[Aunins, A. & Priednieks, J. 2003. Bird population changes in Latvian farmland, 1995–2000: responses to different scenarios of rural development. – Ornis Hungarica 12–13: 41–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barthos, Gy. 1917. Adatok a fürj magassági elterjedéséhez [Data on the distribution of Quail]. – Aquila 24: 276. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Batáry, P. & Báldi, A. 2004. Evidence of an edge effect on avian nest success. – Conservation Biology 18(2): 389–400. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00184.x10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00184.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Batáry, P., Matthiesen, T. & Tscharntke, T. 2010. Landscape-moderated importance of hedges in conserving farmland bird diversity of organic vs. conventional croplands and grasslands. – Biological Conservation 143: 2020–2027. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.00510.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Báldi, A. 2008. Az agrárgazdálkodás változásának hatása madarakra: európai és hazai körkép [The effects of changes in agriculture on birds: a review for Europe and Hungary]. – Ornis Hungarica 15–16: 75–75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Báldi, A. & Batáry, P. 2011. The past and future of farmland birds in Hungary. – Bird Study 58(3): 365–377. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2011.58868510.1080/00063657.2011.588685]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Báldi, A. & Faragó, S. 2007. Long-term changes of farmland game populations in a post-socialist country (Hungary). – Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118(1–4): 307–311. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.02110.1016/j.agee.2006.05.021]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bán, T. & Igmándy, J. 1939. Hajdúnánás fészkelő madarai [Breeding birds of Hajdúnánás]. – Aquila 42–45: 669–671. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[BirdLife International 2018. Species factsheet: Coturnix coturnix. – Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 30/09/2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Broyer, J. 1996. Les “fenaisons centrifuges”, une méthode pour réduire la mortalité des jeunes râles de genêts Crex crex et des cailles des blés Coturnix coturnix [«Centrifugal mowing», a method to reduce the mortality of young Corncrakes Crex crex and Common Quails Coturnix coturnix]. – Revue d’Écologie 51(3): 269–276. (in French)10.3406/revec.1996.2208]Search in Google Scholar
[Capdevila, J., Puigcerver, M., López, S., Pérez-Masdeu, E., García-Galea, E. & Rodríguez-Teijeiro, J. D. 2016. The role of nest site selection and cereal production in differential nest predation in Common Quail Coturnix coturnix and hybrid quail C. coturnix x C. japonica. – Ibis 158(4): 784–795. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12390.10.1111/ibi.12390]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chamberlain, D. E. & Fuller, R. J. 2000. Local extinctions and changes in species richness of lowland farmland birds in England and Wales in relation to recent changes in agricultural land-use. – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 78(1): 1–17. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00105-X10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00105-X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. – Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37–46. DOI: 10.1177/00131644600200010410.1177/001316446002000104]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Combreau, O. & Guyomarc’h, J. C. 1989. Évolution de la sélectivité alimentaire chez la caille des blés captive en période estivale [Variation of food selectivity in captive Common Quail in summer]. – Cahiers d’Éthologie Appliquée 9(3): 321–338. (in French)]Search in Google Scholar
[Combreau, O. & Guyomarc’h, J. C. 1992. Energy intake, breeding success and growth in captive European Quail (Coturnix coturnix coturnix) in relation to diet. – Gibier Faune Sauvage 9: 677–692.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cramp, S. (ed.) 1980. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: The Birds of Western Palearctic, Vol. II. – Oxford University Press, pp. 496–503.]Search in Google Scholar
[Debreceni, Ö., Drozd, A., György, I. & Urbán, S. 1990. Áttelelő fürj (Coturnix coturnix) Jászkarajenő határában [Overwintering Quail at the border of Jászkarajenő]. – Madártani Tájékoztató júl–dec.: 25. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Donald, P. F., Green, R. E. & Heath, M. F. 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. – Proceedings of the Royal Society B 268(1462): 25–29. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.132510.1098/rspb.2000.1325108759612123294]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Donald, P. F., Sanderson, F. J., Burfield, I. J. & Van Bommel, F. P. J. 2006. Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990–2000. – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 116(3–4): 189–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.02.00710.1016/j.agee.2006.02.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Eggers, S., Unell, M. & Pärt, T. 2011. Autumn-sowing of cereals reduces breeding bird numbers in a heterogeneous agricultural landscape. – Biological Conservation 144: 1137–1144. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.03310.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.033]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Erdős, S., Báldi, A. & Batáry, P. 2009. Nest site selection and breeding ecology of Skylarks Alauda arvensis in Hungarian farmland. – Bird Study 56(2): 259–263. DOI: 10.1080/0006365090279198310.1080/00063650902791983]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Faragó, S. 2002. Vadászati állattan [Hunting Zoology]. – Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Faragó, S. 2012a A Lajta project – Egy tartamos mezei vad és ökoszisztéma vizsgálat 20 éve [The Lajta Project – 20 years’ long-term investigation of small game and agrarian ecosystems]. – Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem Kiadó, Sopron (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Faragó, S. 2012b Fürj – Coturnix coturnix [Common Quail – Coturnix coturnix]. – In: Faragó S. (ed.) Nyugat-Magyarország fészkelő madarainak elterjedési atlasza [Atlas of the breeding bird of Western Hungary]. – Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetemi Kiadó, Sopron, p. 57. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Faragó, S., Dittrich, G., Horváth-Hangya, K. & Winkler, D. 2012. Twenty years of the Grey Partridge population in the LAJTA Project (Western Hungary). – Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 35(2): 311–319.10.32800/abc.2012.35.0311]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuller, R. (ed.) 2012. Birds and Habitat: Relationships in Changing Landscapes (Ecological Reviews). – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge DOI: 10.1017/CBO978113902165410.1017/CBO9781139021654]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gál, J. & Marosán, M. 2003. Studies on the biometry, foraging- and reproductive biology of the Quail (Coturnix coturnix, Linnaeus 1758) in Hungary. – Acta Agronomica Óváriensis 50(2): 43–51.]Search in Google Scholar
[George, K. 1990. Zu den Habitatansprüchen der Wachtel (Coturnix coturnix) [On the habitat requirements of the Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix)]. – Acta Ornithologica 2(2): 133–142. (in German)]Search in Google Scholar
[George, K. 1996. Habitatnutzung und Bestandssituation der Wachtel (Coturnix coturnix) in Sachsen-Anhalt [Habitat use, density and population changes of Quail (Coturnix coturnix) in Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany]. – Vogelwelt 117: 205–211. (in German)]Search in Google Scholar
[Glutz Von Blotzheim, U. N., Bauer, K. M. & Bezzel, E. (eds.) 1994. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Band 5 [Handbook of the birds of Central Europe, Vol. 5.]. – Aula-Verlag GmbH, Wiesbaden]Search in Google Scholar
[Green, R. E. & Stowe, T. J. 1993. The decline of the Corncrake in Britain and Ireland in relation to habitat change. – Journal of Applied Ecology 30(4): 689–695. DOI: 10.2307/240424710.2307/2404247]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Guyomarc’h, J. C. 2003. Elements for a Common Quail (Coturnix c. coturnix) management plan. – Game and Wildlife Science 20: 1–92.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guyomarc’h, J. C., Combreau, O., Pugicerver, M., Fontoura, P., Aebischer, N. J. & Wallace, D. I. M. 1998. Coturnix coturnix Quail. – BWP Update 2: 27–46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hadarics, T. & Zalai, T. 2008. Nomenclator Avium Hungariae [An annotated list of the birds of Hungary]. – MME, Budapest, pp. 65–66. (in Hungarian and English)]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, L. S., Krausman, P. R. & Morrison, M. L. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. – Wildlife Society Bulletin 25(1): 173–182.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hinsley, S. A. & Bellamy, P. E. 2000. The influence of hedge structure, management and landscape context on the value of hedgerows to birds: a review. – Journal of Environmental Management 60(1): 33–49. DOI: 10.1006/jema.2000.036010.1006/jema.2000.0360]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Holland, J., Smith, B., Birkett, T. & Southway, S. 2012. Farmland bird invertebrate food provision in arable crops. – Annals of Applied Biology 160(1): 66–75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00521.x10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00521.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[IBM Corp. Released, 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. – IBM Corp., Armonk, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jánoska, F. 1998. Fészkelő madárközösségek vizsgálata kisalföldi erdősávokban [Breeding bird communities of forest belts in the Kisalföld, Hungary]. – Ornis Hungarica 8(Suppl. 1): 49–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keve, A. 1955. Külföldi gyűrűs madarak kézrekerülései. XVIII. gyűrűzési jelentés [Records of Birds ringed in abroad and found in Hungary. XVIIIth Report on Ringing]. – Aquila 59–62: 275–285. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Keve, A., Zsák, Z. & Kaszab, Z. 1953. A fürj gazdasági jelentősége [The agricultural significance of the Quail]. – Természettudományi Évkönyv 4: 197–209. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovács, B. 1965. Adatok Hajdú-Bihar megye madárvilágához [Data on the avifauna of Hajdú-Bihar County]. – A Debreceni Déri Múzeum Évkönyve 1965: 363–381. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovács, G. 2005. Fürj (Coturnix coturnix) előfordulása vízi élőhelyeken [Occurrence of Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix) in wetlands]. – Aquila 112: 221. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Külley, J. 1924. Telelő fürj [Wintering Quail]. – Aquila 30–31: 301. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Landis, R. J. & Koch, G. G. 1977. The measurement of observed agreement for categorical data. – Biometrics 33: 159–174. DOI: 10.2307/252931010.2307/2529310]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MME 2018. Magyarország madarai: Fürj [Birds of Hungary: Common Quail]. – http://www.mme.hu/magyarorszagmadarai/madaradatbazis-cotcot Downloaded: 2018-10-01 (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[McGowan, P. J. K., de Juana, E. & Boesman, P. 1994. Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix). – In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D. A. & de Juana, E. (eds.) Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 2. – Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain, p. 509.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michailov, H. D. 1995. A study on the ecology and biology of Quail Coturnix coturnix (L. 1758) in the higher fields of western Bulgaria. – Thesis Summary of Dissertation, The Higher Institute of Forestry and Wood Technology, Department of Wildlife Management, Sofia]Search in Google Scholar
[Moreby, S. J. & Aebischer, N. J. 1992. Invertebrate abundance on cereal fields and set-aside land: implications for wild gamebird chicks. – British Crop Protection Council Monographs 50: 181–186.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morelli, F. 2013. Relative importance of marginal vegetation (shrubs, hedgerows, isolated trees) surrogate of HNV farmland for bird species distribution in Central Italy. – Ecological Engineering 57: 261–266. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.04.04310.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.04.043]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Morris, D. W. 1999. Has the ghost of competition passed? – Evolutionary Ecology Research 1: 3–20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morris, D. W. 2003. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. – Oecologia 136(1): 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1241-410.1007/s00442-003-1241-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Morris, D. W. & Davidson, D. L. 2000. Optimally foraging mice match patch use with habitat differences in fitness. – Ecology 81(8): 2061–2066. DOI: 10.2307/17709510.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2061:OFMMPU]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Németh, T. M. & Winkler, D. 2017. The impact of unmown refuge-strips on the breeding site fidelity of Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix) – a case study. – Hungarian Small Game Bulletin 13: 289–296. DOI: 10.17243/mavk.2017.28910.17243/mavk.2017.289]Search in Google Scholar
[Németh, T. M., Winkler, D. & Faragó, S. 2014. The Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix Linnaeus, 1758) population of the Lajta Project during the period of 2013–2014. – Hungarian Small Game Bulletin 12: 125–134. DOI: 10.17243/mavk.2014.12510.17243/mavk.2014.125]Search in Google Scholar
[Panek, M. 1997. The effect of agricultural landscape structure on food resources and survival of Grey Partridge Perdix perdix chicks in Poland. – Journal of Applied Ecology 34(3): 787–792. DOI: 10.2307/240492310.2307/2404923]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Panek, M. 1998. Use of habitat by Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix) in western Poland. – In: Birkan, M., Smith, L. M., Aebischer, N. J., Purroy, F. J. & Robertson, P. A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Perdix VII. Symposium on Partridges, Quails and Pheasants. – Gibier Faune Sauvage, Game & Wildlife 15: 407–412.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paton, P. W. 1994. The effect of edge on avian nest success: How strong is the evidence? – Conservation Biology 8: 17–26. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010017.x10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010017.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Perennou, C. 2009. European Union Management Plan 2009–2011, Common Quail, Coturnix coturnix. – European Commission, Brussels]Search in Google Scholar
[Puigcerver, M., Rodriguez-Teijeiro, J. D. & Gallego, S. 1999. The effects of rainfall on wild populations of Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix). – Journal für Ornithologie 140(3): 335–340. DOI: 10.1007/BF0165103010.1007/BF01651030]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Puigcerver, M., Vinyoles, D. & Rodríguez-Teijeiro, J. D. 2007. Does restocking with Japanese quail or hybrids affect native populations of Common Quail Coturnix coturnix? – Biological Conservation 136(4): 628–635. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.00710.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rands, M. R. W. 1986. Effect of hedgerow characteristics on partridge breeding densities. – Journal of Applied Ecology 23(2): 479–487. DOI: 10.2307/240403010.2307/2404030]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rapos, P. 1957. Fürj késői költése [Late breeding of Quail]. – Aquila 63–64: 276. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodríguez-Teijeiro, J. D., Sardà-Palomera, F., Alves, I., Bay, Y., Beça, A., Blanchy, B., Borgogne, B., Bourgeon, B., Colaço, P., Gleize, J., Guerreiro, A., Maghnouj, M., Rieutort, C., Roux, D. & Puigcerver, M. 2010. Monitoring and management of Common Quail Coturnix coturnix populations in their atlantic distribution area. – Ardeola 57: 135–144.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenzweig, M. L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. – Ecology 62(2): 327–335. DOI: 10.2307/193670710.2307/1936707]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Saint-Jalme, M. & Guyomarc’h, J. C. 1989. Recent changes in population dynamics of European Quail in the western part of its breeding range. – In: Myrberget, S. (ed.) Transactions of the XIXth Congress of the International Union Game Biologists. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 130–135.]Search in Google Scholar
[SAS Institute Inc. 2012. JMP Version 10.0. – SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szép, T., Nagy, K., Nagy, Zs. & Halmos, G. 2012. Population trends of common breeding and wintering birds in Hungary, decline of long-distance migrant and farmland birds during 1999–2012. – Ornis Hungarica 20(2): 13–63. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2013-000710.2478/orhu-2013-0007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Szűts, B. 1898. Fürj januáriusban Szatmár-vármegyében [January Occurrence of Quail in Szatmár county]. – Természettudományi Közlöny 30(343): 165. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Tryjanowski, P., Hartel, T., Báldi, A., Szymański, P., Tobolka, M., Herzon, I., Goławski, A., Konvička, M., Hromada, M., Jerzak, L., Kujawa, K., Lenda, M., Orłowski, G., Panek, M., Skórka, P., Sparks, T., Tworek, S., Wuczyński, A. & Żmihorski, M. 2011. Conservation of farmland birds faces different challenges in Western and Central-Eastern Europe. – Acta Ornithologica 46(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.3161/000164511X58985710.3161/000164511X589857]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Udvardy, M. 1941. A Hortobágy madárvilága [Birds of Hortobágy]. – Tisia 5: 92–169. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Vickery, J., Carter, N. & Fuller, R. J. 2002. The potential value of managed cereal field margins as foraging habitats for farmland birds in the UK. – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 89(1–2): 41–52. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00317-610.1016/S0167-8809(01)00317-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Voříšek, P., Jiguet, F., van Strien, A., Škorpilová, J., Klvanová, A. & Gregory, R. D. 2010. Trends in abundance and biomass of widespread European farmland birds: How much have we lost? – BOU Proceedings – Lowland Farmland Birds III. pp. 1–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilson, J. D., Morris, A. J., Arroyo, B. E., Clark, S. C. & Bradbury, R. B. 1999. A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 70(1–2): 13–20. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00064-X10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00064-X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wretenberg, J., Lindström, A., Svensson, S., Thierfelder, T. & Part, T. 2006. Population trends of farmland birds in Sweden and England: similar trends but different patterns of agricultural intensification. – Journal of Applied Ecology 43(6): 1110–1120. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01216.x10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01216.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar