Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources
Édition 29 (2018): Edition 3 (September 2018)
Accès libre
Data mining methods of healthy indoor climate coefficients for comfortable well-being
Grit Behrens
Grit Behrens
,
Klaus Schlender
Klaus Schlender
et
Florian Fehring
Florian Fehring
| 01 sept. 2018
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources
Édition 29 (2018): Edition 3 (September 2018)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Publié en ligne:
01 sept. 2018
Pages:
7 - 12
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2018-0013
Mots clés
Big data
,
Web-based application
,
indoor air quality
,
machine learning
,
artificial intelligence
,
neural network
,
ventilation behaviour
© 2018 Grit Behrens, Klaus Schlender, Florian Fehring, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
Network topology of measuring sensor systems.
Figure 2
Example of a measuring system in an apartment.
Figure 3
Visual display unit logging personal room climate feelings AQF.
Figure 4
Interpolation and normalisation within reciprocal transformations.
Figure 5
Correlation matrix on winter datasets.
Figure 6
Correlation matrix on summer datasets.
Figure 7
Comparing suitability of AIDIN-winter according to the DIN standard.
Figure 8
Comparing suitability of AIextended-winter according to the air feeling.
Figure 9
Comparing suitability of AIDIN-summer according to the DIN standard.
Figure 10
Comparing suitability of AIextended-summer according to the air feeling.
Overview of minima and maxima of collected measurement datasets for winter and summer season.
Features
Unit
Winter ranges
Summer ranges
STwindow
[state]
0.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
RHin
[%]
14.27
77.10
35.71
67.45
p
[hPa]
960.33
1029.31
1006.13
1015.32
Tair
[ºC]
15.89
28.66
21.48
28.93
Wout
[km/h]
0.00
11.40
0.10
2.35
Tout
[ºC]
−10.50
17.60
14.70
32.70
RHout
[%]
22.20
99.00
30.70
86.20
CO2
[ppm]
350.00
6865.00
400.00
1230.00
Theat
[ºC]
14.13
54.44
22.56
28.94
Twall
[ºC]
8.50
27.31
24.13
32.06
AQF
[state]
0.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
Ranges of sensor data as good, neutral and bad.
DIN standard ranges for winter
Features
Unit
Range good
Range neutral
Range bad
RHin
[%]
40
68
40
62
<40
>70
Tair
[ºC]
21
23
20
24
<20
>24
CO
2
[ppm]
0
1,000
1,000
2,000
2,000
>2,000
Twall
[ºC]
13
23
23
35
>13
>35
DIN standard ranges for summer
Features
Unit
Range good
Range neutral
Range bad
RHin
[%]
40
62
40
55
<40
>70
Tair
[ºC]
23.50
25.50
22
26
<22
>26
CO
2
[ppm]
0
1,000
1,000
2,000
2,000
>2,000
Twall
[ºC]
13
23
23
35
>13
>35