Accès libre

Superficial, shallow and reactive: How a small state news media covers politics

À propos de cet article

Citez

Perceptions concerning the superficiality of political coverage

% 95% CI
Strongly agree 13 (11.1–14.9)
Somewhat agree 40 (37.2–42.8)
Neither agree nor disagree 33 (30.3–35.7)
Somewhat disagree 13 (11.1–14.9)
Strongly disagree 2 (1.3–2.7)

Perceptions concerning critical questions in political coverage

% 95% CI
Strongly agree 2 (1.3–2.7)
Somewhat agree 21 (18.7–23.3)
Neither agree nor disagree 29 (26.4–31.6)
Somewhat disagree 34 (31.3–36.7)
Strongly disagree 14 (12.0–16.0)

Perceptions concerning accuracy in political parliamentary reporting

% 95% CI
Strongly agree 1 (1.3–2.7)
Somewhat agree 20 (21.6–26.4)
Neither agree nor disagree 40 (37.2–42.8)
Somewhat disagree 28 (26.4–30.6)
Strongly disagree 11 (5.6–8.4)

Perceptions concerning the media's financial resources

% 95% CI
Strongly agree 3 (2.1–3.9)
Somewhat agree 17 (14.9–19.1)
Neither agree nor disagree 44 (41.2–46.8)
Somewhat disagree 28 (25.5–30.5)
Strongly disagree 9 (7.4–10.6)

Perceptions concerning the reliability of information on politicians’ work

% 95% CI
Strongly agree 2 (1.3–2.7)
Somewhat agree 24 (21.6–26.4)
Neither agree nor disagree 40 (37.2–42.8)
Somewhat disagree 28 (26.4–30.6)
Strongly disagree 7 (5.6–8.4)

Perceptions concerning investigative work in political coverage

% 95% CI
Strongly agree 2 (1.3–2.7)
Somewhat agree 15 (13.0–17.0)
Neither agree nor disagree 36 (33.3–38.7.)
Somewhat disagree 37 (34.3–39.7)
Strongly disagree 11 (9.2–12.8)
eISSN:
2001-5119
Langue:
Anglais