Accès libre

Enhancing design–bid–build project delivery: A comprehensive review and framework for contractor selection and project optimisation in the construction industry

Mohammed Ali Almuhannadi
Mohammed Ali Almuhannadi
 et 
Ahmed Salem Ghareeb
Ahmed Salem Ghareeb
   | 11 juin 2024
Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Article Category: Research Paper
Publié en ligne: 11 juin 2024
Pages: 63 - 80
Reçu: 01 sept. 2023
Accepté: 27 févr. 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2024-0005
Mots clés
© 2024 Mohammed Ali Almuhannadi et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1

Data extraction PRISMA diagram. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Data extraction PRISMA diagram. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Fig. 2

Construction industry’s framework for project delivery (Source: Ahmed and El-Sayegh 2021).
Construction industry’s framework for project delivery (Source: Ahmed and El-Sayegh 2021).

Fig. 3

Framework for project delivery.
Framework for project delivery.

Framework for project delivery

Project delivery framework Pros Cons
DBB – Clearly defined roles– Competitive bidding– Separation of design and construction – Absence of cooperation– Possibility of ordering changes– Protracted project timetable
DB – One point of accountability– Improved cooperation– Expedited project completion– Possibility of cost reductions – Restricted owner authority– Possible restrictions on design– Modifications made when building– Restricted competitive bidding
CM – Early participation from the construction manager– Improved communication and collaboration.– Trade contractor selection and bid packaging– Optimisation and budgetary management – An increase in project management complexity– Possibility of higher project expenses– Possibility of conflicts and lawsuits– Construction manager’s little contribution to the design
CMAR – Heightened intricacy in project management– Possible rise in project expenses– Potential for disagreements and lawsuits– Construction Manager’s minimal design input – A rise in complexity– Risk of cost overruns– Conflict of interest possibility– Restricted contractor competition
IPD – Cooperation and unity– Early participation and proficiency– Sharing of risk and reward– Enhanced effectiveness and output – A rise in complexity– Extended project launch– Limited availability of seasoned IPD teams; difficulties in making decisions
Public–private partnership – Access to sector resources and knowledge Risk control– Effective project execution– Funding availability– Service and performance quality – Both time intensive and complex– Expensive transaction process with possible increases in costs– Restricted authority and adaptability– Possibility of unequal risk distribution

Results of different studies

Reference Sample size Methodology Research objective Framework studied Results
Ghadamsi and Braimah (2016) Mixed methodology (semi-structured survey and literature review) To assess how the DBB procurement selection criterion affects the success of the programme in Libya DBB The project performance criteria (time, cost and quality) are impacted by 11 of the 12 selection criteria
Ebenezer (2020) 350 Quantitative survey conducted by experts in construction To examine how Nigerian construction industry specialists view the performance quality of DB and DBB DBB and DB In terms of performance quality, DB performs better than DBB
Abou Chakra and Ashi (2019) 102 projects Survey questionnaire To compare Lebanon’s DBB and DB project delivery methods DBB and DB The DBB programmes perform effectively in terms of timeliness, security and ongoing inspection. The database projects, on the other hand, function better in terms of cost, communication, risk mitigation and material storage
Peng and Kim (2022) 55 projects Interviews that are semi-structured To compare DMC with DBB in terms of building intensity, time, and cost DMC and DBB DMC outperforms DBB in terms of construction performance, time and cost.
Yu et al. (2016) Review of the literature to develop a framework for assessing performance quality To assess the effectiveness of the DBB delivery mechanism in addition to the DB quality DBB and DB
Lu et al. (2017) 144 Questionnaire survey To evaluate the factors that affect database and DBB application cost performance overruns DBB and DB The DBB project delivery technique is heavily influenced by the owner’s ability, which might result in cost overruns
AL-Smadi and Hndawi (2021) Literature review To compare the project delivery approaches of DBB and DB in the Jordanian construction sector DB and DBB DB projects are a good way for the Jordanian construction sector to reduce risk
Calahorra-Jimenez et al. (2020) 41 professionals Interview survey and literature review To assess the reasons for cost overruns throughout DBB’s project phase DBB project Four elements have been identified as having the potential to lower cost overruns: accountability, goal-oriented selection process, efficient information interchange, and incorporation of the contractor’s experience in the procurement phase.
Ogechi (2017) Four case studies Research based on case study To compare the DBB and DB projects’ project-party relationships DBB and DB Compared to DBB projects, DB projects have stronger links throughout the project supplier chain
Edward et al. (2013) Secondary data from the Florida Department of Transportation Quantitative research To evaluate project delivery strategies in Florida based on their shortest duration and least expensive DBB and DB Programmes using DBB work well in terms of cost, whereas programmes using DB work better in terms of time
eISSN:
1847-6228
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
Volume Open
Sujets de la revue:
Engineering, Introductions and Overviews, other
RSS Feed de la revue