Four stages of making project management flexible: insight, importance, implementation and improvement

Aaker, D. A., & Mascarenhas, B. (1984). The need for strategic flexibility. The Journal of Business Strategy, 5, pp. 74.AakerD. A.MascarenhasB.1984The need for strategic flexibilityThe Journal of Business Strategy57410.1108/eb039060Search in Google Scholar

Abrahamsson, P., Warsta, J., Siponen, M. T., & Ronkainen, J. (2003). New directions on agile methods: A comparative analysis. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering 2003. Portland, OR, USA, 3–10 May 2003, IEEE, pp. 244–254.AbrahamssonP.WarstaJ.SiponenM. T.RonkainenJ.2003New directions on agile methods: A comparative analysisIn:Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering 2003Portland, OR, USA3–10 May 2003IEEE,24425410.1109/ICSE.2003.1201204Search in Google Scholar

Agile-Methodology. (2014). What is Scrum? [Online]. Available at: http://agilemethodology.org.Agile-Methodology2014What is Scrum?[Online]. Available at: http://agilemethodology.org.Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, R., Crawford, L., & Ward, S. (2006). Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, pp. 687–698.AtkinsonR.CrawfordL.WardS.2006Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project managementInternational Journal of Project Management2468769810.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.011Search in Google Scholar

Augustine, S., Payne, B., Sencindiver, F., & Woodcock, S. (2005). Agile project management: Steering from the edges. Communications of the ACM, 48, pp. 85–89.AugustineS.PayneB.SencindiverF.WoodcockS.2005Agile project management: Steering from the edgesCommunications of the ACM48858910.1145/1101779.1101781Search in Google Scholar

Bakhshi, J., Ireland, V., & Gorod, A. (2016). Clarifying the project complexity construct: Past, present and future. International Journal of Project Management, 34, pp. 1199–1213.BakhshiJ.IrelandV.GorodA.2016Clarifying the project complexity construct: Past, present and futureInternational Journal of Project Management341199121310.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Bateson, G. 1972. Ecology and flexibility in urban civilization. Steps to an Ecology of Mind, pp. 494–505.BatesonG.1972Ecology and flexibility in urban civilizationSteps to an Ecology of Mind494505Search in Google Scholar

Beck, K., Beedle, M., Bennekum, A. V., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., et al. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development [Online]. Available at https://agilemanifesto.org/ on Accessed 1 March, 2014.BeckK.BeedleM.BennekumA. V.CockburnA.CunninghamW.FowlerM.2001Manifesto for Agile Software Development[Online]. Available at https://agilemanifesto.org/ on Accessed 1 March, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Blaikie, N. (2009). Designing Social Research, Wiley, Cambridge, UK.BlaikieN.2009Designing Social ResearchWileyCambridge, UKSearch in Google Scholar

Blom, J. A. (2014). Embracing Change: The Road to Improvement? Master, Delft University of TechnologyBlomJ. A.2014Embracing Change: The Road to Improvement?Master, Delft University of TechnologySearch in Google Scholar

Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2003). Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston.BoehmB.TurnerR.2003Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the PerplexedAddison-Wesley ProfessionalBostonSearch in Google Scholar

Bosch-Rekveldt, M. (2011). Managing project complexity: A study into adapting early project phases to improve project performance in large engineering projects. Doctoral of Philosophy Delft University of TechnologyBosch-RekveldtM.2011Managing project complexity: A study into adapting early project phases to improve project performance in large engineering projectsDoctoral of Philosophy Delft University of TechnologySearch in Google Scholar

Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., & Verbraeck, A. (2011). Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The Toe (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29, pp. 728–739.Bosch-RekveldtM.JongkindY.MooiH.BakkerH.VerbraeckA.2011Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The Toe (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) frameworkInternational Journal of Project Management2972873910.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.008Search in Google Scholar

Boussauw, K., & Boelens, L. (2015). Fuzzy tales for hard blueprints: the selective coproduction of the Spatial Policy Plan for Flanders, Belgium. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, pp. 1376–1393.BoussauwK.BoelensL.2015Fuzzy tales for hard blueprints: the selective coproduction of the Spatial Policy Plan for Flanders, BelgiumEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy331376139310.1068/c12327Search in Google Scholar

Chan, H. K., & Chan, F. T. S. (2010). Comparative study of adaptability and flexibility in distributed manufacturing supply chains. Decision Support Systems, 48, pp. 331–341.ChanH. K.ChanF. T. S.2010Comparative study of adaptability and flexibility in distributed manufacturing supply chainsDecision Support Systems4833134110.1016/j.dss.2009.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Cobb, C. G. (2011). Making sense of agile project management: Balancing control and agility, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.CobbC. G.2011Making sense of agile project management: Balancing control and agilityJohn Wiley & SonsHoboken10.1002/9781118085950Search in Google Scholar

Collyer, S., & Warren, C. M. J. (2009). Project management approaches for dynamic environments. International Journal of Project Management, 27, pp. 355–364.CollyerS.WarrenC. M. J.2009Project management approaches for dynamic environmentsInternational Journal of Project Management2735536410.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Cooke-Davies, T., Cicmil, S., Crawford, L., & Richardson, K. (2008). We’re not in kansas anymore, Toto: Mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Engineering Management Review, IEEE, 36, pp. 5–21.Cooke-DaviesT.CicmilS.CrawfordL.RichardsonK.2008We’re not in kansas anymore, Toto: Mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project managementEngineering Management Review, IEEE3652110.1109/EMR.2008.4534312Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, London, UK.CreswellJ. W.2009Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods ApproachesSageLondon, UKSearch in Google Scholar

Geraldi, J. G. (2008). The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual model. International Journal of Project Management, 26, pp. 348–356.GeraldiJ. G.2008The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual modelInternational Journal of Project Management2634835610.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.013Search in Google Scholar

Giezen, M. (2012). Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. International Journal of Project Management, 30, pp. 781–790.GiezenM.2012Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planningInternational Journal of Project Management3078179010.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.010Search in Google Scholar

Gil, N., & Tether, B. S. (2011). Project risk management and design flexibility: Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity. Research Policy, 40, pp. 415–428.GilN.TetherB. S.2011Project risk management and design flexibility: Analysing a case and conditions of complementarityResearch Policy4041542810.1016/j.respol.2010.10.011Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, S. K., & Rosenhead, J. (1968). Robustness in sequential investment decisions. Management Science, 15, pp. B-18-B-29.GuptaS. K.RosenheadJ.1968Robustness in sequential investment decisionsManagement Science15B-18-B-2910.1287/mnsc.15.2.B18Search in Google Scholar

Harvett, C. M. (2013). A study of uncertainty and risk management practice relative to percieved project complexity. Doctor of Philosophy, Bond University.HarvettC. M.2013A study of uncertainty and risk management practice relative to percieved project complexityDoctor of Philosophy, Bond UniversitySearch in Google Scholar

Hashimoto, T., Stedinger, J. R., & Loucks, D. P. (1982). Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resources Research, 18, pp. 14–20.HashimotoT.StedingerJ. R.LoucksD. P.1982Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluationWater Resources Research18142010.1029/WR018i001p00014Search in Google Scholar

Hertogh, M. (2014). Opportunity Framing Management of Engineering Projects: People are the Key. Nijkerk, The Netherland NAP (The process industry competence network).HertoghM.2014Opportunity Framing Management of Engineering Projects: People are the KeyNijkerk, The Netherland NAP (The process industry competence network)Search in Google Scholar

Hertogh, M., Baker, S., Staal-Ong, P., & Westerveld, E. (2008). Managing large infrastructure projects. Research on Best Practices and Lessons Learnt in Large Infrastructure Projects in Europe, AT Osborne BV, The Netherlands.HertoghM.BakerS.Staal-OngP.WesterveldE.2008Managing large infrastructure projects. Research on Best Practices and Lessons Learnt in Large Infrastructure Projects in EuropeAT Osborne BVThe NetherlandsSearch in Google Scholar

Hertogh, M., & Westerveld, E. (2010). Playing with complexity - Management and organization of large infrastructure projects. Doctor of Philosophy Erasmus Universiteit RotterdamHertoghM.WesterveldE.2010Playing with complexity - Management and organization of large infrastructure projectsDoctor of Philosophy Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam10.1007/978-3-642-21192-8_5Search in Google Scholar

Highsmith, J. A. (2002). Agile Software Development Ecosystems. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston.HighsmithJ. A.2002Agile Software Development EcosystemsAddison-Wesley ProfessionalBostonSearch in Google Scholar

Huchzermeier, A., & Loch, C. H. (2001). Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R… D. Management Science, 47, pp. 85–101.HuchzermeierA.LochC. H.2001Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R… DManagement Science478510110.1287/mnsc.47.1.85.10661Search in Google Scholar

Jalali Sohi, A. (2018). Flexibility in project management: Towards improving project performance. Doctoral Delft University of Technology.Jalali SohiA.2018Flexibility in project management: Towards improving project performanceDoctoral Delft University of TechnologySearch in Google Scholar

Jalali Sohi, A., Bosch-Recveldt, M., & Hertogh, M. (2018). Practitioners’ perspectives on flexible project management. IEEE Transaction in Engineering Management, In press.Jalali SohiA.Bosch-RecveldtM.HertoghM.2018Practitioners’ perspectives on flexible project managementIEEE Transaction in Engineering ManagementIn press.10.1109/TEM.2019.2914833Search in Google Scholar

Jalali Sohi, A., Hertogh, M., & Bosch-Rekveldt, M. (2016). Scrum in practice for infrastructure projects EURAM 2016. Paris.Jalali SohiA.HertoghM.Bosch-RekveldtM.2016Scrum in practice for infrastructure projects EURAM 2016ParisSearch in Google Scholar

Kellenbrink, C., & Helber, S. (2015). Scheduling resource-constrained projects with a flexible project structure. European Journal of Operational Research, 246, pp. 379–391.KellenbrinkC.HelberS.2015Scheduling resource-constrained projects with a flexible project structureEuropean Journal of Operational Research24637939110.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.003Search in Google Scholar

Koppenjan, J., Veeneman, W., Van Der Voort, H., Ten Heuvelhof, E., & Leijten, M. (2011). Competing management approaches in large engineering projects: The Dutch RandstadRail project. International Journal of Project Management, 29, pp. 740–750.KoppenjanJ.VeenemanW.Van Der VoortH.Ten HeuvelhofE.LeijtenM.2011Competing management approaches in large engineering projects: The Dutch RandstadRail projectInternational Journal of Project Management2974075010.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Kreiner, K. (1995). In search of relevance: Project management in drifting environments. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11, pp. 335–346.KreinerK.1995In search of relevance: Project management in drifting environmentsScandinavian Journal of Management1133534610.1016/0956-5221(95)00029-USearch in Google Scholar

Layton, M. (2010). Agile Project Management for Dummies, For Dummies.LaytonM.2010Agile Project Management for DummiesFor Dummies.Search in Google Scholar

Olsson, N. O. E. (2006). Management of flexibility in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24, pp. 66–74.OlssonN. O. E.2006Management of flexibility in projectsInternational Journal of Project Management24667410.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.010Search in Google Scholar

Osipova, E., & Eriksson, P. E. (2013). Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31, pp. 391–399.OsipovaE.ErikssonP. E.2013Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projectsInternational Journal of Project Management3139139910.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Owen, R., Koskela, L., Henrich, G., & Codinhoto, R. (2006). Is agile project management applicable to construction? In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, pp. 51–66.OwenR.KoskelaL.HenrichG.CodinhotoR.2006Is agile project management applicable to construction?In:Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction5166Search in Google Scholar

Perminova, O., Gustafsson, M., & Wikström, K. (2008). Defining uncertainty in projects–a new perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 26, pp. 73–79.PerminovaO.GustafssonM.WikströmK.2008Defining uncertainty in projects–a new perspectiveInternational Journal of Project Management26737910.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.005Search in Google Scholar

Priemus, H., & van Wee, B. (2013). International Handbook on Mega-projects. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton.PriemusH.van WeeB.2013International Handbook on Mega-projectsEdward Elgar PublishingNorthampton10.4337/9781781002308Search in Google Scholar

Sager, T. (1990). Notions of Flexibility in Planning-Related Literature. Nordic Institute for Studies in Urban and Regional Planning, Stockholm.SagerT.1990Notions of Flexibility in Planning-Related LiteratureNordic Institute for Studies in Urban and Regional PlanningStockholmSearch in Google Scholar

Smith, D., & Irwin, A. (2006). Complexity, risk and emergence: elements of a “management” dilemma. Risk Management, 8, pp. 221–226.SmithD.IrwinA.2006Complexity, risk and emergence: elements of a “management” dilemmaRisk Management822122610.1057/palgrave.rm.8250024Search in Google Scholar

Terryn, E., Boelens, L., & Pisman, A. (2016). Beyond the divide: Evaluation in co-evolutionary spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 24, pp. 1079–1097.TerrynE.BoelensL.PismanA.2016Beyond the divide: Evaluation in co-evolutionary spatial planningEuropean Planning Studies241079109710.1080/09654313.2016.1154019Search in Google Scholar

Turner, J. R. (2004). Five necessary conditions for project success. International Journal of Project Management, 22, pp. 349–350.TurnerJ. R.2004Five necessary conditions for project successInternational Journal of Project Management2234935010.1016/j.ijproman.2004.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Vidal, L.-A., Marle, F., & Bocquet, J.-C. (2011). Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Project Management, 29, pp. 718–727.VidalL.-A.MarleF.BocquetJ.-C.2011Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessInternational Journal of Project Management2971872710.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, W. L. (1971). The Logic of Science in Sociology [Sound Recording]. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick & London.WallaceW. L.1971The Logic of Science in Sociology [Sound Recording]Transaction PublishersNew Brunswick & LondonSearch in Google Scholar

Williams, T. (2005). Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 52, pp. 497–508.WilliamsT.2005Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overrunsEngineering Management, IEEE Transactions on5249750810.1109/TEM.2005.856572Search in Google Scholar

Wysocki, R. K. (2007). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Adaptive, Extreme. Wiley Pub, Indianapolis, IN.WysockiR. K.2007Effective Project Management: Traditional, Adaptive, ExtremeWiley PubIndianapolis, INSearch in Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods. In: Applied Social Research Methods. Sage Publications, Inc., Los Angeles, p. 5.YinR. K.2002Case study research: Design and methodsIn:Applied Social Research MethodsSage Publications, Inc.Los Angeles5Search in Google Scholar