1. bookVolume 15 (2022): Edition 1 (June 2022)
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
1338-4309
Première parution
03 Aug 2009
Périodicité
2 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
access type Accès libre

Effectiveness of Administrative Appeal in Slovenia and Croatia – Between National Traditions and EU Standards

Publié en ligne: 14 Jun 2022
Volume & Edition: Volume 15 (2022) - Edition 1 (June 2022)
Pages: 39 - 60
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
1338-4309
Première parution
03 Aug 2009
Périodicité
2 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Abstract

The administrative appeal is a multifunctional legal remedy whose purpose is to protect the rights of the parties vis-à-vis the authorities and provide – through a generalisation of cases – a regulatory feedback loop leading to better sector-specific regulations. The administrative appeal is thus a constitutional guarantee of democratic governance, as well as mechanism of good administration and effective public policies, as long as it is implemented in line with the purpose of regulation. To examine the theoretical and regulatory objectives of the administrative appeal in Slovenia and Croatia and test its compliance with EU trends, a comparative analysis of the key provisions of the systemic laws on the general administrative procedure (APAs) was carried out. In such context, specific effectiveness criteria were developed, focusing on the admissibility, devolution and suspensiveness of the administrative appeal, as well as on the duration of the administrative appeal procedure. The achievement of the regulatory objectives of the APAs in both countries was further examined through interviews with experts in administrative procedural law and, for Slovenia, through an analysis of administrative case law. The finding suggest that the most challenging issues are the (non-)suspensiveness of the appeal and the duration of procedure. Hence, the administrative appeal may well be a fairly suitable safeguard of the constitutional rights of the parties in individual cases, but on a systemic level, its potential for good administration is not fully exploited. This instrument should therefore be further developed, e.g., through a mutatis mutandis application of the APA in all administrative acts and an even more consistent application in the most disputable administrative procedures, particularly in terms of the suspension of enforcement pending administrative finality and the still reasonably long procedures.

The key points for practitioners are: • The administrative appeal has various functions, such as protecting international and constitutional safeguards of the parties to the procedure and ensuring a coherent administrative-legal system; • In the EU, procedural issues in individual Member States can largely be regulated autonomously; however, there are certain characteristics necessary to define the appeal as an effective tool; • Slovenia and Croatia regulate the administrative procedure in a rather similar way, yet there are some crucial differences in effectiveness of the administrative appeal both in law and, particularly, in practice; • Experts, especially from the CEE region, can learn about the gap between theory and practice in the selected countries, which enables them to compare other similar national systems in line with the EU standards.

Keywords

Auby, J.-B. (ed.). (2014). Codification of Administrative Procedure. Bruylant. Search in Google Scholar

Avbelj., M. (ed.). (2019). Komentar Ustave Republike Slovenije [Commentary to the Constitution of Republic of Slovenia]. New University, Nova Gorica, European Law Faculty. Search in Google Scholar

Dragos, D. C., & Neamtu, B. (eds). (2014). Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-34946-1 Search in Google Scholar

Đanić Čeko, A., & Kovač, P. (2020). Comparative Analysis of an Administrative Appeal in Croatian, Slovenian and EU law. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC), 4, 1065–1096. https://doi.org/10.25234/-eclic/11940 Search in Google Scholar

Galetta, D.-U., Hofmann, H. C. H., Puigpelat, M. O, & Ziller, J. (2015). The General Principles of EU Administrative Procedural Law. European Parliament. Search in Google Scholar

Codec, R. (ed.). (1993). Upravni zbornik [Administrative Compendium], Institute of Public Administration at the Ljubljana Faculty of Law. Search in Google Scholar

Gruden, B., Kovač, P., & Stare, J. (2008). The Management of Complaints in Slovene Public Administration. Organization, 41(1), 22–29. Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, H. C. H., Schneider, J.-P., & Ziller, J. (eds). (2014). The ReNEUAL Model Rules. ReNEUAL. www.reneual.eu. Search in Google Scholar

Janderová, J. (2019). Impact of the Rule of Law as a Fundamental Public Governance Principle on Administrative Law Interpretation in the Czech Republic. Central European Public Administration Review, 17(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/-10.17573/cepar.2019.2.0610.17573/cepar.2019.2.06 Search in Google Scholar

Kekez, A. (2018). Public Service Reforms and Clientelism: Explaining Variation of Service Delivery Modes in Croatian Social Policy. Policy and Society, 37 (3), 386-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.143650510.1080/14494035.2018.1436505 Search in Google Scholar

Kerševan, E. (2016). The principle of effective legal protection in administrative law in Slovenia. In Z. Szente (ed.), The principle of effective legal protection in administrative law: A European comparison (pp. 266–280). Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Khadzhyradieva, S., Slukhai, S., & Rachynskyi, A. (2020). Public Administration in Ukraine: Adjusting to European Standards. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 13 (1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-000410.2478/nispa-2020-0004 Search in Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, C., Novitz, T., & Skidmore, P. (2000). The Future of Remedies in Europe. Hart. Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, I. (2005). Administrative Procedures on the Territory of Former Yugoslavia. OECD. Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, I., & Đulabić, V. (eds). (2009). Modernizacija općeg upravnog postupka i javne uprave u Hrvatskoj [Modernisation of General Administrative Procedure and Public Administration]. Institute of Public Administration, Zagreb. Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, I., Kovač, P., Đulabić, V., & Džinić, J. (2016). Legal Remedies in Administrative Procedures in Western Balkans. Regional School of Public Administration. Search in Google Scholar

Kovač, P. (2013). Effective Adjudication through Administrative Appeals in Slovenia. Utrecht Law Review, 9(3), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.23510.18352/ulr.235 Search in Google Scholar

Kovač, P. (2019). Pomen in posledice molka organa pri odločanju v upravnih zadevah [Significance and Effects of Administrative Silence in Administrative Matters]. Podjetje in delo, 45(617), 914–929. Search in Google Scholar

Kovač, P., & Kerševan, E. (eds). (2020). Komentar Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku (ZUP), 1. In 2. knjiga [Commentary to the ZUP, Books 1 and 2], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia. Search in Google Scholar

Moldovan, O., & Bucatariu, G. (2019). Effectiveness and Efficiency of Administrative Appeal Procedures: A Case Study on Tax Disputes in Romania. Central European Public Administration Review, 17 (2), 9–33. https://doi.org/-10.17573/cepar.2019.2.0110.17573/cepar.2019.2.01 Search in Google Scholar

Pusić, E. (1989). Društvena regulacija: granice znanosti i izkustva [Societal Regulation: Limits of Science and Experience]. Globus, Faculty of Law. Search in Google Scholar

Randma-Liiv, T., & Drechsler, W. (2017). Three Decades, Four Phases: Public Administration Development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989–2017. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6–7), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-017510.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0175 Search in Google Scholar

Ropret, M., Aristovnik, A., & Kovač, P. (2018). A Content Analysis of the Rule of Law within Public Governance Models: Old vs. New EU Member States. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 11 (2), 129–152. https://doi.org/-10.2478/nispa-2018-001610.2478/nispa-2018-0016 Search in Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Lindseth, P. L. (eds). (2010). Comparative Administrative Law. Elgar.10.4337/9781849808101 Search in Google Scholar

Schuppert, G. F. (2000). Verwaltungswissenschaft (Verwaltung, Verwaltungsrecht, Verwaltungslehre). Nomos. Search in Google Scholar

Sever, T., Đanić Čeko, A., & Kovač, P. (2016). Effective legal protection against the excessive length of administrative decision-making: The cases of Slovenia and Croatia. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 9(1), 135–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-000710.1515/nispa-2016-0007 Search in Google Scholar

Trondal, J., & Peters, G. B. (2013). The Rise of European Administrative Space: Lessons Learned. Journal of European Public Policy, 20 (2), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.74613110.1080/13501763.2013.746131 Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo