Accès libre

Issue Salience on Twitter During Swedish Party Leaders’ Debates

Linn A.C. Sandberg
Linn A.C. Sandberg
, 
Ulf Bjereld
Ulf Bjereld
, 
Karina Bunyik
Karina Bunyik
, 
Markus Forsberg
Markus Forsberg
 et 
Richard Johansson
Richard Johansson
   | 11 oct. 2019
Nordicom Review's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Publié en ligne: 11 oct. 2019
Pages: 49 - 61
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0033
Mots clés
© 2019 Sandberg, L.A.C., Bjereld, U., Bunyik, K., Forsberg, M. & Johansson, R., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Figure 1

Total amount of tweets sent during the time of the debateComments: The figure shows all the tweets in our dataset sent between two hours before the debate and one hour after. The debates started at 8 pm (20:00) and ended at 10 pm (22:00), with a break between 9 pm (21:00) and 9.15 pm.
Total amount of tweets sent during the time of the debateComments: The figure shows all the tweets in our dataset sent between two hours before the debate and one hour after. The debates started at 8 pm (20:00) and ended at 10 pm (22:00), with a break between 9 pm (21:00) and 9.15 pm.

Figure 2

Timing and frequency of issue discussion on Twitter during the party leaders’ debates in October 2013 and May 2014Comments: The upper panel shows data from the October 2013 debate and the lower panel data from the May 2014 debate.
Timing and frequency of issue discussion on Twitter during the party leaders’ debates in October 2013 and May 2014Comments: The upper panel shows data from the October 2013 debate and the lower panel data from the May 2014 debate.

Coding of political issues discussed in the debates

Policy dimensionIssueTopics discussed
Left/rightEconomy and labour marketThe state’s economy and labour market (e.g. unemployment, budget deficit, taxes)
Left/rightSchoolEducational attainment, school performance, private schools and profits, class sizes, grades etc.
Left/rightHealthcareQueues, waiting times, reduced capacity, care for the elderly etc.
GAL/TANLaw and order; DefenceCrime, rape, crime prevention and penalties, safety policy, military capability, Ukraine, Russia, Swedish fighter planes, NATO
GAL/TANEnvironmentClimate change, CO2 emissions, renewable energy, UN negotiations
GAL/TANImmigration; Open bordersCommon asylum rules within the EU, refugee crisis, EU migration, begging, labour migration

Issue discussions in the televised debate and frequency in tweets

Percentage of debating time spent discussing the issuePercentage of debate-related tweets mentioning the issueDifference between relative debating time and tweet volume
October 2013
Healthcare1412 (1,168)- 2
Labour market3136 (3,549)+5
Climate139 (939)-4
Refugees129 (933)-3
School1724 (2,437)+6
Crime149 (937)-5
Total100100 (10,023)
May 2014
Defence1510 (2,167)-5
Open borders1621 (4,416)+5
Labour market2835 (7,224)+7
School1620 (4,174)+4
Healthcare136 (1,296)-7
Climate127 (1,486)-5
Total100100 (20,763)

Relative salience of political discussions grouped by policy dimension

Percentage of time devoted to policy dimension during the televised debatePercentage of debate-related tweets mentioning policy dimensionDifference between relative debating time and tweet volume
October 2013
GAL/TAN (climate; refugees; crime)3927-12
Left/Right (labour market; healthcare; school)6172+11
May 2014
GAL/TAN (climate; open borders; defence)4338-5
Left/Right (labour market; healthcare; school)5761+4
eISSN:
2001-5119
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
2 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Social Sciences, Communication Science, Mass Communication, Public and Political Communication
RSS Feed de la revue