[
Aberbach, J. D., Derlien, H. U., Mayntz, R., & Rockman, B. A. (1990). American and German federal executives-technocratic and political attitudes. International Social Science Journal, 42(123), 3-16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Banaji, M. R., & Heiphetz, L. (2010). Attitudes. In Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1, 5th ed. (s. 353-393). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berggren, N., Jordahl, H., & Stern, C. (2009). The political opinions of Swedish social scientists. Finnish Economic Papers, 22(2), 75-88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonica, A., Chilton, A. S., & Sen, M. (2016). The political ideologies of American lawyers. Journal of Legal Analysis, 8(2), 277-335. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lav011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bouckaert, G., Nakrošis, V., & Nemec, J. (2011). Public administration and management reforms in CEE: Main trajectories and results. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 4(1), 9-29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bovens, M., & Wille, A. (2017). Diploma democracy: The rise of political meritocracy. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1191-1205.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Çokgezen, M. (2013). Attitudes of Turkish students towards markets: Are they different from their western counterparts? European Journal of Law and Economics, 43(2), 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0657-013-9385-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Denzler, S., & Wolter, S. C. (2017). Does political orientation affect the choice of a university major? Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1868-1881. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1285878
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2014). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525xl4000430
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elchardus, M., & Spruyt, B. (2009). The culture of academic disciplines and the sociopolitical attitudes of students: A test of selection and socialization effects. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.l540-6237.2009.00626.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Emmerson, D. K. (Ed.) (1968). Students and politics in developing nations. Praeger.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, M., Kauder, B., Potrafke, N., & Ursprung, H. (2015). Does the field of study influence students’ political attitudes? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2686439
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, M., Kauder, B., Potrafke, N., & Ursprung, H. W. (2017). Support for free-market policies and reforms: Does the field of study influence students’ political attitudes? European Journal of Political Economy, 48, 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.07.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gandal, N., Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2005). Personal value priorities of economists. Human Relations, 58(10), 1227-1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/-0018726705058911
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guimond, S., & Palmer, D. L. (1990). Type of academic training and causal attributions for social problems. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200106
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanson, J. M., Weeden, D. D., Pascarella, E. T., & Blaich, C. (2012). Do liberal arts colleges make students more liberal? Some initial evidence. Higher Education, 64(3), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0734-011-9498-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harring, N. (2016). Reward or Punish? Understanding Preferences toward Economic or Regulatory Instruments in a Cross-National Perspective. Political Studies, 64(3), 573-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12209
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harring, N., Davies, P., & Lundholm, C. (2017). Learning Economics and Attitudes to Market Solutions to Environmental Problems. Education Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harring, N., & Jagers, S. C. (2018). Why do people accept environmental policies? The prospects of higher education and changes in norms, beliefs and policy preferences. Environmental Education Research, 24(6), 791-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1343281
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harring, N., Lundholm, C., & Torbjörnsson, T. (2017). The Effects of Higher Education in Economics, Law and Political Science on Perceptions of Responsibility and Sustainability. In W. Leal Filho, L. Brandli, P. Castro, & J. Newman (Eds.), Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Volume 1 (pp. 159-170). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47868-5_10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hellmich, S. N. (2019). Are people trained in economics “Different,” and if so, why? A literature review. The American Economist, 64(2), 246-268. https://doi.org/-10.1177/0569434519829433
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hellmich, S. N. (2020). Social psychological aspects of “making” economists: A review of the nature versus nurture debate. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 19(1), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173420908068
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hirschman, D., & Berman, E. P. (2014). Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics. Socio-Economic Review, 12(4), 779-811. https://doi.org/-10.1093/ser/mwu017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hitlin, S., & Pinkston, K. (2013). Values, attitudes, and ideologies: Explicit and implicit constructs shaping perception and action. In Handbook of social psychology, 2nd ed. (pp. 319-339). Springer Science + Business Media, https://doi.org/-10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Howlett, M. (2009). Policy advice in Multi-Level governance systems: Sub-National policy analysts and analysis. International Review of Public Administration, 13(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2009.10805127
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hutchings, V. L. (2008). Attitudes, Political. In W. A. Darity Jr. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 202-204). Macmillan Reference USA; Gale eBooks. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3045300132/-GVRL?u=karlova&sid=bookmark-GVRL&xid=f70b24d2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kay, A. (2008). Economism and public policy. In P. Kennett (Ed.), Governance, globalization and public policy (pp. 19-35). Edward Elgar.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Little, Brown and Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klein, D., & Stern, C. (2006). Political Scientists’ Policy Views and Voting. The Political Science Reviewer, 35,416-425.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klein, D. B., Stern, C., & Western, A. (2005). Political diversity in six disciplines. Academic Questions, 18(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12129-004-1031-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kovač, P. (2019). Principles of administrative procedure in selected CEE countries: Between national legacies and European trends. Public Administration in a Democratic Society, International Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, October 3-6. https://iju.hr/ipsa/2019/papers/ipl9p2.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kreber, C. (Ed.). (2009). The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leavis, F. R. (2013). The Two Cultures? Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1998). The study of policy instruments: Four schools of thought. In B. G. Peters & F. K. M. van Nispen (Eds.), Public policy instruments: Evaluating the tools of public administration (pp. 33-45). Edward Elgar.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/-10.1017/s0143814x00007960
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linder, S. H, & Peters, B. G. (1992). The study of policy instruments. Policy Currents, 2(2), 1-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lipset, S. M. (1982). The academic mind at the top: The political behavior and values of faculty elites. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46(2), 143-168. https://doi.org/-10.1086/268710
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maio, G. R., Olsen, J. M., Bernard, M. M., & Luke, M. A. (2003). Ideologies, values, attitudes, and behavior. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 283-308). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcetic, G., Novak, G. L., & Dzinic, J. (2013). Public administration education in twelve post-socialist countries and Croatia: Is there a convergence. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 13, 123-160.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mariani, M. D., & Hewitt, G. J. (2008). Indoctrination U.? Faculty ideology and changes in student political orientation. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41(04), 773-783. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096508081031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazur, S. (2020). Public Administration in Central Europe. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2009). Varieties of legacies: A critical review of legacy explanations of public administration reform in East Central Europe. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(3), 509-528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309337670
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2010). In search of the shadow of the past: Legacy explanations and administrative reform in post-communist East Central Europe. In Tradition and public administration (pp. 203-216). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millar, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1989). The effects of affective-cognitive consistency and thought on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(89)90012-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nakhaie, R., & Adam, B. (2008). Political affiliation of Canadian professors. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 873-898. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs1036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peters, B. G. (2015). Advanced introduction to public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pevcin, P., Špaček, D., & Klimovský, D. (2019). Public administration education in the CEE countries: How has it developed during the recent decades? NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 12(2), 217-232. https://doi.org/-10.2478/nispa-2019-0020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piatak, J. S., Douglas, J. W., & Raudla, R. (2020). The role perceptions of government professionals: The effects of gender, educational field, and prior job sector. Public Management Review, 22(10), 1515-1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/-14719037.2019.1642949
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Putnam, R. D. (1977). Elite Transformation in Advanced Industrial Societies: An Empirical Assessment of the Theory of Technocracy. Comparative Political Studies, 10(3), 383-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407701000305
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raudla, R., Douglas, J. W., & Mohr, Z. (2021). Exploration of the technocratic mentality among European civil servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0020852321996421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852321996421
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rhoads, S. E. (1978). Economists and policy analysis. Public Administration Review, 38(2), 112-120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Snow, C. P. (2012). The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stigler, G. (1959). The Politics of Political Economists. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73(4), 522-532. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stubager, R. (2008). Education effects on authoritarian-libertarian values: A question of socialization. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00196.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tourangeau, R., & Galešić, M. (2008). Conceptions of attitudes and opinions. The SAGE handbook of public opinion research, 141-154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verheijen, T., & Connaughton, B. (2003). Public administration education and europeanization: Prospects for the emancipation of a discipline? Public Administration, 81(4), 833-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00373.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Veselý, A. (2021). Autonomy of policy instrument attitudes: Concept, theory and evidence. Policy Sciences, 54(2), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09416-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Veselý, A., & Petrúšek, I. (2020). Decision makers’ preferences of policy instruments. European Policy Analysis, 7(1), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1082
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weisenfeld, U., & Ott, I. (2011). Academic discipline and risk perception of technologies: An empirical study. Research Policy, 40(3), 487-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.107.1.101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolff, J., & Dirk, H. (2006). Economism and its limits. In M. Moran, R. E. Goodin, & M. Rein (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 746-770). Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
