This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Aven, T. (2010). On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 95(No. 6), pp. 623–631. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.011.AvenT.2010On how to define, understand and describe risk956623631http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.01110.1016/j.ress.2010.01.011Search in Google Scholar
Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), pp. 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023.AvenT.2016Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation2531113http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.02310.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023Search in Google Scholar
Baloi, D., & Price, A. D. F. (2003). Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), pp. 261–269. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-0.BaloiD.PriceA. D. F.2003Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance214261269http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-010.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-0Search in Google Scholar
Banaitienė, N., Banaitis, A., & Norkus, A. (2011). Risk management in projects: peculiarities of Lithuanian construction companies. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 15(1), pp. 60–73. http://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2011.568675.BanaitienėN.BanaitisA.NorkusA.2011Risk management in projects: peculiarities of Lithuanian construction companies1516073http://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2011.56867510.3846/1648715X.2011.568675Search in Google Scholar
Carter, A. and Chinyio, E. (2010), “Effectiveness of risk management : Barriers and solutions”, in PM-05 Advancing Project Management for the 21st Century: Concepts, Tools & Techniques for Managing Successful Projects, Crete, Greece, pp. 135–143.CarterA.ChinyioE.2010“Effectiveness of risk management : Barriers and solutions”, in PM-05 Advancing Project Management for the 21st CenturyCrete, Greece135143Search in Google Scholar
Clive, K. (2014). How to Develop Meaningful Key Performance Indicators. Intrafocus.CliveK.2014IntrafocusSearch in Google Scholar
Corona-Suárez, G., AbouRizk, S. M. and Karapetrovic, S. (2014), “Simulation-Based Fuzzy Logic Approach to Assessing the Effect of Project Quality Management on Construction Performance”, Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering, Article ID 203427, 18 pages. http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/203427.Corona-SuárezG.AbouRizkS. M.KarapetrovicS.2014“Simulation-Based Fuzzy Logic Approach to Assessing the Effect of Project Quality Management on Construction Performance”Article ID 203427, 18 pages. http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/203427.10.1155/2014/203427Search in Google Scholar
Dallas, M. (2008). Value & Risk Management (A Guide to Best Practice). Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.DallasM.2008Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKSearch in Google Scholar
Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M. T., Anac, C., Tah, J. H. M., & Aouad, G. (2008). Learning from risks: A tool for post-project risk assessment. Automation in Construction, 18(1), pp. 42–50. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.04.008.DikmenI.BirgonulM. T.AnacC.TahJ. H. M.AouadG.2008Learning from risks: A tool for post-project risk assessment1814250http://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.04.00810.1016/j.autcon.2008.04.008Search in Google Scholar
Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), pp. 79–119. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001.Franco-SantosM.LucianettiL.BourneM.2012Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research23279119http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.00110.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Hajdu, M., & Bokor, O. (2016). Sensitivity analysis in PERT networks: Does activity duration distribution matter? Automation in Construction, 65, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.01.003.HajduM.BokorO.2016Sensitivity analysis in PERT networks: Does activity duration distribution matter?6518https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.01.00310.1016/j.autcon.2016.01.003Search in Google Scholar
Hillson, D. (2007). Understanding the risk management universe – Consensus and Controversy. In: Hillson, D. (ed.), The Risk Management Universe: A Guided Tour. BSI Standards, London.HillsonD.2007Understanding the risk management universe – Consensus and ControversyIn:HillsonD.(ed.)BSI StandardsLondon10.3403/9780580503467Search in Google Scholar
Hillson, D. (2009). Managing Risk in Projects (Fundamentals of Project Management). Grower Publishing Limited, Surrey, England.HillsonD.2009Grower Publishing LimitedSurrey, EnglandSearch in Google Scholar
Howard, R. and Serpell, A. (2012), “Procurement management: analyzing key risk management factors”, in RICS Cobra 2012, Las Vegas, USA, pp. 1461–1469.HowardR.SerpellA.2012“Procurement management: analyzing key risk management factors”inLas Vegas, USA14611469Search in Google Scholar
Hubbard, D. W. (2009). The Failure of Risk Management. John Wiley and Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ.HubbardD. W.2009John Wiley and Sons IncHoboken, NJSearch in Google Scholar
Hubbard, D. W. (2010). How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Hoboken.HubbardD. W.2010John Wiley & Sons LtdHoboken10.1002/9781118983836Search in Google Scholar
Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1993). Putting the Balanced Scorecard to work, Harvard Business Review, September – October, pp. 134–147.KaplanR.NortonD.1993Harvard Business ReviewSeptember – October134147Search in Google Scholar
Kennerly, M., & Neely, A. (2004). Performance measurement frameworks: A review. In: Neely, A. (ed.), Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753695.010.KennerlyM.NeelyA.2004Performance measurement frameworks: A reviewIn:NeelyA.(ed.)Cambridge University PressCambridge, UK145154https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753695.01010.1017/CBO9780511753695.010Search in Google Scholar
Khameneh, A.-H., Taheri, A., & Ershadi, M. (2016). Offering a framework for evaluating the performance of project risk management system. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp. 82–90. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspro.2016.06.165.KhamenehA.-H.TaheriA.ErshadiM.2016Offering a framework for evaluating the performance of project risk management system2268290http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspro.2016.06.16510.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.165Search in Google Scholar
Lee, E., Park, Y., & Shin, J. G. (2009). Large engineering project risk management using a Bayesian belief network. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), pp. 5880–5887. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.057.LeeE.ParkY.ShinJ. G.2009Large engineering project risk management using a Bayesian belief network36358805887http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.05710.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.057Search in Google Scholar
Likierman, A. (2007). In: Neely, A. (ed.), Risk in performance measurement. Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488481.016.LikiermanA.2007In:NeelyA.(ed.)Cambridge University PressNew Yorkhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488481.01610.1017/CBO9780511488481.016Search in Google Scholar
Malcom, D. G., Roseboom, J. H., Clark, C. E., & Fazar, W. (1959). Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation. Operations Research, 7(5), pp. 646–669.MalcomD. G.RoseboomJ. H.ClarkC. E.FazarW.1959Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation7564666910.1287/opre.7.5.646Search in Google Scholar
Marcelino-Sádaba, S., Pérez-Ezcurdia, A., Echeverría Lazcano, A. M., & Villanueva, P. (2014). Project risk management methodology for small firms. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), pp. 327–340. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.009.Marcelino-SádabaS.Pérez-EzcurdiaA.Echeverría LazcanoA. M.VillanuevaP.2014Project risk management methodology for small firms322327340http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.00910.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.009Search in Google Scholar
Melnyk, S. A., Bititci, U., Platts, K., Tobias, J., & Andersen, B. (2014). Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? Management Accounting Research, 25(2), pp. 173–186. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007.MelnykS. A.BititciU.PlattsK.TobiasJ.AndersenB.2014Is performance measurement and management fit for the future?252173186http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.00710.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007Search in Google Scholar
Mikes, A. and Kaplan, R. (2013), Towards a Contingency Theory of Enterprise Risk Management, No. 13–063). Harvard Business School. Retrieved from http://www.hec.unil.ch/documents/seminars/dcc/1102.pdf.MikesA.KaplanR.2013No. 13–063)Harvard Business SchoolRetrieved from http://www.hec.unil.ch/documents/seminars/dcc/1102.pdf.10.2139/ssrn.2311293Search in Google Scholar
NASA. (2011). NASA Risk Management Handbook. Washington, D.C.NASA2011Washington, D.CSearch in Google Scholar
Osipova, E., & Eriksson, P. E. (2013). Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), pp. 391–399. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.007.OsipovaE.ErikssonP. E.2013Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projects313391399http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.00710.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Papadaki, M., Gale, A., Rimmer, J. and Kirkham, R. (2010), “Factors Influencing Project Risk Management Decision Making”, in PM-05 Advancing Project Management for the 21st Century: Concepts, Tools & Techniques for Managing Successful Projects, Crete, Greece, pp. 536–544.PapadakiM.GaleA.RimmerJ.KirkhamR.2010“Factors Influencing Project Risk Management Decision Making”inCrete, Greece536544Search in Google Scholar
Pimchangthong, D., & Boonjing, V. (2017). Effects of Risk Management Practices on IT Project Success. Management and Production Engineering Review, 8(1), pp. 30–37. http://doi.org/10.1515/mper-2017-0004.PimchangthongD.BoonjingV.2017Effects of Risk Management Practices on IT Project Success813037http://doi.org/10.1515/mper-2017-000410.1515/mper-2017-0004Search in Google Scholar
Ren, Y., Yeo, K. T., & Ren, Y. (2014). Risk Management Capability Maturity and Performance of Complex Product and System (CoP) Projects with an Asian Perspective. Journal of Engineering, Project and Production Management, 4(2), pp. 81–98.RenY.YeoK. T.RenY.2014Risk Management Capability Maturity and Performance of Complex Product and System (CoP) Projects with an Asian Perspective42819810.32738/JEPPM.201407.0004Search in Google Scholar
Serpell, A., Ferrada, X., Howard, R. and Rubio, L. (2014), “Risk management in construction projects: a knowledge-based approach”, in 27th IPMA (International Project Management Association) World Congress, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 1–5.SerpellA.FerradaX.HowardR.RubioL.2014“Risk management in construction projects: a knowledge-based approach”inDubrovnik, Croatia1510.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.073Search in Google Scholar
Standars Australia. (2007). AS/NZS 4360:2004 Risk Management. Standars Australia, New Zealand.Standars Australia2007Standars AustraliaNew ZealandSearch in Google Scholar
Szymański, P. (2017). Risk management in construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 208, pp. 174–182. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.036.SzymańskiP.2017Risk management in construction projects208174182http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.03610.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.036Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, A., & Taylor, M. (2014). Factors influencing effective implementation of performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and large firms: a perspective from Contingency Theory. International Journal of Production Research, 52(3), pp. 847–866. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.842023.TaylorA.TaylorM.2014Factors influencing effective implementation of performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and large firms: a perspective from Contingency Theory523847866http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.84202310.1080/00207543.2013.842023Search in Google Scholar
Tohidi, H. (2011). The role of risk management in IT systems of organizations. Procedia Computer Science, 3, pp. 881–887. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.144.TohidiH.2011The role of risk management in IT systems of organizations3881887http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.14410.1016/j.procs.2010.12.144Search in Google Scholar
Van Slyke, R. (1963). Monte Carlo methods and the PERT Problem. Operations Research, 11(5), pp. 839–860.Van SlykeR.1963Monte Carlo methods and the PERT Problem11583986010.1287/opre.11.5.839Search in Google Scholar
Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), pp. 97–105. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1.WardS.ChapmanC.2003Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management21297105http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-110.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1Search in Google Scholar
Washington State Department of Transportation (2014), Project Risk Management Guide, Washington State Department of Transportation.Washington State Department of Transportation2014Washington State Department of TransportationSearch in Google Scholar
Wolbers, M. (2009), Application of risk management in Public Works organizations in Chile, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile/University of Twente.WolbersM.2009Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile/University of TwenteSearch in Google Scholar
Zaleha, S., Rasid, A., Golshan, N. M., Khairuzzaman, W. and Ismail, W. (2012), “Risk Management, Performance measurement and Organizational performance: A Conceptual Framework”, in 3rd International Conference on Business and Economic Research, Bandung, Indonesia, pp. 1702–1715.ZalehaS.RasidA.GolshanN. M.KhairuzzamanW.IsmailW.2012in3rd International Conference on Business and Economic ResearchBandung, Indonesia17021715Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. (2016). Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk interdependence. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), pp. 819–830. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.001.ZhangY.2016Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk interdependence345819830http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.00110.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.001Search in Google Scholar
Zou, P. X. W., Zhang, G., & Wang, J. (2007). Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), pp. 601–614. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001.ZouP. X. W.ZhangG.WangJ.2007Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China256601614http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.00110.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001Search in Google Scholar