[
Ablonczy, B. (2022): Go East! A History of Hungarian Turanism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baghirov, O. (2022): Organization of Turkic States’ Economic Potential and Cooperation Prospects among its Members. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 27(1), 53–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baranyi, T. B. (2022): Hungary’s Role in the Organization of Turkic States as an Observer State: Limitations and Opportunities. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 27(1), 121–136.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernek, Á. (2018): Hazánk keleti nyitás politikája és a 21. századi geopolitikai stratégiák összefüggései [The relations between our country’s eastern opening policy and 21st century geopolitical strategies]. Külügyi Szemle [Foreign Affairs Review], (2), 122–144.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bíró -Nagy, A. & Juhász, V. & Szászi, Á. & Varga, A. (2023): What kind of EU do Hungarians want? Hungarian Society and the European Union in 2023. Policy Solutions, <accessed online: https://www.policysolutions.hu/en/news/615/what_kind_of_EU_do_Hungarians_want_publication>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cochran, M. (2012): Pragmatism and International Relations: A Story of Closure and Opening. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 2(IV–1), 1–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csiki, T. & Gazdag, F. & Hettyey, A. & Marsai, V. & Tongori, Z. (2014): A magyar külpolitika, 1989–2014 [Hungarian foreign policy, 1989–2014]. Budapest: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem Nemzetközi Intézet.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Egeresi, Z. (2020): Hungary’s Opening Towards the Turkic World. Avrasya Dünyası/Eurasian World, 4(6), 48–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Egeresi, Z. (2023): Hungary’s Return to the Turkic World. In: Uzun, Yılmaz Ulvi & Kaya, Hakan (eds.): Organization of Turkic States: Politics, Economics, Cultural Collaborations and 2040 Vision. Ankara: Nobel Bilimsel, 191–208.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eldem, T. (2022): Russia’s War on Ukraine and the Rise of the Middle Corridor as a Third Vector of Eurasian Connectivity: Connecting Europe and Asia via Central Asia, the Caucasus, and Turkey. SWP Comment, (64), 1–7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Éltető, A. & Völgyi, K. (2013): „Keleti nyitás” a számok tükrében – külkereskedelem Ázsiával [“Eastern opening” in the light of numbers – foreign trade with Asia]. Külgazdaság [Foreign Trade], (LVII), 67–104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ercan, O. (2023): The Turkic World and the Revival Aspirations of the Historic Silk Road. In: Uzun, Yılmaz Ulvi & Kaya, Hakan (eds.): Organization of Turkic States: Politics, Economics, Cultural Collaborations and 2040 Vision. Ankara: Nobel Bilimsel, 63–86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Franke, U. & Hellmann, G. (2018): American Pragmatism in Foreign Policy Analysis. In: Theis, Cameron G. (ed.): The Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol.1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 14–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gasimli, V. (2023): Introduction. In: Gasimli, Vusal (ed.): Turkic States Economy. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 1–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greilinger, G. (2023): Hungary’s Eastern Opening Policy as a Long -Term Political -Economic Strategy. Fokus, (4), 1–5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gusseinov, E. (2023): Magyarország és a Türk államok közötti együttműködés politikai és gazdasági lehetőségei: a jelenlegi tendenciák vizsgálata [Political and economic opportunities for cooperation between Hungary and Turkic states: an analysis of current trends]. Külügyi Műhely [Foreign Affairs Workshop], (1–2), 467–496.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Güngör, G. (2022): The Samarkand Summit of the Organization of Turkic States. Center for Eurasian Studies AVİM Commentary, 2022(41), 1–3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gyene, P. (2023): Magyarország partnerállamai a Türk Államok Szervezetében – (geo)politikai körkép [Hungary’s partner states in the Organization of Turkic States – (geo)political overview]. Business & Diplomacy Review, 1(1), 25–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haas, D. (2023): Explainer: What is Hungary doing in the Organisation of Turkic States?. Emerging Europe, <accessedonline:https://emerging-europe.com/explainer/explainer-what-is-hungary--doing-in-the-organisation-of-turkic-states/>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hellmann, G. & Rytövuori -Apunen, H. & Friedrichs, H. J. & Sil, R. & Kornprobst, M. & Jackson, P. T. (2009): Pragmatism and International Relations. International Studies Review, 11(3), 638–662.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herczeg, A. (2013): Azerbajdzsán gazdasági fejlődése és a Magyar -Azeri kulturális és diplomáciai kapcsolatok alakulása [The economic development of Azerbaijan and the development of Hungarian -Azerbaijani cultural and diplomatic relations]. Budapest: Europa Varietas Intézet.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hettyey, A. (2021): The illusion of autonomy and new others: role conflict and Hungarian foreign policy after 2010. Journal of International Relations and Development, 25(3), 260–294.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hóvári, J. (2022): Hungary and the Turkic World: A Twenty -first Century Challenge. Hungarian Conservative, <accessed online: https://www.hungarianconservative.com/articles/current/hungary-and-the-turkic-world-a-twenty-first-century-challenge/>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaeger, E. (2019): Shift to the East? Hungary’s Foreign Policy in Central Asia under Viktor Orbán. In: Šimurina, Jurica & Načinović Braje, Ivana & Pavić, Ivana (eds.): Proceedings of FEB Zagreb 10th International Odyssey Conference on Economics and Business, 12–15 June 2019, Opatija, Croatia. Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business, 174–185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kacziba, P. & Hasan, B. (2022): Hybrid foreign policies in the EU’s Eastern flank: adaptive diplomacy. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 13(Special Issue), 207–235.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kránitz, P. P. (2024): MKI Report: The Karabakh Peace Process and the Hungarian Strategy of Connectivity. Budapest: Hungarian Institute of International Affairs.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molnár, M. (2001): A Concise History of Hungary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, P. & Gazsi, D. (2023): Populist Capture of Foreign Policy Institutions: The Orbán Government and the De -Europeanization of Hungarian Foreign Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(2), 397–415.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, P. & Slominski, P. (2024): Hungary, the EU and Russia’s War Against Ukraine: The Changing Dynamics of EU Foreign Policymaking. In: Wiesner, Claudia & Knodt, Michèle (eds.): The War Against Ukraine and the EU: Facing New Realities. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 111–131.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagy, S. G. (2019): The Hungarian rediscovery of Latin America and the Caribbean. Hamburg: EU-LACFoundation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Organization of Turkic States (2021a): Business Forum in Budapest, Organization of Turkic States, <accessed online: http://www.turkkon.hu/EN/2021/09/27/business-forum-in-budapest/>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Organization of Turkic States (2021b): Meeting of the Ministers of the Turkic Council in charge of Transport Held in Budapest, Hungary, Organization of Turkic States, <accessed online: http://www.turkkon.hu/EN/2021/10/18/meeting-of-the-ministers-of-the-turkic-council-in--charge-of-transport-held-in-budapest-hungary/>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Organization of Turkic States (2022): Baghdad Amreyev is appointed as the President of the Turkic Investment Fund by the Leaders of OTS, Organization of Turkic States, <accessed online: https://www.turkicstates.org/en/haberler/baghdad-amreyev-is-appointed-as-the-president--of-the-turkic-investment-fund-by-the-leaders-of-ots_2682.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phua, C. C. R. (2022): Towards Strategic Pragmatism in Foreign Policy: Cases of United States of America, China and Singapore. London and New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pratt, S. F. (2016): Pragmatism as Ontology, Not (Just) Epistemology: Exploring the Full Horizon of Pragmatism as an Approach to IR Theory. International Studies Review, 18(3), 508–527.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puzyniak, A. (2018): Hungarian foreign policy after 2010 – selected problems. Facta Simonidis, 11(1), 231–242.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Racz, A. (2012): ‘The Shadow of an Axe’: Exploring the Hungary -Azerbaijan -Armenia Diplomatic Tensions. E -InternationalRelations, <accessed online: https://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/30/the--shadow-of-an-axe-the-background-of-the-hungary-azerbaijan-armenia-diplomatic-tensions/>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salamin, G. & Megyesi, Z. & Klemensits, P. (2021): Az Eurázsia narratíva kibontakozásának vizsgálata a magyar kormányzati nyilatkozatok és fejlesztéspolitikai dokumentimok tükrében [Examining the unfolding of the Eurasian narrative in the light of Hungarian government statements and planning policy documents]. Külügyi Szemle [Foreign Affairs Review], (3), 171–198.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tarrósy, I. & Vörös, Z. (2014): Hungary’s Global Opening to an Interpolar World. Politeja, 11 2(28), 139–162.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tarrósy, I. & Vörös, Z. (2020): Hungary’s Pragmatic Foreign Policy in a Post -American World. Politics in Central Europe, 16(1S), 113–134.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tarrósy, I. & Morenth, P. (2013): Global Opening for Hungary: A New Beginning for Hungarian Africa Policy?. African Studies Quarterly, 14(1–2), 77–96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tarrósy, I. & Solymári, D. (2022): Relations with the Global South, solidarity and pragmatism in Hungarian foreign policy since the 1960s – a focus on Africa. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 13(1), 106–122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
T.C. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı Bakanlığı [R.o.T. Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure] (2022): Ulaştırma ve Altyapı Bakanı Karaismailoğlu: Dörtlü Bakanlar Konseyi Kararıyla Demiryolu Taşımacılığı Çalışma Grubu Kurduk [Minister of Transport and Infrastructure Karaismailoğlu: We Established a Railway Transport Working Group with the Decision of the Quadrilateral Council of Ministers]. <accessed online: https://www.uab.gov.tr/haberler/ulastirma-ve-altyapi--bakani-karaismailoglu-dortlu-bakanlar-konseyi-karariyla-demiryolu-tasimaciligi-calisma--grubu-kurduk.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terényi, J. (2002): Magyarország külkapcsolati stratégiája az ázsiai és csendes -óceáni térségben [Hungary’s foreign relations strategy in the Asia and Pacific region]. Külügyi Szemle [Foreign Affairs Review], (2), 7–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tzvetkova, G. (2018): Principled pragmatism as an emergent US foreign policy tradition. Diplomacy/, (21), 171–184.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vasa, L. (2021): A Türk Tanács közép -ázsiai és kaukázusi országai a magyar külgazdaság perspektívájából [Caucasian and Central Asian Countries of the Turkic Council from the Perspective of Hungarian Foreign Economic Policy]. KKI Elemzések [KKI Policy Brief], 2021(08), 1–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Végh, Z. (2015): Hungary’s “Eastern Opening” policy toward Russia: ties that bind?. International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs, 24(1–2), 47–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Végh, Z. (2021): Central Europe’s Radical Right and EU Foreign Policy. Washington DC: German Marshall Fund of the United States.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zalewski, N. (2023): The Weaponization of NATO Membership: Leaders of Türkiye and Hungary Use Accession Process for Personal Disputes. Romanian Military Thinking, (3/2023), 110–125.
]Search in Google Scholar
