[
Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the organizational change literature: A model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), 234–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0215
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Al-Tahat, M. D., & Jalham, I. S. (2015). A structural equation model and a statistical investigation of lean-based quality and productivity improvement. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(3), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0816-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amjad, A., Azam, F., Anwar, M. W., Butt, W. H., & Rashid, M. (2018). Event-driven process chain for modeling and verification of business requirements – a systematic literature review. Ieee Access, 6, 9027–9048. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2791666
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Antony, J. (2006). Six Sigma for service processes. Business Process Management Journal, 12(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610657558
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Astakhov, V. P. (2012). Design of experiment methods in manufacturing: Basics and practical applications. In J. P. Davim (Ed.), Statistical and Computational Techniques in Manufacturing (1–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25859-6_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014). Lean manufacturing: Literature review and research issues. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(7), 876–940. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2012-0315
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boutros, T., & Cardella, J. (2016). The basics of process improvement. CRC Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiarini, A. (2011). Japanese total quality control, TQM, Deming’s system of profound knowledge, BPR, Lean and Six Sigma: Comparison and discussion. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2(4), 332–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461111189425
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crema, M., & Verbano, C. (2013). Guidelines for overcoming hospital managerial challenges: A systematic literature review. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 9, 427–441. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S54178
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Debevc, I., Svetec, P., & Krhač Andrašec, E. (2018). Učinkovitost in uspešnost organizacije skozi uporabo različnih metodologij, konceptov in pristopov [The efficiency and effectiveness of the organization through the use of different methodologies, concepts and approaches]. In O. Arsenijević, I. Podbregar, P. Šprajc, D. Trivan, & Y. Ziegler (Eds.), 37th International Conference on Organizational Science Development. Organization and uncertainty in the digital age (217–233). Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru. https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-146-9.18
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. A. (2013). Fundamentals of business process management (1st ed.). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. A. (2018). Fundamentals of business process management (2nd ed.). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galof, K., Balantič, Z. (2021). Making the decision to stay at home: developing a community-based care process model for aging in place. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115987
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gálová, K., Rajnoha, R., & Ondra, P. (2018). The use of industrial lean management methods in the economics practice: An empirical study of the production companies in the Czech Republic. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.17.1.08
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habib, M. N., & Shah, A. (2013). Business process reengineering: Literature review of approaches and applications. Proceedings of 3rd Asia-Pacific Business Research Conference, Malaysia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hellsten, U., & Klefsjö, B. (2000). TQM as a management system consisting of values, techniques and tools. The TQM Magazine, 12(4), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780010325822
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Inês Dallavalle de Pádua, S., Mascarenhas Hornos da Costa, J., Segatto, M., Aparecido de Souza Júnior, M., & José Chiappetta Jabbour, C. (2014). BPM for change management: two process diagnosis techniques. Business Process Management Journal, 20(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2013-0039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jafari, S. M., & Setak, M. (2010). Total quality management tools and techniques: The quest for an implementation roadmap. Proceedings of the AGBA 7th World Congress, Malaysia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kern, T. (2017). Vrste in oblike poslovnih sistemov in poslovnih procesov [Types and forms of business systems and business processes]. Faculty of Organizational Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, C. S., Spahlinger, D. A., Kin, J. M., & Billi, J. E. (2006). Lean health care: what can hospitals learn from a world‐class automaker?. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 1(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.68
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krhač Andrašec, E. (2022). Vpliv uporabe metod in tehnik izboljševanja poslovnih procesov na učinkovitost organizacijskih sistemov [Business process improvement methods and techniques and their impact on the efficiency of organizational systems]. Doctoral dissertation. University of Maribor.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lahajnar, S., & Rožanec, A. (2015). Primerjava metodologij za menedžment poslovnih procesov. Uporabna informatika, 23(4), 226–238.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maletič, D., Grabowska, M., & Maletič, M. (2023). Drivers and barriers of digital transformation in asset management. Management and Production Engineering Review, 14(1), 118-126. https://doi.org/10.24425/mper.2023.145370
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massingham, P., & Al Holaibi, M. (2017). Embedding knowledge management into business processes. Knowledge and Process Management, 24(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1534
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mežnar, D. (2021). System design of a vehicle based on the matrix approach using functional analysis of the maintenance. Processes, 9(5), 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050897
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morton, S. M. B., Bandara, D. K., Robinson, E. M., & Atatoa Carr, P. E. (2012). In the 21st century, what is an acceptable response rate?. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36(2), 106–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00854.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nickerson, W. (2014). Business process improvement methodologies: common factors and their respective efficacies. Doctoral dissertation. University of Gloucestershire.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noori, B., & Latifi, M. (2018). Development of Six Sigma methodology to improve grinding processes: A change management approach. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-11-2016-0074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oxford University Press (2021). Oxford English Dictionary. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pettersen, J. (2009). Defining lean production: some conceptual and practical issues. The TQM Journal, 21(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730910938137
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raosoft (2004). Sample size calculator. http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shin, N., & Jemella, D. F. (2002). Business process reengineering and performance improvement: The case of Chase Manhattan Bank. Business Process Management Journal, 8(4), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150210435008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soković, M., Jovanović, J., Krivokapić, Z., & Vujović, A. (2009). Basic quality tools in continuous improvement process. Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 55(5), 333–341.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soni, S., Mohan, R., Bajpai, L., & Katare, S. K. (2013). Reduction of welding defects using Six Sigma techniques. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 2(3), 404–412. https://doi.org./10.18178/ijmerr
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stevenson, W. J. (2015). Operations management (12th ed). McGraw - Hill Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valiris, G., & Glykas, M. (1999). Critical review of existing BPR methodologies: The need for a holistic approach. Business Process Management Journal, 5(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637159910249117
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2013) Business process management: A comprehensive survey. ISRN Software Engineering, 2013, 507984. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/507984
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van der Aalst, W. M. P., La Rosa, M., & Santoro, F. M. (2016). Business process management: Don’t forget to improve the process!. Business & Information Systems Engineering 58(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0409-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vila, A. (2006). Sintetizirana organizacija. In V. Rajkovič (Ed.), 25th International Conference on Organizational Science Development. Change management (1–12). Moderna organizacija.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Warner, C. J., Walsh, D. B., Horvath, A. J., Walsh, T. R., Herrick, D. P., Prentiss, S. J., & Powell, R. J. (2013). Lean principles optimize on-time vascular surgery operating room starts and decrease resident work hours. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 58(5), 1417–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weske, M., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Verbeek, H. M. W. (2004). Advances in business process management. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 50(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2004.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weske, M. (2007). Business process management: Concepts, languages, architectures (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73522-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xiang, J., Archer, N., & Detlor, B. (2014). Business process redesign project success: The role of socio-technical theory. Business Process Management Journal, 20(5),773–792. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2012-0112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zare Mehrjerdi, Y. (2011). Six‐Sigma: methodology, tools and its future. Assembly Automation, 31(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445151111104209
]Search in Google Scholar
