[
Abdou, Leila Hadj: From the Migration Crisis to the New Pact on Migration and Asylum – The Status Quo Problem. BRIDGE Network Working Paper 11, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Al-Kashef, Muhammad – Martin, Marie: EU ‑Egypt migration cooperation: at the expense of human rights. EuroMed Rights, 2019: available at: https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2019/jul/Report-on-EU-Egypt-cooperation-on-migration%20.pdf(5 th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauerová, Helena (2018): Migration Policy of the V4 in the Context of Migration Crisis. Politics in Central Europe 14(2): 99–119.10.2478/pce-2018-0011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauerová, Helena (2018): The V4 and European Integration. Politics in Central Europe 14(2): 121–139.10.2478/pce-2018-0012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burnay, Matthieu – Denecker, Matthias – Raube, Kolja – Hauck, Volker: Does the EU have the right instruments to finance assistance in protracted crises and the needs of upper middle income countries? European Parliament, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cappelletti, Mauro –Seccombe, Monica – Weiler, Joseph, eds. (1986): Integration Through Law: Europe and the American Federal Experience. Vol. 1: Methods, Tools and Institutions De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110909227
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cassarino, Jean -Pierre (2010): Readmission Policy in the European Union, European Parliament.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chmiel, Oskar J. (2018): The engagement of Visegrad countries in EU ‑Africa relations, Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik. Discussion Paper No. 24/2018: available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.23661/dp24.2018 (5th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Circolo, Andrea – Hamuľák, Ondrej – Lysina, Peter (2018): The Principle of Solidarity between Voluntary Commitment and Legal Constraint: Comments on the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Joined Cases C-643/15 and C-647/15. Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law 9: 155–173.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colombeau, Sara Casella (2019): Crisis of Schengen? The effect of two ‘migrant crises’ (2011 and 2015) on the free movement of people at an internal Schengen border. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42(5): 625–641.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Bruycker, Philippe – De Somer, Marie – De Brouwer, Jean -Louis, eds. (2019): From Tampere 20 to Tampere 2.0: Towards a new European consensus on migration. European Policy Centre.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drinóczi, Tímea – Mohay, Ágoston (2018): Has the Migration Crisis Challenged the Concept of the Protection of the Human Rights of Migrants? The Case of Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary, in Elżbieta, Kużelewska; Amy, Weatherburn; Dariusz, Kloza, eds., Irregular Migration as a Chal‑ lenge for Democracy, Intersentia, pp. 97–112.10.1017/9781780687025.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duszczyk, Maciej – Podgórska, Karolina – Dominika Pszczółkowska (2019): From mandatory to voluntary. Impact of V4 on the EU relocation scheme. European Politics and Society 21(4): 470–487.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Council of Refugees and Exiles (2020): Joint Statement: The Pact on Migration and Asylum: to provide a fresh start and avoid past mistakes, risky elements need to be addressed and positive aspects need to be expanded, 6 October 2020: available at: https://www.ecre.org/the-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-to-provide-a-fresh-start-and-avoid-past-mistakes-risky--elements-need-to-be-addressed-and-positive-aspects-need-to-be-expanded/(5 th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischl, Vilmos (2019): The Role of the Ecumenical Council of the Churches in Hungary in Aiding Persecuted Christians, in Kaló, József –Petruska, Ferenc – Ujházi, Lóránd, Budapest Report on Christian Persecution, Háttér Kiadó, 259–272.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Global Detention Project (2018): Country Report – Immigration Detention in the Czech Republic: “We Will Not Accept Even One More Refugee”, 2018: available at: https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Immigration-Detention-in-the-Czech-Republic--December-2018-Web.pdf (5th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Global Detention Project (2019): Country Report – Immigration Detention in Slovakia: Punitive Conditions Paid for by the Detainees. Global Detention Project, 2019: available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Immigration-Detention-in-Slovakia-Online-.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldner Lang, Iris (2020): No Solidarity without Loyalty: Why Do Member States Violate EU Migration and Asylum Law and What Can Be Done? European Journal of Migration and Law 22(1): 39–59.10.1163/15718166-12340068
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goździak, Elżbieta M. – Main, Izabella (2020): Contesting Flexible Solidarity: Poland and the “Migration Crisis”. Frontiers in Human Dynamics 2: 1–13.10.3389/fhumd.2020.562682
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hautzinger, Zoltán (2019): Migratory Impacts on Law Enforcement, in Hautzinger, Zoltán, ed., Dynamics and Social Impact of Migration, Dialóg -Campus, pp. 149–172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karabegović, Dženeta (2020): Visegrad Countries and Migration Leadership Potential: Contextu‑ alizing Opportunities in light of the New Pact on Migration and Asylum and Beyond. Institute of International Relations Prague – Think Visegrad V4 Think -Tank Platform: available at: https://think.visegradfund.org/wp-content/uploads/Karabegovic_2020.pdf,(5th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krist, Niels (2020): Protecting the Formal Rule of Law in the EU’s Asylum Policy: The CJEU’s Judgment in C-757/17 (The Asylum Relocation Mechanism). BRIDGE Network Blog, 19 May 2020: availableat:https://bridgenetwork.eu/2020/05/19/protecting-the-formal-rule-of-law-in--the-eus-asylum-policy-the-cjeus-judgment-in-c-757-17-the-asylum-relocation-mechanism (5th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2017): Relocation & Resettlement: Sharing Responsibility within the EU and Opening Legal Pathways to Europe, European Union.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament (2016): Cost of non ‑Schengen: the impact of border controls within Schen‑ gen on the Single Market. European Union: available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/578974/IPOL_STU(2016)578974_EN.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament (2020): MEPs to grill Frontex director on agency’s role inpushbacks of asylum ‑seekers. 30th November 2020: available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdfs/news/expert/2020/11/press_release/20201126IPR92509/20201126IPR92509_en.pdf (5th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2020): Migration: Fundamental rights issues at land borders. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glied, Viktor – Zamęcki, Łukasz (2021): Together, but still separated? Migration policy in the V4 countries. Politics in Central Europe 17(1S), 647–673.10.2478/pce-2021-0027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gyeney, Laura – Molnár, Tamás (2016): Asylum Policy of the European Union, in Láncos, Petra Lea – Debisso, Kinga – Gyeney, Laura – Szabó, Marcel, eds., Union Policies, Eleven International Publishing, 183–249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karamanidou, Lena – Kasparek, Bernd (2018): Border Management and Migration Control in the European Union, RESPOND Research report D2. 1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kováts, András (2016): Migrációs helyzetkép Magyarországon, in Tarrósy, István – Glied, Viktor – Vörös, Zoltán, eds., Migráció a 21. században, Publikon Kiadó, pp. 349–368.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monar, Jörg (2010): The ‘area of freedom, security and justice’: ‘Schengen’ Europe, opt -outs, opt -ins and associates, in Dyson, Kenneth – Sepros, Angelos, eds., Which Europe? The politics of differentiated integration, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 279–292.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karageorgiou, Eleni (2020): The New Pact on Migration and Asylum: Why Pragmatism Cannot Engender Solidarity. Nordic Journal of European Law, 3(2): III -VIII.10.36969/njel.v3i2.22396
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagy, Boldizsár (2016): Hungarian Asylum Law and Policy in 2015–2016: Securitization Instead of Loyal Cooperation. German Law Journal 17(6): 1033–1082.10.1017/S2071832200021581
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagy, Boldizsár (2017): Renegade in the Club – Hungary’s Resistance to EU Efforts in the Asylum Field. Osteuropa Recht 63(4): 413–427.10.5771/0030-6444-2017-4-413
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagy, Boldizsár (2020): A pyrrhic? Victory concerning detention in transit zones and procedural rights: FMS & FMZ and the legislation adopted by Hungary in its wake. EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy, 15th June 2020: available at: https://eumigrationlawblog.eu/a--pyrrhic-victory-concerning-detention-in-transit-zones-and-procedural-rights-fms-fmz-and--the-legislation-adopted-by-hungary-in-its-wake/(5 th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nyzio, Arkadiusz (2017): The Second Revival? The Visegrád Group and the European Migrant Crisis in 2015–2017. Politeja 50(5): 47–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pachocka, Marta (2016): Understanding the Visegrad Group States’ Response to the Migrant and Refugee Crises 2014+ in the European Union. Yearbook of Polish European Studies 19: 101–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pap, Norbert – Glied, Viktor – Reményi, Péter (2018): Two Faces of the Migration Crisis in Hungary, in Maria, Paradiso, ed., Mediterranean Mobilities: Europe’s Changing Relationships, Springer International Publishing, pp. 55–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollet, Kris (2019) All in vain? The fate of EP positions on asylum reform after the European elections. EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy, 23rd May 2019: available at: http://eumigrationlawblog.eu/all-in-vain-the-faith-of-ep-positions-on-asylum-reform-after-the--european-elections/(5 th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peers, Steve (2015): Relocation of Asylum ‑Seekers in the EU: Law and Policy. EU Law Analysis, 24th September 2015: available at: https://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/09/relocation--of-asylum-seekers-in-eu-law.html(5 th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Profant, Tomáš (2018): The Social Construction of Slovakia as a Donor and its Power Effects. Europe ‑AsiaStudies 70(3): 365–387.10.1080/09668136.2018.1453486
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Remek, Éva (2015): A V4 kül -és biztonságpolitikája, in Rajnai, Zoltán – Beatrix Fregan – Kuna Zsuzsanna Marosné – Judit Ozsváth, eds., Tanulmánykötet a 6. Báthory ‑Brassai Nemzetközi Kon‑ ferencia Előadásaiból, Óbudai Egyetem Biztonságtudományi Doktori iskola, pp. 1–2, 285–293.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rijpma, Jorrit (2016): The proposal for a European Border and Coast Guard: evolution or revolu‑ tion in external border management? European Union.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schütze, Robert (2015): EU Competences: Existence and Exercise, in Arnull, Anthony – Chalmers, Damien, eds., The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, Oxford University Press, pp. 75–102.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shaw, Malcolm N. (2017): International Law. Eighth Edition, Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stepper, Péter (2018): A kényszermigráció mint biztonsági kihívás Közép ‑Európában: Eltérő per‑ cepciók, közös álláspont a visegrádi országokban. Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sundberg Diez, Olivia – Trauner, Florian (2021): EU return sponsorships: High stakes, low gains. European Policy Centre.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szalai, Máté – Csornai, Zsuzsanna – Garai, Nikolett (2017): V4 Migration Policy: Conflicting Nar‑ ratives and Interpretative Framework. CIDOB Colección Monografías.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szczerbiak, Aleks (2017): How is the European migration crisis affecting Polish politics. EU‑ROPP: European Politics and Policy. 6th July 2017: available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/07/06/european-migration-crisis-affecting-polish-politics/(5 th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tarrósy, István – Vörös, Zoltán (2020): Hungary’s Pragmatic Foreign Policy in a Post-American World. Politics in Central Europe, 16(1): 113–134.10.2478/pce-2020-0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tóth, Norbert (2020): Tranzitzóna után, újabb jogi kihívások előtt? Horizont 2020/9, Migárciókutató Intézet: available at: https://www.migraciokutato.hu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/20200529_HORIZONT_9_toth_norbert_tranzitzona_ut%C3%A1n_ujabb_jogi_kihivasok_elott_elemzes.pdf (5th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vékony, Dániel (2021): Country Report Hungary, October 2019. GREASE – Religion, Diversity and Radicalisation: available at: http://grease.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2019/10/WP2-Mapping_Hungary-report_Daniel-Vekony-tcm2.pdf (5th March 2021)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weber, Bodo (2016): The European Refugee Crisis, the Balkan Route and the EU ‑Turkey Deal. Democratization Policy Council: available at: http://www.democratizationpolicy.org/pdf/DPC_Policy_Paper_Europ_refugee_crisis_EU_Turkey_deal.pdf (5th March 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
