How to get to know what we know: Introduction to the special issue, What do we Know about Media, Communication, Journalism, and Democracy in the Nordics?
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Corner, J. (2013). Is there a ‘field’ of media research? – The ‘fragmentation’ issue revisited. Media, Culture & Society, 35(8), 1011–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713508702CornerJ.2013Is there a ‘field’ of media research? – The ‘fragmentation’ issue revisitedMedia, Culture & Society35810111018https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713508702Search in Google Scholar
Couldry, N. (2013). If not a single field, then what? Media, Culture & Society, 35(8), 1023–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713508704CouldryN.2013If not a single field, then what?Media, Culture & Society35810231026https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713508704Search in Google Scholar
Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.xCraigR. T.1999Communication theory as a fieldCommunication Theory92119161https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.xSearch in Google Scholar
Donsbach, W. (2006). The identity of communication research. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00294.xDonsbachW.2006The identity of communication researchJournal of Communication563437448https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00294.xSearch in Google Scholar
George, B., Andersen, L. B., Hall, J. L., & Pandey, S. K. (2023). Writing impactful reviews to rejuvenate public administration: A framework and recommendations. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1517–1527. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13756GeorgeB.AndersenL. B.HallJ. L.PandeyS. K.2023Writing impactful reviews to rejuvenate public administration: A framework and recommendationsPublic Administration Review83615171527https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13756Search in Google Scholar
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.xGrantM. J.BoothA.2009A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologiesHealth Information & Libraries Journal26291108https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 473–496). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9HicksD.2004The four literatures of social scienceInMoedH. F.GlänzelW.SchmochU.(Eds.),Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems473496Springerhttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9Search in Google Scholar
Hong, Q. N., & Pluye, P. (2018). Systematic reviews: A brief historical overview. Education for Information, 34(4), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-180219HongQ. N.PluyeP.2018Systematic reviews: A brief historical overviewEducation for Information344261276https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-180219Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600407JensenL. A.AllenM. N.1996Meta-synthesis of qualitative findingsQualitative Health Research64553560https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600407Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.JohnsonR.WatkinsonA.MabeM.2018The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishingInternational Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical PublishersSearch in Google Scholar
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies (Vol. 11). Sage.NoblitG. W.HareR. D.1988Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies11SageSearch in Google Scholar
Pope, C., Mays, N., & Popay, J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health research. McGraw-Hill Education.PopeC.MaysN.PopayJ.2007Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health researchMcGraw-Hill EducationSearch in Google Scholar
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71SackettD. L.RosenbergW. M. C.GrayJ. A. M.HaynesR. B.RichardsonW. S.1996Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’tBMJ31270237172https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71Search in Google Scholar
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001StarS. L.GriesemerJ. R.1989Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39Social Studies of Science193387420https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001Search in Google Scholar
Tunstall, J. (1983). The trouble with U.S. communication research. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02410.xTunstallJ.1983The trouble with U.S. communication researchJournal of Communication3339295https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02410.xSearch in Google Scholar
Waisbord, S. (2019). Communication: A post-discipline. John Wiley & Sons.WaisbordS.2019Communication: A post-disciplineJohn Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
Wenzel, M., Gylfe, P., Mantere, S., & Cornelissen, J. (2025, May 14). The manifold impacts of management research. Journal of Management Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13240WenzelM.GylfeP.MantereS.CornelissenJ.2025May14The manifold impacts of management researchJournal of Management StudiesAdvance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13240Search in Google Scholar
Young, K., Ashby, D., Boaz, A., & Grayson, L. (2002). Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society, 1(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746402003068YoungK.AshbyD.BoazA.GraysonL.2002Social science and the evidence-based policy movementSocial Policy and Society13215224https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746402003068Search in Google Scholar