[
Ackrill, R., Kay, A., & Zahariadis, N. (2013). Ambiquity, multiple streams, and EU policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 871-887.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bachelard, G. (1978). Le novel esprit scientique (14th ed.). Presses Universitaires se France.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bunge, M. (2004). How Does It Works for Explanatory Mechanism? Philosophy of the Social Science 34, 182-210.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cairney, P., & Jones, M. D. (2016). Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of This Universal Theory? Policy Studies Journal, 44, 37-58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carter, N. & Jacob, M. (2014). Explaning radical policy change: the case of climate change and energy policy under the British labour government 2006-10. Public Administration, 92(1), 125-141.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang, S.-N., & Chiu, M.-H. (2008). Lakatos’ Scientific Research Programmes as a Framework for Analysing Informal Argumentation about Socio-scientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1753-1773.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2009). Simplicity and reality in computational modeling of politics. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 15, 26-46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Copeland, P., & Scott, J. (2014). Policy windows, ambiguity and Commission entrepreneurship: explaining the relaunch of the European Union’s economic reform agenda. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 1-19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elman, C., & Elman, M. F. (2002). How not to be Lakatos intolerant: Appraising progress in IR research. International Studies Quarterly, 46, 231-262.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engler, F., & Herweg, N. (2019).Of Barriers to Entry for Medium and Large n Multiple Streams Applications: Methodological and Conceptual Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 47, 905-926.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erdin, H. O. (2020). Appraisal of certain methodologies in cognitive science based on Lakatos’s methodology of scientific research programmes. Synthese, 199(Suppl 1), 89-112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gold, S. (2014). Supply chain management as Lakatosian research program. Supply Chain Management - an International Journal, 19, 1-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hempel, C. G. (1942). The Function General Laws in History. The Journal of Philosophy, 39(2), 35-48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hempel, C. G. (1958). The theoretician’s dilemma: A study in the logic of theory construction. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herweg, N., Huss, C., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2015). Straightening the Three Streams: Theorizing Extensions of the Multiple Streams Framework. European Journal of Political Research, 54, 435-449.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herweg, N., & Zahariadis, N. (2017). Multiple Streams. In N. Zahariadis, & L. A. Buonanno (eds), The Routledge Handbook of European Public Policy (pp. 17-53). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2017). The Multiple Streams Framework: Foundations, Refinements, and Empirical Applications. In C. M. Weible, & P. A. Sabatier (eds), Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed., pp. 17-53). Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones, M. D., Peterson, H. L., Pierce, J. J., Herweg, N., Bernal, A., Lamberta, H., & Zahariadis, N. (2016). A River Runs through It: A Multiple Streams Meta Review. Policy Studies Journal, 44, 13-36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (1st ed.). Harper Collins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. (2nd ed.). Harper Collins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (2nd ed.). University of Chicago.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakatos, I. (1970). History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1970, 91-136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/495757
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematics Discovery. J. Worrall, & E. Zahar (eds). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakatos, I. (1978a). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, Volume II. J. Worrall, & G. Currie (eds). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakatos, I. (1978b). Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Philosophical Papers, Volume II. J. Worrall, & G. Currie, (eds). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (1970). Criticisms and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceeding of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London 1965, Volume 4. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lehmann, A., & Javidpour, J. (2010). Potential pathways of invasion and dispersal of Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz 1865 in the Baltic Sea. Hydrobiologia, 649, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0750-010-0233-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Little, D. (1991). Varieties of Social Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science. Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meijerink, S. (2006). Understanding policy stability and change: The interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945-2003. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), 1060-1077.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neurath, O. (1931-1932). Soziologie im Physikalismus. Erkenntnis, 1931-1932(2), 393-431.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ochrana, F. (2012). Methodology of Science: Introduction. Karolinum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ochrana, F. (2015). Methodology of Social Science. Karolinum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peters, B. G. (2015). Advanced Introduction to Public Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ochrana, F., & Novotný, V. (2021). Využití metodologie vědeckovýzkumných programů pro hodnocení vědeckovýzkumné činnosti [Using the methodology of scientific research programmes for the evaluation of scientific research activities]. Socioekonomické a humanitní studie, 13(1), 67-86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Popper, K. R. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Potůček, M, Rudolfová, V. & Vlčková, K. 2017. Public Policy: A Comprehensive Introduction. Karolinum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of Chaos; Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ridde, V. (2009). Policy implementation of an African state: an Extension of Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach. Public Administration, 87(4), 938-954.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). (1999a). Theories of the Policy Process (1st ed.). Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). (1999b). The Need for Better Theories. In P. A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (1st ed., pp. 3-17). Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). 2007. Theories of the Policy Process (2nd ed.). Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (eds). 2014. Theories of the Policy Process (3rd ed.). Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silva, S. T. (2009). On evolutionary technological change and economic growth: Lakatos as a starting point for appraisal. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19, 111-135.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thiem, A., Baumgartner, M., & Bol, D. (2016). Still Lost in Translation! A Correction of Three Misunderstandings between Configurational Comparativists and Regressional Analysts. Comparative Political Studies, 49, 742-774.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, T. C. (2010). The Perils of Paradigm Mentalities: Revisiting Kuhn, Lakatos, and Popper. Perspectives on Politics, 8,433-451.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615-635.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (eds). (2017). Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed.). Routledge, Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahariadis, N. (1999). Ambiguity, Time, and Multiple Streams. In P. A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (1st ed., pp. 73-93). Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Manipulation in Democratic Societies. Georgetown University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahariadis, N. (2007). The Multiple Streams Framework: Structure, Limitations, Prospects. In P. A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (2nd ed., pp. 65-92). Westview Press.s
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and Multiple Streams. In P. A. Sabatier, & C. M. Weible (eds), Theories of the Policy Process (3rd ed., pp. 25-58). Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
