This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ala-Fossi, M. (2020). Finland: Media welfare state in the digital era? Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 11(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00020_1Ala-FossiM.2020Finland: Media welfare state in the digital era?Journal of Digital Media & Policy112133150https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00020_1Search in Google Scholar
Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1493–1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20857Barzilai-NahonK.2008Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information controlJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology5914931512https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20857Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.xBennettW. L.1990Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United StatesJournal of Communication402103127https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.xSearch in Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. (2014). Press–government relations in a changing media environment. In K. Kenski, & K. Hall Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 249–262). Oxford Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.40BennettW. L.2014Press–government relations in a changing media environmentInKenskiK.Hall JamiesonK.(Eds.),The Oxford handbook of political communication249262Oxford Handbookshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.40Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. (2016). News: The politics of illusion (10th ed.). The University of Chicago Press.BennettW. L.2016News: The politics of illusion10th ed.The University of Chicago PressSearch in Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017BennettW. L.PfetschB.2018Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheresJournal of Communication682243253https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017Search in Google Scholar
Berkowitz, D. (1987). TV news sources and news channels: A study in agenda-building. Journalism Quarterly, 64(2–3), 508–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908706400231BerkowitzD.1987TV news sources and news channels: A study in agenda-buildingJournalism Quarterly642–3508513https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908706400231Search in Google Scholar
Brown, J. D., Bybee, C. R., Wearden, S. T., & Straughn, D. M. (1987). Invisible power: Newspaper news sources and the limits of diversity. Journalism Quarterly, 64(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908706400106BrownJ. D.BybeeC. R.WeardenS. T.StraughnD. M.1987Invisible power: Newspaper news sources and the limits of diversityJournalism Quarterly6414554https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908706400106Search in Google Scholar
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.ChadwickA.2013The hybrid media system: Politics and powerOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Cook, T. E. (1998). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. University of Chicago Press.CookT. E.1998Governing with the news: The news media as a political institutionUniversity of Chicago PressSearch in Google Scholar
DeIuliis, D. (2015). Gatekeeping theory from social fields to social networks. Communication Research Trends, 34(1), 1–23. http://cscc.scu.edu/trends/v34/CRT_v34_n1_March2015.pdfDeIuliisD.2015Gatekeeping theory from social fields to social networksCommunication Research Trends341123http://cscc.scu.edu/trends/v34/CRT_v34_n1_March2015.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Dunwoody, S. (1999). Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 59–79). Lawrence Erlbaum.DunwoodyS.1999Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertaintyInFriedmanS. M.DunwoodyS.RogersC. L.(Eds.).Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science5979Lawrence ErlbaumSearch in Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450–2468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170FletcherR.NielsenR. K.2018Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysisNew Media & Society20724502468https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170Search in Google Scholar
Gandy, O. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Bloomsbury Academic.GandyO.1982Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policyBloomsbury AcademicSearch in Google Scholar
Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Times. Vintage Books.GansH. J.1979Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and TimesVintage BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D. (1993). The impact of quotation in news reports on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70(4), 793–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000405GibsonR.ZillmannD.1993The impact of quotation in news reports on issue perceptionJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly704793800https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000405Search in Google Scholar
Goel, S., Anderson, A., Hofman, J., & Watts, D. J. (2016). The structural virality of online diffusion. Management Science, 62(1), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2158GoelS.AndersonA.HofmanJ.WattsD. J.2016The structural virality of online diffusionManagement Science621180196https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2158Search in Google Scholar
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867HallinD. C.ManciniP.2004Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politicsCambridge University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867Search in Google Scholar
Herkman, J. (2009). The structural transformation of the democratic corporatist model: The Case of Finland. Javnost – The Public, 16(4), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2009.11009015HerkmanJ.2009The structural transformation of the democratic corporatist model: The Case of FinlandJavnost – The Public1647390https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2009.11009015Search in Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879HodgsonG. M.2006What are institutions?Journal of Economic Issues401125https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879Search in Google Scholar
Janicki, M., Kanner, A., & Mäkelä, E. (2023). Detection and attribution of quotes in Finnish news media: BERT vs. rule-based approach. In Proceedings of the 24th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics (NoDaLiDa) (pp. 52–59). NEALT Proceedings Series. University of Tartu Library.JanickiM.KannerA.MäkeläE.2023Detection and attribution of quotes in Finnish news media: BERT vs. rule-based approachInProceedings of the 24th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics (NoDaLiDa)5259NEALT Proceedings Series.University of Tartu LibrarySearch in Google Scholar
Johnston, J., & Forde, S. (2017). Churnalism. Digital Journalism, 5(8), 943–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1355026JohnstonJ.FordeS.2017ChurnalismDigital Journalism58943946https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1355026Search in Google Scholar
Kantola, A. (2013). From gardeners to revolutionaries: The rise of the liquid ethos in political journalism. Journalism, 14(5), 606–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912454504KantolaA.2013From gardeners to revolutionaries: The rise of the liquid ethos in political journalismJournalism145606626https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912454504Search in Google Scholar
Karlsson, M., Van Couvering, E., & Lindell, J. (2022). Publishing, sharing, and spreading online news: A case study of gatekeeping logics in the platform era. Nordicom Review, 43(2), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0012KarlssonM.Van CouveringE.LindellJ.2022Publishing, sharing, and spreading online news: A case study of gatekeeping logics in the platform eraNordicom Review432190213https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0012Search in Google Scholar
Koivunen, A., Kanner, A., Janicki, M., Harju, A., Hokkanen, J., & Mäkelä, E. (2021). Emotive, evaluative, epistemic: A linguistic analysis of affectivity in news journalism. Journalism, 22(5), 1190–1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985724KoivunenA.KannerA.JanickiM.HarjuA.HokkanenJ.MäkeläE.2021Emotive, evaluative, epistemic: A linguistic analysis of affectivity in news journalismJournalism22511901206https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985724Search in Google Scholar
Koivunen, A., & Vuorelma, J. (2022). Trust and authority in the age of mediatised politics. European Journal of Communication, 37(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072653KoivunenA.VuorelmaJ.2022Trust and authority in the age of mediatised politicsEuropean Journal of Communication374393408https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072653Search in Google Scholar
Koljonen, K. (2013). The shift from high to liquid ideals: Making sense of journalism and its change through a multidimensional model. Nordicom Review, 34(S1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2013-0110KoljonenK.2013The shift from high to liquid ideals: Making sense of journalism and its change through a multidimensional modelNordicom Review34S1141154https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2013-0110Search in Google Scholar
Kunelius, R., & Reunanen, E. (2012). Media in political power: A parsonian view on the differentiated mediatization of Finnish decision makers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211424207KuneliusR.ReunanenE.2012Media in political power: A parsonian view on the differentiated mediatization of Finnish decision makersThe International Journal of Press/Politics1715675https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211424207Search in Google Scholar
Lecheler, S., & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society, 18(1), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412LechelerS.KruikemeierS.2016Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sourcesNew Media & Society181156171https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412Search in Google Scholar
Lehdonvirta, V. (2022). Cloud empires: How digital platforms are overtaking the state and how we can regain control. MIT Press.LehdonvirtaV.2022Cloud empires: How digital platforms are overtaking the state and how we can regain controlMIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
Maurer, P., & Beiler, M. (2018). Networking and political alignment as strategies to control the news. Journalism Studies, 19(14), 2024–2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1310627MaurerP.BeilerM.2018Networking and political alignment as strategies to control the newsJournalism Studies191420242041https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1310627Search in Google Scholar
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2022). Reuters Institute digital news report 2022. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2022NewmanN.FletcherR.RobertsonC. T.EddyK.Kleis NielsenR.2022Reuters Institute digital news report 2022Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. University of Oxfordhttps://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2022Search in Google Scholar
Parmelee, J. H. (2014). The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media & Society, 16(3), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487955ParmeleeJ. H.2014The agenda-building function of political tweetsNew Media & Society163434450https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487955Search in Google Scholar
Reese, S. D. (2021). The crisis of the institutional press. Polity.ReeseS. D.2021The crisis of the institutional pressPolitySearch in Google Scholar
Reich, Z. (2006). The process model of news initiative: Sources lead first, reporters thereafter. Journalism Studies, 7(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600757928ReichZ.2006The process model of news initiative: Sources lead first, reporters thereafterJournalism Studies74497514https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600757928Search in Google Scholar
Reunanen, E., Kunelius, R., & Noppari, E. (2010). Mediatization in context: Consensus culture, media and decision making in the 21st century, the case of Finland. Communications, 35(3), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.016ReunanenE.KuneliusR.NoppariE.2010Mediatization in context: Consensus culture, media and decision making in the 21st century, the case of FinlandCommunications353287307https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.016Search in Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (2006). Who gets to speak? A study of sources in the broadsheet press. In E. Poole, & J. Richardson (Eds.). Muslims and the news media (pp. 103–115). I. B. Tauris.RichardsonJ.2006Who gets to speak? A study of sources in the broadsheet pressInPooleE.RichardsonJ.(Eds.).Muslims and the news media103115I. B. TaurisSearch in Google Scholar
Rosen, J. (2012). The people formerly known as the audience. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 13–16). NYU Press.RosenJ.2012The people formerly known as the audienceInMandibergM.(Ed.),The social media reader1316NYU PressSearch in Google Scholar
Schudson, M. (2003). The sociology of news. W. W. Norton.SchudsonM.2003The sociology of newsW. W. NortonSearch in Google Scholar
Seuri, O., Era, R., Koivunen, A., Janicki, M., Toivanen, P., Hokkanen, J., & Mäkelä, E. (2021). Uutisvuon hallitsija: Uutismedia kiky-kamppailussa 2015–2016 [Ruler of the news flow: Traditional media in the competitiveness pact negotiations 2015–2016]. Politiikka, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.37452/politiikka.99432SeuriO.EraR.KoivunenA.JanickiM.ToivanenP.HokkanenJ.MäkeläE.2021Uutisvuon hallitsija: Uutismedia kiky-kamppailussa 2015–2016 [Ruler of the news flow: Traditional media in the competitiveness pact negotiations 2015–2016]Politiikka633https://doi.org/10.37452/politiikka.99432Search in Google Scholar
Seuri, O., & Ikäheimo, H.-P. (2022, November 25). Gatekeeping in the digital age [Sitra Working Paper]. Sitra.SeuriO.IkäheimoH.-P.2022November25Gatekeeping in the digital age [Sitra Working Paper]SitraSearch in Google Scholar
Shoemaker, P., & Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653ShoemakerP.VosT. P.2009Gatekeeping theoryRoutledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653Search in Google Scholar
Sigal, L. V. (1973). Reporters & officials: The organisation & politics of newsmaking. D. C. Heath.SigalL. V.1973Reporters & officials: The organisation & politics of newsmakingD. C. HeathSearch in Google Scholar
Skogerbø, E., Bruns, A., Quodling, A., & Ingebretsen, T. (2016). Agenda-setting revisited: Social media in mainstream journalism. In G. Enli, A. Bruns, A. O. Larsson, E. Skogerbo, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 104–120). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299SkogerbøE.BrunsA.QuodlingA.IngebretsenT.2016Agenda-setting revisited: Social media in mainstream journalismInEnliG.BrunsA.LarssonA. O.SkogerboE.ChristensenC.(Eds.),The Routledge companion to social media and politics104120Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299Search in Google Scholar
Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02872.xSundarS. S.NassC.2001Conceptualizing sources in online newsJournal of Communication515272https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02872.xSearch in Google Scholar
Syvertsen, T., Gunn, E., Mjøs, O., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001SyvertsenT.GunnE.MjøsO.MoeH.2014The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital eraThe University of Michigan Presshttps://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001Search in Google Scholar
Thorsen, E., & Jackson, D. (2018). Seven characteristics defining online news formats. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 847–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1468722ThorsenE.JacksonD.2018Seven characteristics defining online news formatsDigital Journalism67847868https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1468722Search in Google Scholar
Thorson K., & Wells, C. (2015). How gatekeeping still matters: Understanding media effects in an era of curated flows. In T. P. Vos, & F. Heinderyckx (Eds.), Gatekeeping in Transition (pp. 25–44). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315849652ThorsonK.WellsC.2015How gatekeeping still matters: Understanding media effects in an era of curated flowsInVosT. P.HeinderyckxF.(Eds.),Gatekeeping in Transition2544Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315849652Search in Google Scholar
Tiffen, R., Jones, P. K., Rowe, D., Aalberg, T., Coen, S., Curran, J., Hayashi, K., Iyengar, S., Mazzoleni, G., Papathanassopoulos, S., Rojas, H., & Soroka, S. (2014). Sources in the news: A comparative study. Journalism studies, 15(4), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.831239TiffenR.JonesP. K.RoweD.AalbergT.CoenS.CurranJ.HayashiK.IyengarS.MazzoleniG.PapathanassopoulosS.RojasH.SorokaS.2014Sources in the news: A comparative studyJournalism studies154374391https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.831239Search in Google Scholar
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. The Free Press.TuchmanG.1978Making news: A study in the construction of realityThe Free PressSearch in Google Scholar
Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017) Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551Van AelstP.StrömbäckJ.AalbergT.EsserF.de VreeseC.MatthesJ.HopmannD.SalgadoS.HubéN.StępińskaA.PapathanassopoulosS.BerganzaR.LegnanteG.ReinemannC.SheaferT.StanyerJ.2017Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association411327https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551Search in Google Scholar
Van Leuven, S., Kruikemeier, S., Lecheler, S., & Hermans, L. (2018). Online and newsworthy. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 798–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1498747Van LeuvenS.KruikemeierS.LechelerS.HermansL.2018Online and newsworthyDigital Journalism67798806https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1498747Search in Google Scholar
Vesa, J., & Kantola, A. (2016). Kuka pääsee mukaan? Miten järjestöjen ääni kuuluu lakien valmistelussa [Who can join? How the voice of organisations is heard in the preparation of laws]. Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja 59/2016 [Government investigation and research publication series 59/2016.]. Prime Minister’s Office Finland.VesaJ.KantolaA.2016Kuka pääsee mukaan? Miten järjestöjen ääni kuuluu lakien valmistelussa [Who can join? How the voice of organisations is heard in the preparation of laws]. Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja 59/2016 [Government investigation and research publication series 59/2016.]Prime Minister’s Office FinlandSearch in Google Scholar
Vesa, J., Kantola, A., & Binderkrantz, A. (2018). A stronghold of routine corporatism? The involvement of interest groups in policy making in Finland. Scandinavian Political Studies, 41(4), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12128VesaJ.KantolaA.BinderkrantzA.2018A stronghold of routine corporatism? The involvement of interest groups in policy making in FinlandScandinavian Political Studies414239262https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12128Search in Google Scholar
Vliegenthart, R., & Boukes, M. (2018) On the street and/or on Twitter? Digital Journalism, 6(7), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1497449VliegenthartR.BoukesM.2018On the street and/or on Twitter?Digital Journalism67829846https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1497449Search in Google Scholar
Vos, T. P. (2015). Revisiting gatekeeping theory during a time of transition. In T. P. Vos, & F. Heinderyckx (Eds.), Gatekeeping in transition (pp. 3–25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315849652VosT. P.2015Revisiting gatekeeping theory during a time of transitionInVosT. P.HeinderyckxF.(Eds.),Gatekeeping in transition325Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315849652Search in Google Scholar
Väliverronen, J. (2022a). Boundaries in motion? Finnish political journalists’ external and internal boundary work in a time of change. Journalism Studies, 23(9), 1037–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2065340VäliverronenJ.2022aBoundaries in motion? Finnish political journalists’ external and internal boundary work in a time of changeJournalism Studies23910371055https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2065340Search in Google Scholar
Väliverronen, J. (2022b). Political journalism content in a new era: The case of Finnish newspapers, 1995–2015. European Journal of Communication, 37(4), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072662VäliverronenJ.2022bPolitical journalism content in a new era: The case of Finnish newspapers, 1995–2015European Journal of Communication374373392https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072662Search in Google Scholar
Wallace, J. (2018). Modelling contemporary gatekeeping. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 274–293, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648WallaceJ.2018Modelling contemporary gatekeepingDigital Journalism63274293https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648Search in Google Scholar
Weaver, D., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Who sets the agenda for the media? A study of local agenda-building. Journalism Quarterly, 62(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908506200113WeaverD.ElliottS. N.1985Who sets the agenda for the media? A study of local agenda-buildingJournalism Quarterly6218794https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908506200113Search in Google Scholar
White, D. M. (1950). The “gate keeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27(4), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905002700403WhiteD. M.1950The “gate keeper”: A case study in the selection of newsJournalism Quarterly274383390https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905002700403Search in Google Scholar
Wihbey, J. P. (2019). The social fact: News and knowledge in a networked world. MIT Press.WihbeyJ. P.2019The social fact: News and knowledge in a networked worldMIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
Williams, B. A., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2004). Monica and Bill all the time and everywhere: The collapse of gatekeeping and agenda setting in the new media environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(9), 1208–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642032623WilliamsB. A.Delli CarpiniM. X.2004Monica and Bill all the time and everywhere: The collapse of gatekeeping and agenda setting in the new media environmentAmerican Behavioral Scientist47912081230https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642032623Search in Google Scholar