia Hermenêutica De V. Flusser

Publié en ligne: 14 oct. 2021

Pages: 69 - 79

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/phainomenon-2012-0016

Mots clésphenomenology, gesture, thing, non-thing

© 2012 Helena Lebre, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
phenomenology, gesture, thing, non-thing