[
Akkerman, A. – Mudde, C. – Zaslove, A. (2014): How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters. Comparative Political Studies 47(9): 1324–1353.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anduiza, E. – Guinjoan, M. – Rico, G. (2018): Economic Crisis, Populist Attitudes, and the Birth of Podemos in Spain, in Giugni, M – Grasso, M., eds., Citizens and the Crisis. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology, 61–83, Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ardag, M. M et al. (2019): Populist Attitudes and Political Engagement: Ugly, Bad, and Sometimes Good? Representation 56(3): 307–330.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Art, D. (2022): The Myth of Global Populism. Perspectives on Politics 20(3): 999–1011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berman, S. (2021): The Causes of Populism in the West. Annual Review of Political Science 24(1): 71–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernhard, A. – Hänggli, R. (2018): Who Holds Populist Attitudes? Evidence from Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review 24(4): 510–524.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berning, C. – Ziller, C. (2017): Social trust and radical right-wing populist party preferences. Acta Politca 52: 198–217.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blanuša, N. (2013): Internal memory divided: Conspiratorial thinking, ideological and historical cleavages in Croatia; Lessons for Europe. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 2(4): 16–33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bovan, K. – Baketa, N. (2022): Stabilnost i/ili promjene? Povjerenje u institucije u Hrvatskoj od 1999. do 2020. Revija za sociologiju 52(1): 31–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bovens, M. – Wille, A. (2017): Diploma Democracy. The Rise of Political Meritocracy. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Briggs, S. R. – Cheek, J. M. (1986): The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality 54(1): 106–148.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brotherton, R. – French, C.C. – Pickering, A.D. (2013): Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: the generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in psychology 4: 1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canovan, M. (1981): Populism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castanho Silva, B. (2017): Contemporary Populism: Actors, Causes and Consequences Actors in 28 Democracies, PhD dissertation at Central European University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castanho Silva, B. – Vegetti, F. – Littvay, L. (2017): The Elite Is Up to Something: Exploring the Relation Between Populism and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Swiss Political Science Review 23(4): 423–443.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castanho Silva, B et al. (2018): Public opinion surveys: a new measure, in Hawkins, K. A et al., eds., The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis, 128–150, Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castanho Silva, B et al. (2020): An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales. Political Research Quarterly 73(2): 409–424.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castanho Silva, B. – Neuner, F. G. – Wratil, C. (2022): Populism and Candidate support in the US: The Effects of “Thin” and “Host” Ideology. Journal of Expertimental Political Science; 1–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clark, A.L. – Watson, D. (1995): Constructing Validity: Basic Issues in Objective Scale Development. Psychological Assessment 7(3): 309–319.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Čular, G. – Šalaj, B. (2019): Kritički građani ili nezadovoljni autokrati? Potpora demokraciji u Hrvatskoj 1999–2018. Anali Hrvatskog politološkog društva 16 (1): 7–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Douglas, K. M. (2021): COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 24(2): 270–275.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elchardus, M, – Spruyt, B. (2016): Populism, Persistent Republicanism and Declinism: An Empirical Analysis of Populism as a Thin Ideology. Government and Opposition 51(1): 111–133.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erisen, C. et al. (2021): Psychological Correlates of Populist Attitudes. Advances in Political Psychology 42(1): 149–171.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galais, C. – Rico, G. (2021): An unjustified bad reputation? The Dark Triad and support for populism. Electoral Studies 72: 1–6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grbeša, M. – Šalaj, B. (2018): Dobar, loš ili zao? Populizam u Hrvatskoj. TIM Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grbeša, M. – Šalaj B. (2019): Textual analysis: an inclusive approach in Croatia, in Hawkins, K. A et al., eds., The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis, 67–90 Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grbeša, M. – Volarević, M. (2021): Media in Croatia: from freedom fighters to tabloid avengers. Publizistik 66(3–4): 621–636.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J.F. – Black, W.C. – Babin, B.J. – Anderson, R.E. (2019): Multivariate Dana Analysis. Eight Edition. Cengage Learning EMEA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanley, S. – Sikk, A. (2014): Economy, corruption or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of anti-establishment reform parties in Eastern Europe. Party Politics 22(4): 522–533.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawkins, K.A. (2009): Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies 42(8): 1040–1067.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawkins, K. – Riding, S. – Mudde, C. (2012): Measuring Populist Attitudes. University of Georgia, C & M Working Paper No. 55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawkins, K. A. – Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017): The ideational approach to populism. Latin American Research Review 52(4): 513–528.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawkins, K.A. et al., ed. (2018): The Ideational Approach to Populism. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawkins, K.A – Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018): Introduction-Concept, Theory and Method, in Hawkins, K. A. et al., eds., The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis, 1–25, Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawkins, K.A – Littvay, L. (2019): Contemporary US Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawkins, K. – Rovira Kaltwasser, C. – Andreadis, I. (2020): The Activation of Populist Attitudes. Government and Opposition 55(2): 283–307.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henjak, A. (2005): Determinante ideološke samoidentifikacije birača na parlamentarnim izborima 2003. godine. Politička misao 42(1): 85–110.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henjak, A. (2007): Values or Interests: Economic Determinants of Voting Behaviour in the 2007 Croatian Parliamentary Elections. Politička misao, 44(5): 71–90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henjak, A. – Zakošek, N. – Čular, G. (2013): Croatia, in: Berglund, S. – Erman, J. – Deegan-Krause, K. – Knutsen, T., eds., Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, 443–481, Edward Elgar.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henjak, A. (2017): Institutional Trust and Democracy Satisfaction in Croatia: Partisanship-Versus Outcome-Driven Evaluations. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava 17 (3): 343–363.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henjak, A. (2018): Nose li parlamentarni izbori 2015. i 2016. godine promjenu političkih rascjepa u Hrvatskoj? Društvena istraživanja 27(3): 383–406.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henjak, A. – Vuksan-Ćusa, B. (2019): Interesi ili nešto drugo? Ekonomski stavovi i njihova utemeljenost u društvenoj strukturi u Hrvatskoj. Revija za sociologiju 49(1): 37–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoekstra, R. et al. (2019): An empirical analysis of alleged misunderstandings of coefficient alpha. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22(4): 351–364.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, L.-T. – Bentler, P. M. (1999): Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1): 1–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huber, R. A. – Fesenfeld, L. – Bernauer, T. (2020): Political populism, responsiveness, and public support for climate mitigation. Climate Policy 20(3): 73–386.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hunger, S. – Paxton, F. (2022): What’s in a buzzword? A systematic review of the state of populism research in political science. Political Science Research and Methods 10: 617–633.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Inglehart, R. (1997): Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Inglehart, R. – Welzel, C. (2005): Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge Univeristy Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Inglehart, R. – Norris, P. (2017): Trump and the Populist Authoritarian Parties: The Silent Revolution in Reverse. Perspectives on Politics 5(2): 443–454.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ionescu, G – Gellner, E., ed. (1969): Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jou, W. (2010): Continuities and changes in left-right orientations in new democracies: The cases of Croatia and Slovenia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43(1): 97–113.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kefford, G. – Moffitt, B. – Werner, A. (2021): Populist Attitudes: Bringing Together Ideational and Communicative Approaches. Political Studies (March, online first).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kline, R.B. (2011): Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Third Edition, The Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kriesi, H et al. (2006): Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 921–956.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lengyel, G. – Ilonszki, G. (2012): Simulated Democracy and Pseudo-Transformational Leadership in Hungary. Historical Social Research 37(1): 107–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margalit, Y. (2019): Economic Insecurity and the Causes of Populism, Reconsidered. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33(4): 152–170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meijers, M.J. – Zaslove, A. (2021): Measuring Populism in Political Parties: Appraisal of a New Approach. Comparative Political Studies 54(2): 372–407.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mohrenberg, S. – Huber, R.A., – Freyburg, T. (2019): Love at first sight? Populist attitudes and support for direct democracy. Party Politics 27(3): 528–539.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mudde, C. (2004): The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39(4): 541–563.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mudde, C. (2007): Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mudde, C. – Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012): Populism and (liberal) democracy: a framework for analysis, in Mudde, C. – Rovira Kaltwasser, C., eds., Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?, 1–27, Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mudde, C. – Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017): Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mudde, C. (2017): Populism: An Ideational Approach, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mudde, C. – Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018): Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda. Comparative Political Studies 51(13); 1667–1693.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neuner, F. G. – Wratil, C. (2022): The Populist Marketplace: Unpacking the role of “Thin” and “Thick” ideology. Political Behavior 44: 551–574.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nikić Čakar, D. – Čular, G. (2012): Whom to trust: Political scientists or voters? Left and right in party platforms and voters’ attitudes in Croatia 1990–2011, Paper presented at IPSA Conference.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nikodem, K. (2019): „Važno je imati moćnog vođu!“ Analiza autoritarnosti u hrvatskom društvu od 1999. do 2018. godine. Društvena istraživanja 28 (3): 391–410.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norris, P. – Inglehart, R. (2019): Cultural Backlash. Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oesch, D. (2008): Explaining Workers’ Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland. International Political Science Review 29(3): 349–373.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oliver, J. E. – Wood, T.J. (2014): Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion. American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 952–966.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oliver, J. E. – Rahn, W. M. (2016): Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667(1): 189–206.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ostiguy, P. (2017): Populism: A Socio-Cultural Approach, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pop-Eleches, G. (2010): Throwing Out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism. World Politics 62(2): 221–260.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raos, V. (2020): Struktura rascjepa i parlamentarni izbori u Hrvatskoj 2020. u doba pandemije. Anali Hrvatskog politološkog društva 17 (1): 7–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rico, G. – Guinjoan M., – Anduiza, E. (2017): Emotional Underpinnings of Populism: How Anger and Fear Affect Populist Attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review 23(4): 444–461.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rico, G. – Anduiza, E. (2019): Economic correlates of populist attitudes: an analysis of nine european countries in the aftermath of the great recession. Acta Politica 54: 371–397.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodrik, D. (2018): Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy 1(1): 12–33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roodujin, M. (2014): The Nucleus of Populism: In Search of the Lowest Common Denominator. Government and Opposition 49(4): 572–598.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roodujin, M. (2018): What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review 10(3): 351–368.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rose, R. – Mislher, W. (2010): Political trust and distrust in post-authoritarian contexts. University of Aberdeen: Studies in Public Policy No. 474.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2014): The Responses of Populism to Dahl’s Democratic Dilemmas. Political Studies 62(3): 470–487.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rovira Kaltwasser, C. et al. (2017): Populism: An Overview of the Concept and the State of the Art, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rovira Kaltwasser, C. – Van Hauwaert, S. (2020): The populist citizen: Empirical evidence from Europe and Latin America. European Political Science Review 12(1): 1–18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmitt, N. (1996): Uses and abuses of Coefficent Alpha. Psychological Assessment 8(4): 350–353.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spruyt, B. – Keppens, G. – Van Droogenbroeck F. (2016): Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It? Political Research Quarterly 69(2): 335–346.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Staerklé, C. – Green, E.G.T. (2018): Right-wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 28: 430–445.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stanley, B. (2011): Populism, nationalism, or national populism? An analysis of Slovak voting behaviour at the 2010 parliamentary election. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44 (4): 257–270.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stanley, B. (2017): Populism in Central and Eastern Europe, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šalaj, B. (2005): Socijalno povjerenje: Hrvatska 1995–2003. Anali Hrvatskog politološkog društva 2(1): 35–56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šiber, I. (1997).: Izborne orijentacije i ideologijski sukobi tijekom Drugoga svjetskog rata: Značenje političke biografije obitelji. Politička misao 34 (2): 104–128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šiber, I. (1998): Autoritarna ličnost, politički svjetonazor i stranačka preferencija. Politička misao 35 (4): 193–209.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taggart, P. (2000): Populism. Open University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taggart, P. (2002): Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics, in Mény, Y – Surel, Y., eds., Democracies and the Populist Challenge, 62–81, Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taggart, P. (2004): Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies 9(3): 269–288.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tonković, M. et al. (2021): Who Believes in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories in Croatia? Prevalence and Predictors of Conspiracy Beliefs. Frontiers in psychology 12: 643568.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsatsanis, E. – Andreadis, I. – Teperoglu, E. (2018): Populism from Below: Socio-economic and Ideological Correlates of Mass Attitudes in Greece. South European Society and Politics 23(4): 429–450.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Hauwaert, S.M. – Schimpf, C.H. – Azevedo, F. (2019): Evaluating existing survey measures of demand-side populism using IRT, in Hawkins, K. A et al., eds., The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis, 128–150, Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Hauwaert, S.M. – Van Kessel, S. (2018): Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research 57(1): 68–92.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Hauwaert, S.M. – Schimpf C.H., – Azevedo F. 2020. The measurement of populist attitudes: Testing cross-national scales using item response theory. Politics 40(1): 3–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Warren, M. (1999): Conclusion, in Warren, M., eds., Democracy and Trust, 346–360, Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watkins, M.W. (2018): Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology 44(3): 219–246.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wettstein, M. et al. (2020): Measuring Populism across Nations: Testing for Measurement Invariance of an Inventory of Populist Attitudes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 32(2): 284–305.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weyland, K. (2001): Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics 34(1): 1–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wuttke, A. – Schimpf, C., – Schoen H. (2020): When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs. American Political Science Review 114(2): 356–374.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zulianello, M. (2020): Varieties of Populist Parties and Party Systems in Europe: From State-of-the-Art to the Application of a Novel Classification Scheme to 66 Parties in 33 Countries. Government and Opposition 55(2): 327–347.
]Search in Google Scholar
