Accès libre

Investigations of a journalistic blind spot

Tine Ustad Figenschou

Tine Ustad Figenschou

Department of Journalism and Media Studies, Oslo Metropolitan UniversityNorway
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Figenschou, Tine Ustad
, 
Elisabeth Eide

Elisabeth Eide

Department of Journalism and Media Studies, Oslo Metropolitan UniversityNorway
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Eide, Elisabeth
 et 
Ruth Einervoll Nilsen

Ruth Einervoll Nilsen

Department of Journalism and Media Studies, Oslo Metropolitan UniversityNorway
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Einervoll Nilsen, Ruth
  
07 avr. 2021
Investigations of a journalistic blind spot's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Publié en ligne: 07 avr. 2021
Pages: 71 - 87
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0027
Mots clés
© 2021 Tine Ustad Figenschou et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Figure 1

News salience for care and construction sectors, 1996/1997–2016/2017 (number of stories)Comments: N = 834 (412 from the construction sector and 422 from the care sector). Five national newspapers and two union press magazines were included in the sample. The examined content was published during a constructed six-month period (content published during the third quarter of 1996 and content published during the first quarter of 1997 form the sample for 1996/1997; the merging logic is the same for 2006/2007 and 2016/2017).
News salience for care and construction sectors, 1996/1997–2016/2017 (number of stories)Comments: N = 834 (412 from the construction sector and 422 from the care sector). Five national newspapers and two union press magazines were included in the sample. The examined content was published during a constructed six-month period (content published during the third quarter of 1996 and content published during the first quarter of 1997 form the sample for 1996/1997; the merging logic is the same for 2006/2007 and 2016/2017).

Figure 2

Main topics in mainstream newspapers and trade union magazines, 1996/1997–2016/2017 (per cent)Comments: N = 590 (newspapers) and 244 (trade union magazines). “Other” comprises topics that are rarely covered (like contribution to society, technology, workplace equality, workplace accidents, etc.) and articles that address topics not covered in the analysis.
Main topics in mainstream newspapers and trade union magazines, 1996/1997–2016/2017 (per cent)Comments: N = 590 (newspapers) and 244 (trade union magazines). “Other” comprises topics that are rarely covered (like contribution to society, technology, workplace equality, workplace accidents, etc.) and articles that address topics not covered in the analysis.

Figure 3

Sources quoted in mainstream newspapers and trade union magazines (per cent)Comments: Percentage of total number of news sources (people quoted in the articles). N = 1,389.
Sources quoted in mainstream newspapers and trade union magazines (per cent)Comments: Percentage of total number of news sources (people quoted in the articles). N = 1,389.

Figure 4

Gender distribution of quoted sources across source categories (per cent)Comments: N = 1,377 (in 12 cases, the gender of a news source could not be determined).
Gender distribution of quoted sources across source categories (per cent)Comments: N = 1,377 (in 12 cases, the gender of a news source could not be determined).
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
2 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Sciences sociales, Sciences de la communication, Communication publique et politique, Communication de masse
RSS Feed de la revue