[1. Artioli, C., Grasso, G., & Petrovich, C. (2010). A new paradigm for core design aimed at the sustainability of nuclear energy: the solution of the extended equilibrium state. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 37, 915–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2010.03.016.10.1016/j.anucene.2010.03.016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[2. Oettingen, M., Cetnar, J., & Mirowski, T. (2015). The MCB code for numerical modeling of fourth generation nuclear reactors. Comput. Sci., 16(4), 329–350.10.7494/csci.2015.16.4.329]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Stanisz, P., Oettingen, M., & Cetnar, J. (2016). Monte Carlo modeling of Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor in adiabatic equilibrium state. Nucl. Eng. Des., 301, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.02.025.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.02.025]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Stanisz, P., Cetnar, J., & Domańska, G. (2015). Modeling minor actinide multiple recycling in a lead-cooled fast reactor to demonstrate a fuel cycle without long-lived nuclear waste. Nukleonika, 60(3), 581–590. DOI: 10.1515/nuka-2015-0111.10.1515/nuka-2015-0111]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Cetnar, J., Stanisz, P., & Domańska, G. (2013). Adiabatic fuel cycle assessment of LFR core with MOX using MCB system. Study for the LEADER project of European Union’s 7th FP EURATOM. Kraków: AGH University, WEiP. (KEJ/2013/4).]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Cetnar, J., Stanisz, P., & Domańska, G. (2013). Transition to the adiabatic-LFR: preliminary definition of the start-up core and MA-burning capabilities evaluation. Report for the LEADER project of European Union’s 7th FP EURATOM. Kraków: AGH University, WeiP. (KEJ/2013/5).]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Cetnar, J. (2006). General solution of Bateman equations for nuclear transmutations. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 33, 640–645. DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.004.10.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Cinotti, L., Smith, C. F., Siennicki, J. J., Abderrahim, H. A., Benamati, G., Locatelli, G., Monti, S., Wider, H., Struwe, D., Orden, A., & Hwang, S. (2007). The potential of the LFR and the ELSY project. In International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2007): The nuclear renaissance at work. Proceedings of a meeting held 13–18 May 2007, Nice, France (Vol. 5, pp. 3231–3240). Societe Francaise d’Energie Nucleaire (SFEN).]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Mills, R. W. (2007). Future requirements of nuclear data for the handling, reprocessing and disposal of spent nuclear fuel. In International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology. DOI: 10.1051/ndata:07730.10.1051/ndata:07730]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Döderlein, C., Tucek, K., Cetnar, J., Grasso, G., & Stanisz, P. (2012). Definition of the ELFR core and neutronic characterization, Lead-cooled European Advanced Demonstrator Reactor. European Commission Directorate-General JRC. (DEL 005-2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[11. OECD NEA Data Bank. (2006). Processing of the JEFF-3.1 Cross Section Library into Continuous Energy Monte Carlo Radiation Transport and Criticality Data Library. (NEA/NSC/DOC18).]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Firestone, R. B., Shirley, V., Baglin, C., Chu, S., & Zipkin, J. (1996). Table of isotopes 8E. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Mills, R. W. (2008). Nuclear data for the handling, reprocessing and disposal of spent nuclear fuel. UK: Nexia Solutions Ltd., Sellafield Works.10.1051/ndata:07730]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Bays, S., Piet, S., Pope, M., Youinou, G., Dumontier, A., & Hawn, D. (2009). Transmutation dynamics: Impacts of multi-recycling on fuel cycle performances. Idaho National Laboratory. (INL/EXT-09 16857).10.2172/966169]Search in Google Scholar
[15. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. (2015). Review of integral experiments for minor actinide management. (NEA no. 7222).]Search in Google Scholar