[1. Zielczyński, M., Golnik, N., & Rusinowski, Z. (1996). A computer controlled ambient dose equivalent meter based on a recombination chamber. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Dect. Assoc. Equ., 370(2/3), 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(95)01013-0.10.1016/0168-9002(95)01013-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[2. Zielczyński, M., & Golnik, N. (1994). Recombination index of radiation quality – measuring and applications. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 52, 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082226.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082226]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Golnik, N., Gryziński, M. A., Kowalska, M., Meronka, K., & Tulik, P. (2014). Characterization of radiation field for irradiation of biological samples at nuclear reactor – comparison of twin detector and recombination methods. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 161(1/4), 196–200. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct341.10.1093/rpd/nct34124366246]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Golnik, N. (1996). Recombination methods in the dosimetry of mixed radiation. Swierk, Poland: Institute of Atomic Energy. (Report IEA-20/A).]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Golnik, N., Silari, M., & Otto, T. (1999). On the use of a recombination chamber for radiation measurements in CERN-EU high-energy reference radiation fields. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 86(3), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032940.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032940]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Silari, M., Agosteo, S., Beck, P., Bedogni, R., Cale, E., Caresana, M., Domingo, C., Donadille, L., Dubourg, N., Esposito, A., Fehrenbacher, G., Fernandez, F., Ferrarini, M., Fiechtner, A., Fuchs, A., Garcia, M. J., Golnik, N., Gutermuth, F., Khurana, S., Klages, Th., Latocha, M., Mares, V., Mayer, S., Radon, T., Reithmeier, H., Rollet, S., Roos, H., Ruhm, W., Sandri, S., Schardt, D., Simmer, G., Spurny, F., Trompier, F., Villa-Grassa, C., Weitzenegger, E., Wiegel, B., Wielunski, M., Wissmann, F., Zechner, A., & Zielczyński, M. (2009). Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument response. Radiat. Meas., 44(7/8), 673–691. DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.05.005.10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.05.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Golnik, N., Brede, H. J., & Guldbakke, S. (1997). H*(10) response of the REM-2 recombination chamber in monoenergetic neutron fields. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 74(3), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032189.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032189]Search in Google Scholar
[8. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1983). Microdosimetry. ICRU Publications. Bethesda. (ICRU Report 36).]Search in Google Scholar
[9. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1993). Quantities and units in radiation protection dosimetry. ICRU Publications. Bethesda. (ICRU Report 51).]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Leuthold, G., Mares, V., & Schraube, H. (1992). Calculation of the neutron ambient dose equivalent on the basis of the ICRP revised quality factors. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 40(2), 77–84.]Search in Google Scholar