The Rhetorical Handling and Construction of Uncertainty in Tax Litigation Concerning Valuation of Financial Instruments

Almgren, Karin and Börje Leidhammar. 2016. Skatteprocessen [The tax process]. Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer. AlmgrenKarin LeidhammarBörje 2016 Skatteprocessen [The tax process] Stockholm Wolters Kluwer Search in Google Scholar

Bazelon, David L. 1981. “Science and Uncertainty: A Jurist's View.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 5: 209–215. BazelonDavid L. 1981 “Science and Uncertainty: A Jurist's View.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 5 209 215 Search in Google Scholar

Bazerman, Charles. 1985. “Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema.” Written communication 2 (1): 3–23. BazermanCharles 1985 “Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema.” Written communication 2 1 3 23 Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Linda L. 2008. “How embedded knowledge structures affect judicial decision making: A rhetorical analysis of metaphor, narrative, and imagination in child custody disputes.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 18: 259–308. BergerLinda L. 2008 “How embedded knowledge structures affect judicial decision making: A rhetorical analysis of metaphor, narrative, and imagination in child custody disputes.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 18 259 308 Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia, Vijay. (2002). “Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model.” Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para fines específicos (AELFE) 4: 3–19. BhatiaVijay 2002 “Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model.” Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para fines específicos (AELFE) 4 3 19 Search in Google Scholar

Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage. CharmazKathy 2006 Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis London Sage Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Winnie and Le Cheng. 2014. “Epistemic modality in court judgments: A corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland.” English for Specific Purposes 33: 15–26. ChengWinnie ChengLe 2014 “Epistemic modality in court judgments: A corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland.” English for Specific Purposes 33 15 26 Search in Google Scholar

Clemen, Gudrun. 1997. “The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions.” In Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts, edited by Raija Markkanen and Hartmut Schröder, 235–248. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ClemenGudrun 1997 “The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions.” In Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts edited by MarkkanenRaija SchröderHartmut 235 248 Berlin Walter de Gruyter Search in Google Scholar

Corley, Pamela C. and Justin Wedeking. 2014. “The (dis) advantage of certainty: The importance of certainty in language.” Law & Society Review 48 (1): 35–62. CorleyPamela C. WedekingJustin 2014 “The (dis) advantage of certainty: The importance of certainty in language.” Law & Society Review 48 1 35 62 Search in Google Scholar

Crompton, Peter. 1997. “Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (4): 271–287. CromptonPeter 1997 “Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems.” English for Specific Purposes 16 4 271 287 Search in Google Scholar

Czarniawska-Joerges, Barbara & Bernward Joerges. 1988. “How to control things with words: Organizational talk and control.” Management Communication Quarterly 2 (2): 170–193. Czarniawska-JoergesBarbara JoergesBernward 1988 “How to control things with words: Organizational talk and control.” Management Communication Quarterly 2 2 170 193 Search in Google Scholar

Diesen, Christian. 2003. Bevis 7 Bevisprövning i förvaltningsmål [Evidence 7 Evidence testing in litigation]. Stockholm: Norstedts juridik. DiesenChristian 2003 Bevis 7 Bevisprövning i förvaltningsmål [Evidence 7 Evidence testing in litigation] Stockholm Norstedts juridik Search in Google Scholar

Edin, Per-Olof and Sven-Olof Lodin. 2008. “En analys av en felaktig analys av 3:12-reglerna.” [An analysis of an incorrect analysis of the 3:12 rules]. Ekonomisk Debatt 36: 55–66. EdinPer-Olof LodinSven-Olof 2008 “En analys av en felaktig analys av 3:12-reglerna.” [An analysis of an incorrect analysis of the 3:12 rules] Ekonomisk Debatt 36 55 66 Search in Google Scholar

Ekström, Simon. 2003. “Att tala sanning.” [To speak the truth]. Tidsskrift for kulturforskning 2 (3): 5–21. EkströmSimon 2003 “Att tala sanning.” [To speak the truth] Tidsskrift for kulturforskning 2 3 5 21 Search in Google Scholar

Enough, Birte and Thomas Mussweiler. 2001. “Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the courtroom 1.” Journal of applied social psychology 31 (7): 1535–1551. EnoughBirte MussweilerThomas 2001 “Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the courtroom 1.” Journal of applied social psychology 31 7 1535 1551 Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Lisa. 2004. “Language, translation and the problem of international accounting communication.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 17 (2): 210–248. EvansLisa 2004 “Language, translation and the problem of international accounting communication.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 17 2 210 248 Search in Google Scholar

Gold, Andrew S. 2006. “A Decision Theory Approach to the Business Judgment Rule: Reflections on Disney, Good Faith, and Judicial Uncertainty.” Maryland Law Review 66: 398–474. GoldAndrew S. 2006 “A Decision Theory Approach to the Business Judgment Rule: Reflections on Disney, Good Faith, and Judicial Uncertainty.” Maryland Law Review 66 398 474 Search in Google Scholar

Hamer, David. 1994. “The civil standard of proof uncertainty: Probability, belief and justice.” Sydney Law Review 16: 506–536. HamerDavid 1994 “The civil standard of proof uncertainty: Probability, belief and justice.” Sydney Law Review 16 506 536 Search in Google Scholar

Higdon, Michael J. 2009. “Something Judicious This Way Comes... The Use of Foreshadowing as a Persuasive Device in Judicial Narrative.” University of Richmond Law Review 44: 1213–1260. HigdonMichael J. 2009 “Something Judicious This Way Comes... The Use of Foreshadowing as a Persuasive Device in Judicial Narrative.” University of Richmond Law Review 44 1213 1260 Search in Google Scholar

Hilling, Axel, Niklas Sandell and Anders Vilhelmsson. 2017. “Tax Planning in Partner-owned Close Corporations.” Nordic Tax Journal 1 (1): 108–120. HillingAxel SandellNiklas VilhelmssonAnders 2017 “Tax Planning in Partner-owned Close Corporations.” Nordic Tax Journal 1 1 108 120 Search in Google Scholar

Hilling, Axel, Niklas Sandell and Anders Vilhelmsson. 2018. “Lagen är lika för alla, men är alla verkligen lika inför lagen? En studie av Skatteverkets processföring i PwC-målet.” [The law is equal for everyone, but is everyone really equal before the law? A study of the Swedish Tax Agency's litigation in the PwC case] Förvaltningsrättslig tidskrift 2: 269–286. HillingAxel SandellNiklas VilhelmssonAnders 2018 “Lagen är lika för alla, men är alla verkligen lika inför lagen? En studie av Skatteverkets processföring i PwC-målet.” [The law is equal for everyone, but is everyone really equal before the law? A study of the Swedish Tax Agency's litigation in the PwC case] Förvaltningsrättslig tidskrift 2 269 286 Search in Google Scholar

Hilling, Axel, Niklas Sandell and Anders Wilhelmsson. 2019. “The Pricing of Financial Instruments in Tax Disputes.” Derivatives & Financial Instruments 21 (2). HillingAxel SandellNiklas WilhelmssonAnders 2019 “The Pricing of Financial Instruments in Tax Disputes.” Derivatives & Financial Instruments 21 2 Search in Google Scholar

Hinkle, Rachael K., Andrew D. Martin, Jonathan D. Shaub and Emerson H. Tiller. 2012. “A positive theory and empirical analysis of strategic word choice in district court opinions.” Journal of Legal Analysis 4 (2): 407–444. HinkleRachael K. MartinAndrew D. ShaubJonathan D. TillerEmerson H. 2012 “A positive theory and empirical analysis of strategic word choice in district court opinions.” Journal of Legal Analysis 4 2 407 444 Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 1994. “Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks.” English for Specific Purposes 13 (3): 239–256. HylandKen 1994 “Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks.” English for Specific Purposes 13 3 239 256 Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 1996a. “Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles.” Written Communication 13 (2): 251–281. HylandKen 1996a “Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles.” Written Communication 13 2 251 281 Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 1996b. “Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles.” Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 433–454. HylandKen 1996b “Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles.” Applied Linguistics 17 4 433 454 Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 1998. “Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter.” The Journal of Business Communication 35 (2): 224–244. HylandKen 1998 “Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter.” The Journal of Business Communication 35 2 224 244 Search in Google Scholar

Jalilifar, Ali R. and Maryam Alavi. 2012. “Power and politics of language use: A survey of hedging devices in political interviews.” Journal of Teaching Language Skills 30 (3): 43–66. JalilifarAli R. AlaviMaryam 2012 “Power and politics of language use: A survey of hedging devices in political interviews.” Journal of Teaching Language Skills 30 3 43 66 Search in Google Scholar

Klimczak, Karol M. and Marta Dynel. 2018. “Evaluation markers and mitigators in analyst reports in light of market response to stock recommendations.” International Journal of Business Communication, 55 (3): 310–337. KlimczakKarol M. DynelMarta 2018 “Evaluation markers and mitigators in analyst reports in light of market response to stock recommendations.” International Journal of Business Communication 55 3 310 337 Search in Google Scholar

Klimczak, Karol M., Marta Dynel and Anna Pikos. 2016. “Goodwill impairment test disclosures under uncertainty.” Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems 15 (4): 639–660. KlimczakKarol M. DynelMarta PikosAnna 2016 “Goodwill impairment test disclosures under uncertainty.” Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems 15 4 639 660 Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1973. “Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.” Journal of philosophical logic 2 (4): 458–508. LakoffGeorge 1973 “Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.” Journal of philosophical logic 2 4 458 508 Search in Google Scholar

Lavin, Rune. 2020. Förvaltningsprocessrätt [The procedure of litigation]. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik AB. LavinRune 2020 Förvaltningsprocessrätt [The procedure of litigation] Stockholm Norstedts Juridik AB Search in Google Scholar

Lewin, Beverly A. 2005. “Hedging: an exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of ‘toning down’ in scientific texts.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (2): 163–178. LewinBeverly A. 2005 “Hedging: an exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of ‘toning down’ in scientific texts.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 2 163 178 Search in Google Scholar

Lindkvist, Gustav. 2016. Bevisfrågor i skatteprocessen: En översikt [Evidence issues in the tax process: an overview]. Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer. LindkvistGustav 2016 Bevisfrågor i skatteprocessen: En översikt [Evidence issues in the tax process: an overview] Stockholm Wolters Kluwer Search in Google Scholar

Longstaff, Francis A. (2018). “Valuing Thinly Traded Assets.” Management Science. 64 (8): 3868–3878. LongstaffFrancis A. 2018 “Valuing Thinly Traded Assets.” Management Science 64 8 3868 3878 Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics: Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. LyonsJohn 1977 Semantics: Volume 2 Cambridge Cambridge University Press Search in Google Scholar

Mattsson, Johan and Stefan Larsson. 2014. “Juridikens dolda tankestrukturer. Observationer av metaforbruk i den svenska civil-rätten.” Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 127 (05): 512–534. MattssonJohan LarssonStefan 2014 “Juridikens dolda tankestrukturer. Observationer av metaforbruk i den svenska civil-rätten.” Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 127 05 512 534 Search in Google Scholar

McLaren-Hankin, Yvonne. 2008. “We expect to report on significant progress in our product pipeline in the coming year’: Hedging forward-looking statements in corporate press releases.” Discourse Studies 10 (5): 635–654. McLaren-HankinYvonne 2008 “We expect to report on significant progress in our product pipeline in the coming year’: Hedging forward-looking statements in corporate press releases.” Discourse Studies 10 5 635 654 Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. “Genre as social action.” Quarterly journal of speech, 70 (2): 151–167. MillerCarolyn R. 1984 “Genre as social action.” Quarterly journal of speech 70 2 151 167 Search in Google Scholar

Mortensen, Sune S. and Janus Mortensen. 2017. “Epistemic stance in courtroom interaction.” In Pragmatics and Law, edited by Francesca Poggi and Alessandro Capone, 401–437. Cham: Springer International Publishing. MortensenSune S. MortensenJanus 2017 “Epistemic stance in courtroom interaction.” In Pragmatics and Law edited by PoggiFrancesca CaponeAlessandro 401 437 Cham Springer International Publishing Search in Google Scholar

Myers, Greg. 1989. “The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles.” Applied linguistics 10 (1): 1–35. MyersGreg 1989 “The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles.” Applied linguistics 10 1 1 35 Search in Google Scholar

Newberg, Joshua A. 2002. “The narrative construction of antitrust.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 12: 181–216. NewbergJoshua A. 2002 “The narrative construction of antitrust.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 12 181 216 Search in Google Scholar

Olchowy, James R. 2003. “Battling for the Judge's or Jury's Imagination: Evidence, Storytelling, and Effective Trial Advocacy.” Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues 16 (1): 1–22. OlchowyJames R. 2003 “Battling for the Judge's or Jury's Imagination: Evidence, Storytelling, and Effective Trial Advocacy.” Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues 16 1 1 22 Search in Google Scholar

Prasad, Pushkala. 2005. Crafting qualitative research: Working in the post-positivist traditions. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharp. PrasadPushkala 2005 Crafting qualitative research: Working in the post-positivist traditions Armonk, N.Y. M.E. Sharp Search in Google Scholar

Resche, Catherine. 2015. “Hedging in the discourse of central banks.” Studies in Communication Sciences 15 (1): 83–92. RescheCatherine 2015 “Hedging in the discourse of central banks.” Studies in Communication Sciences 15 1 83 92 Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, Bernard and G. Anthony Vignaux. 1993. “Probability—the logic of the law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (4): 457–478. RobertsonBernard VignauxG. Anthony 1993 “Probability—the logic of the law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 4 457 478 Search in Google Scholar

Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1994. “Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 13 (2): 149–170. Salager-MeyerFrançoise 1994 “Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 13 2 149 170 Search in Google Scholar

Sandell, Niklas and Peter Svensson. 2016. “The language of failure: The use of accounts in financial reports.” International Journal of Business Communication 53 (1): 5–26. SandellNiklas SvenssonPeter 2016 “The language of failure: The use of accounts in financial reports.” International Journal of Business Communication 53 1 5 26 Search in Google Scholar

Sandell, Niklas and Peter Svensson. 2017. “Writing write-downs: The rhetoric of goodwill impairment.” Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 14 (1): 81–102. SandellNiklas SvenssonPeter 2017 “Writing write-downs: The rhetoric of goodwill impairment.” Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 14 1 81 102 Search in Google Scholar

Sherwin, Richard K. 1993. “The narrative construction of legal reality.” Vermont Law Review 18: 681–719. SherwinRichard K. 1993 “The narrative construction of legal reality.” Vermont Law Review 18 681 719 Search in Google Scholar

Svensson, Peter. 2019. Diskursanalys [Discourse analysis]. Lund: Studentlitteratur. SvenssonPeter 2019 Diskursanalys [Discourse analysis] Lund Studentlitteratur Search in Google Scholar

Szczyrbak, Magdalena. 2013. “ “I think my own view is that.. .” On the Linguistic Construction of Evidence in Courtroom Discourse.” Topics in Linguistics 12: 65–74. SzczyrbakMagdalena 2013 “ “I think my own view is that.. .” On the Linguistic Construction of Evidence in Courtroom Discourse.” Topics in Linguistics 12 65 74 Search in Google Scholar

Tai, Stephanie. 2008. “Uncertainty about uncertainty: The impact of judicial decisions on assessing scientific uncertainty.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 11 (3): 671–728. TaiStephanie 2008 “Uncertainty about uncertainty: The impact of judicial decisions on assessing scientific uncertainty.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 11 3 671 728 Search in Google Scholar

Taweel, Abeer Q., Emad M. Saidat, Hussein A. Rafayah and Ahmad M. Saidat. 2011. “Hedging in Political Discourse.” Linguistics Journal 5 (1): 169–196. TaweelAbeer Q. SaidatEmad M. RafayahHussein A. SaidatAhmad M. 2011 “Hedging in Political Discourse.” Linguistics Journal 5 1 169 196 Search in Google Scholar

Toska, Bledar. 2012. “Epistemic Hedges and Boosters as Stance Markers in Legal Argumentative Discourse.” Topics in Linguistics 10: 57–62. ToskaBledar 2012 “Epistemic Hedges and Boosters as Stance Markers in Legal Argumentative Discourse.” Topics in Linguistics 10 57 62 Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. Van LeeuwenTheo 2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 1 91 112 Search in Google Scholar

Vass, Holly. 2004. “Socio-cognitive aspects of hedging in two legal discourse genres.” Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE) 7 : 125–141. VassHolly 2004 “Socio-cognitive aspects of hedging in two legal discourse genres.” Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE) 7 125 141 Search in Google Scholar

Vass, Holly. 2017. “Lexical verb hedging in legal discourse: The case of law journal articles and Supreme Court majority and dissenting opinions.” English for Specific Purposes 48: 17–31. VassHolly 2017 “Lexical verb hedging in legal discourse: The case of law journal articles and Supreme Court majority and dissenting opinions.” English for Specific Purposes 48 17 31 Search in Google Scholar

Vold, Eva T. 2006. “Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16 (1): 61–87. VoldEva T. 2006 “Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16 1 61 87 Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Huili, Lixin Li and Jingxiang Cao. 2012. “Lexical features in corporate annual reports: A corpus-based study.” European Journal of Business and Social Sciences 1 (9): 55–71. WangHuili LiLixin CaoJingxiang 2012 “Lexical features in corporate annual reports: A corpus-based study.” European Journal of Business and Social Sciences 1 9 55 71 Search in Google Scholar