This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ackerman, B. A., & Fishkin, J. S. (2004). Deliberation day. Yale University Press.AckermanB. A.FishkinJ. S.2004Yale University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Adjin-Tettey, T. D., & Garman, A. (2023). Lurking as a mode of listening in social media: Motivations-based typologies. Digital Transformation and Society, 2(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTS-07-2022-0028Adjin-TetteyT. D.GarmanA.2023Lurking as a mode of listening in social media: Motivations-based typologies211126https://doi.org/10.1108/DTS-07-2022-0028Search in Google Scholar
Amnå, E., & Ekman, J. (2014). Standby citizens: Diverse faces of political passivity. European Political Science Review, 6(2), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577391300009XAmnåE.EkmanJ.2014Standby citizens: Diverse faces of political passivity62261281https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577391300009XSearch in Google Scholar
Andersen, I. (2022). ‘Well, that’s just my opinion’: The principle of expression and the public debate. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.16997/10.16997/jdd.958AndersenI.2022‘Well, that’s just my opinion’: The principle of expression and the public debate181110https://doi.org/10.16997/10.16997/jdd.958Search in Google Scholar
Barber, B. (2003). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press.BarberB.2003University of California PressSearch in Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. (2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative.BennettW. L.2008MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning InitiativeSearch in Google Scholar
Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318814190BoulianneS.TheocharisY.2020Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research382111127https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318814190Search in Google Scholar
Chambers, S. (2013). The many faces of good citizenship. Critical Review, 25(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2013.843874ChambersS.2013The many faces of good citizenship252199209https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2013.843874Search in Google Scholar
Christiano, T. (2015). Voter ignorance is not necessarily a problem. Critical Review, 27(3–4), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2015.1111669ChristianoT.2015Voter ignorance is not necessarily a problem273–4253269https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2015.1111669Search in Google Scholar
Collins, B., Marichal, J., & Neve, R. (2020). The social media commons: Public sphere, agonism, and algorithmic obligation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1742266CollinsB.MarichalJ.NeveR.2020The social media commons: Public sphere, agonism, and algorithmic obligation174409425https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1742266Search in Google Scholar
Cotter, K., & Thorson, K. (2022). Judging value in a time of information cacophony: Young adults, social media, and the messiness of do-it-yourself expertise. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(3), 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221082CotterK.ThorsonK.2022Judging value in a time of information cacophony: Young adults, social media, and the messiness of do-it-yourself expertise273629647https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221082Search in Google Scholar
Couldry, N., Livingstone, S., & Markham, T. (2007). Media consumption and public engagement: Beyond the presumption of attention. Springer.CouldryN.LivingstoneS.MarkhamT.2007SpringerSearch in Google Scholar
Crawford, K. (2011). Listening, not lurking: The neglected form of participation. In H. Greif, L. Hjorth, A. Lasén, & C. Lobet-Maris (Eds.), Cultures of participation (pp. 63–74). Pter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01238-5CrawfordK.2011Listening, not lurking: The neglected form of participationInGreifH.HjorthL.LasénA.Lobet-MarisC.(Eds.),6374Pter Langhttps://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01238-5Search in Google Scholar
Dennis, J. (2019). Beyond slacktivism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00844-4DennisJ.2019Springerhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00844-4Search in Google Scholar
Dobson, A. (2014). Listening for democracy: Recognition, representation, reconciliation. Oxford University Press.DobsonA.2014Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Edelmann, N. (2015). What is lurking? A literature review of research on lurking. In G. Riva, B. K. Wiederhold, & P. Cipresso (Eds.), The psychology of social networking vol. 1: Personal experience in online communities (pp. 159–174). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473780EdelmannN.2015What is lurking? A literature review of research on lurkingInRivaG.WiederholdB. K.CipressoP.(Eds.),159174De Gruyterhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473780Search in Google Scholar
Ercan, S. A., Hendriks, C. M., & Dryzek, J. S. (2019). Public deliberation in an era of communicative plenty. Policy & Politics, 47(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15200933925405ErcanS. A.HendriksC. M.DryzekJ. S.2019Public deliberation in an era of communicative plenty4711935https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15200933925405Search in Google Scholar
Felicetti, A. (2022). Casting a new light on the democratic spectator. Democratization, 29(7), 1291–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2048818FelicettiA.2022Casting a new light on the democratic spectator29712911309https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2048818Search in Google Scholar
Fern, E. F. (2001). Advanced focus group research. Sage.FernE. F.2001SageSearch in Google Scholar
Gagrčin, E. (2023). ‘Who, if not me?’ How political self-categorizations shape the meaning of political self-expression on social media as a citizenship norm. Information, Communication & Society, 27(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2174792GagrčinE.2023‘Who, if not me?’ How political self-categorizations shape the meaning of political self-expression on social media as a citizenship norm271109125https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2174792Search in Google Scholar
Gagrčin, E., Porten-Cheé, P., Leißner, L., Emmer, M., & Jørring, L. (2022). What makes a good citizen online? The emergence of discursive citizenship norms in social media environments. Social Media + Society, 8(1), 20563051221084297. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221084297GagrčinE.Porten-CheéP.LeißnerL.EmmerM.JørringL.2022What makes a good citizen online? The emergence of discursive citizenship norms in social media environments8120563051221084297. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221084297Search in Google Scholar
Geiß, S., Magin, M., Jürgens, P., & Stark, B. (2021). Loopholes in the echo chambers: How the echo chamber metaphor oversimplifies the effects of information gateways on opinion expression. Digital Journalism, 9(5), 660–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1873811GeißS.MaginM.JürgensP.StarkB.2021Loopholes in the echo chambers: How the echo chamber metaphor oversimplifies the effects of information gateways on opinion expression95660686https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1873811Search in Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (2003). Reflective democracy. Oxford University Press.GoodinR. E.2003Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Gran, A., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2021). To be or not to be algorithm aware: A question of a new digital divide? Information, Communication & Society, 24(12), 1779–1796. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1736124GranA.BoothP.BucherT.2021To be or not to be algorithm aware: A question of a new digital divide?241217791796https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1736124Search in Google Scholar
Green, J. E. (2010). The eyes of the people: Democracy in an age of spectatorship. Oxford University Press.GreenJ. E.2010Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Greene, A. K., Maloul, E., Kelly, D. A., Norling, H. N., & Brownstone, L. M. (2022). “An immaculate keeper of my social media feed”: Social media usage in body justice communities during the Covid-19 pandemic. Social Media + Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077024GreeneA. K.MaloulE.KellyD. A.NorlingH. N.BrownstoneL. M.2022“An immaculate keeper of my social media feed”: Social media usage in body justice communities during the Covid-19 pandemic81https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077024Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.xHabermasJ.2006Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research164411426https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243HardinG.1968The tragedy of the commons162385912431248https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243Search in Google Scholar
Holst, C., & Moe, H. (2021). Deliberative systems theory and citizens’ use of online media: Testing a critical theory of democracy on a high achiever. Political Studies, 69(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890809HolstC.MoeH.2021Deliberative systems theory and citizens’ use of online media: Testing a critical theory of democracy on a high achiever691129146https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890809Search in Google Scholar
Hong, Y., Hu, J., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Would you go invisible on social media? An empirical study on the antecedents of users’ lurking behavior. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122237HongY.HuJ.ZhaoY.2023Would you go invisible on social media? An empirical study on the antecedents of users’ lurking behavior187122237https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122237Search in Google Scholar
James, C., & Lee, A. (2017). Speaking up online: Civic identity and expression in the digital age. In J. Earl, & D. A. Rohlinger (Eds.), Social movements and media (pp. 119–146). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020170000014003JamesC.LeeA.2017Speaking up online: Civic identity and expression in the digital ageInEarlJ.RohlingerD. A.(Eds.),119146Emeraldhttps://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020170000014003Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, J. L., & Schwartz, S. A. (2021). The return of the “lurker”: A longitudinal study of citizens’ use of social media in Danish elections 2011, 2015, and 2019. Social Media + Society, 7(4), 20563051211063463. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211063463JensenJ. L.SchwartzS. A.2021The return of the “lurker”: A longitudinal study of citizens’ use of social media in Danish elections 2011, 2015, and 20197420563051211063463. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211063463Search in Google Scholar
Kim, B., & Hoewe, J. (2023). Developing contemporary factors of political participation. The Social Science Journal, 60(4), 862–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1782641KimB.HoeweJ.2023Developing contemporary factors of political participation604862876https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1782641Search in Google Scholar
Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2017). Alternative citizenship models: Contextualizing new media and the new “good citizen”. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1887–1903. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817713742Kligler-VilenchikN.2017Alternative citizenship models: Contextualizing new media and the new “good citizen”191118871903https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817713742Search in Google Scholar
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A.2014SageSearch in Google Scholar
Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. The Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143KruseL. M.NorrisD. R.FlinchumJ. R.2018Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media5916284https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143Search in Google Scholar
Kushner, S. (2016). Read only: The persistence of lurking in Web 2.0. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i6.6789KushnerS.2016Read only: The persistence of lurking in Web 2.0https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i6.6789Search in Google Scholar
Lacey, K. (2013). Listening publics: The politics and experience of listening in the media age. John Wiley & Sons.LaceyK.2013John Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
Lane, D. S. (2020). In search of the expressive citizen: Citizenship norms and youth political expression on social media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa018LaneD. S.2020In search of the expressive citizen: Citizenship norms and youth political expression on social media84S1257283https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa018Search in Google Scholar
Lieberkind, J., & Bruun, J. (2021). The reserved young citizens of the Nordic countries. Northern Lights on Civic and Citizenship Education: A Cross-National Comparison of Nordic Data from ICCS, 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66788-7_2LieberkindJ.BruunJ.2021The reserved young citizens of the Nordic countries1941https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66788-7_2Search in Google Scholar
Livingstone, S. (2015). Active audiences? The debate progresses but is far from resolved. Communication Theory, 25(4), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12078LivingstoneS.2015Active audiences? The debate progresses but is far from resolved254439446https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12078Search in Google Scholar
Manning, N. (2013). ‘I mainly look at things on an issue by issue basis’: Reflexivity and phronêsis in young people’s political engagements. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.693586ManningN.2013‘I mainly look at things on an issue by issue basis’: Reflexivity and phronêsis in young people’s political engagements1611733https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.693586Search in Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2015). A minimalist definition of deliberation. In P. Heller, & V. Rao (Eds.), Deliberation and development: Rethinking the role of voice and collective action in unequal societies (pp. 27–50). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0501-1_ch2MansbridgeJ.2015A minimalist definition of deliberationInHellerP.RaoV.(Eds.),2750World Bankhttps://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0501-1_ch2Search in Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F., & Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson, & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale, (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178914.002MansbridgeJ.BohmanJ.ChambersS.ChristianoT.FungA.ParkinsonJ.ThompsonD. F.WarrenM. E.2012A systemic approach to deliberative democracyInParkinsonJ.MansbridgeJ.(Eds.),126Cambridge University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178914.002Search in Google Scholar
Mathieu, D., & Pavlíčková, T. (2017). Cross-media within the Facebook newsfeed: The role of the reader in cross-media uses. Convergence, 23(4), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517700383MathieuD.PavlíčkováT.2017Cross-media within the Facebook newsfeed: The role of the reader in cross-media uses234425438https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517700383Search in Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Lurk. In Merriam-webster.com dictionary. Retrieved March 12, 2024, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lurkMerriam-Webster(n.d.).LurkInRetrieved March 12, 2024, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lurkSearch in Google Scholar
Moe, H. (2020). Distributed readiness citizenship: A realistic, normative concept for citizens’ public connection. Communication Theory, 30(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/ct/qtz016MoeH.2020Distributed readiness citizenship: A realistic, normative concept for citizens’ public connection302205225https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/ct/qtz016Search in Google Scholar
Moe, H. (2023). Operationalizing distribution as a key concept for public sphere theory: A call for ethnographic sensibility of different social worlds. Communication Theory, 33(2–3), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad008MoeH.2023Operationalizing distribution as a key concept for public sphere theory: A call for ethnographic sensibility of different social worlds332–3112121https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad008Search in Google Scholar
Moe, H., Hovden, J. F., Ytre-Arne, B., Figenschou, T., Nærland, T. U., Sakariassen, H., & Thorbjørnsrud, K. (2019). Informerte borgere? Offentlig tilknytning, mediebruk og demokrati [Informed citizens? Public connection, media use, and democracy]. Universitetsforlaget.MoeH.HovdenJ. F.Ytre-ArneB.FigenschouT.NærlandT. U.SakariassenH.ThorbjørnsrudK.2019UniversitetsforlagetSearch in Google Scholar
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters Institute digital news report 2023. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023NewmanN.FletcherR.EddyK.RobertsonC. T.NielsenR. K.2023Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxfordhttps://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023Search in Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. (2006). The 90-9-1 rule for participation inequality in social media and online communities. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/NielsenJ.2006Nielsen Norman Grouphttps://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/Search in Google Scholar
Nieminen, H. (2014). A short history of the epistemic commons: Critical intellectuals, Europe and the small nations. Javnost – The Public, 21(3), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2014.11073413NieminenH.2014A short history of the epistemic commons: Critical intellectuals, Europe and the small nations2135576https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2014.11073413Search in Google Scholar
Norris, P. (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford University Press.NorrisP.1999Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Ohme, J. (2019). Updating citizenship? The effects of digital media use on citizenship understanding and political participation. Information, Communication & Society, 22(13), 1903–1928. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1469657OhmeJ.2019Updating citizenship? The effects of digital media use on citizenship understanding and political participation221319031928https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1469657Search in Google Scholar
Oser, J., Hooghe, M., Bakk, Z., & Di Mari, R. (2023). Changing citizenship norms among adolescents, 1999–2009–2016: A two-step latent class approach with measurement equivalence testing. Quality & Quantity, 57(5), 4915–4933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01585-5OserJ.HoogheM.BakkZ.Di MariR.2023Changing citizenship norms among adolescents, 1999–2009–2016: A two-step latent class approach with measurement equivalence testing57549154933https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01585-5Search in Google Scholar
Pugh, A. J. (2013). What good are interviews for thinking about culture? Demystifying interpretive analysis. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 1, 42–68. https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2012.4PughA. J.2013What good are interviews for thinking about culture? Demystifying interpretive analysis14268https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2012.4Search in Google Scholar
Quandt, T. (2018). Dark participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519QuandtT.2018Dark participation643648https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519Search in Google Scholar
Ruess, C., Hoffmann, C. P., Boulianne, S., & Heger, K. (2023). Online political participation: The evolution of a concept. Information, Communication & Society, 26(8), 1495–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2013919RuessC.HoffmannC. P.BoulianneS.HegerK.2023Online political participation: The evolution of a concept26814951512https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2013919Search in Google Scholar
Sakariassen, H., & Meijer, I. C. (2021). Why so quiet? Exploring inhibition in digital public spaces. European Journal of Communication, 36(5), 494–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211017346SakariassenH.MeijerI. C.2021Why so quiet? Exploring inhibition in digital public spaces365494510https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211017346Search in Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.SaldañaJ.2021SageSearch in Google Scholar
Schrøder, K. C. (2017). Towards the “audiencization” of mediatization research? Audience dynamics as co-constitutive of mediatization processes. In O. Driessens, G. Bolin, A. Hepp, & S. Hjarvard (Eds.), Dynamics of mediatization: Institutional change and everyday transformations in a digital age (pp. 85–115). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62983-4_5SchrøderK. C.2017Towards the “audiencization” of mediatization research? Audience dynamics as co-constitutive of mediatization processesInDriessensO.BolinG.HeppA.HjarvardS.(Eds.),85115Palgrave Macmillanhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62983-4_5Search in Google Scholar
Schrøder, K. C. (2018). Audience reception. In P. M. Napoli (Ed.), Mediated communication (pp. 105–128). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110481129SchrøderK. C.2018Audience receptionInNapoliP. M.(Ed.),105128De Gruyterhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110481129Search in Google Scholar
Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. Free Press.SchudsonM.1998Free PressSearch in Google Scholar
Solverson, E. (2023). Assessing worthwhileness of political contributions on social media: A study of young adults in Norway. Mediální studia, 17(2), 184–208.SolversonE.2023Assessing worthwhileness of political contributions on social media: A study of young adults in Norway172184208Search in Google Scholar
Statistics Norway. (2023). Ni av ti nordmenn bruker sosiale medier [Nine out of ten Norwegians use social media]. https://www.ssb.no/teknologi-og-innovasjon/informasjons-og-kommunikasjonsteknologi-ikt/statistikk/bruk-av-ikt-i-husholdningene/artikler/ni-av-ti-nordmenn-bruker-sosiale-medierStatistics Norway2023https://www.ssb.no/teknologi-og-innovasjon/informasjons-og-kommunikasjonsteknologi-ikt/statistikk/bruk-av-ikt-i-husholdningene/artikler/ni-av-ti-nordmenn-bruker-sosiale-medierSearch in Google Scholar
Sveningsson, M. (2014). I don’t like it and I think it’s useless, people discussing politics on Facebook”: Young Swedes’ understandings of social media use for political discussion. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(3), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-3-8SveningssonM.2014I don’t like it and I think it’s useless, people discussing politics on Facebook”: Young Swedes’ understandings of social media use for political discussion83106120https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-3-8Search in Google Scholar
Sveningsson, M. (2015). “It’s only a pastime, really”: Young people’s experiences of social media as a source of news about public affairs. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 2056305115604855. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604855SveningssonM.2015“It’s only a pastime, really”: Young people’s experiences of social media as a source of news about public affairs122056305115604855. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604855Search in Google Scholar
Theocharis, Y., de Moor, J., & Van Deth, J. W. (2021). Digitally networked participation and lifestyle politics as new modes of political participation. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.231TheocharisY.de MoorJ.Van DethJ. W.2021Digitally networked participation and lifestyle politics as new modes of political participation1313053https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.231Search in Google Scholar
Theocharis, Y., & van Deth, J. W. (2017). Political participation in a changing world: Conceptual and empirical challenges in the study of citizen engagement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203728673TheocharisY.van DethJ. W.2017Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203728673Search in Google Scholar
Thorson, K. (2015). Sampling from the civic buffet: Youth, new media, and do-it-yourself citizenship. In H. G. de Zuniga Navajas (Ed.), New technologies and civic engagement: New agendas in communication (pp. 3–22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750927ThorsonK.2015Sampling from the civic buffet: Youth, new media, and do-it-yourself citizenshipInde Zuniga NavajasH. G.(Ed.),322Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750927Search in Google Scholar
Thorson, K., Vraga, E. K., & Klinger-Vilenchik, N. (2014). Don’t push your opinions on me: Young citizens and political etiquette on Facebook. In J. A. Hendricks, & D. Schill (Eds.), Presidential campaigning and social media: An analysis of the 2012 campaign (pp. 74–93). Oxford University Press.ThorsonK.VragaE. K.Klinger-VilenchikN.2014Don’t push your opinions on me: Young citizens and political etiquette on FacebookInHendricksJ. A.SchillD.(Eds.),7493Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087ThorsonK.WellsC.2016Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age263309328https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087Search in Google Scholar
van Deth, J. W. (2014). A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica, 49, 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.6van DethJ. W.2014A conceptual map of political participation49349367https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.6Search in Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211136ZallerJ.2003A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen202109130https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211136Search in Google Scholar