Linear Mixed Models: Gum and Beyond

[1] BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. (2008). Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM 1995 with minor corrections). JCGM 100:2008. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[2] ISO. (2005). Measurement uncertainty for metrological applications - repeated measurements and nested experiments. ISO/TS 21749:2005.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Sakurai, H., Ehara, K. (2011). Evaluation of uncertainties in femtoampere current measurement for the number concentration standard of aerosol nanoparticles. Measurement Sience and Technology, 22, 024009.10.1088/0957-0233/22/2/024009Search in Google Scholar

[4] Lee, J., Yang, J., Yang, S., Kwak, J. (2007). Uncertainty analysis and ANOVA for the measurement reliability estimation of altitude engine test. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 21 (4), 664-671.10.1007/BF03026971Search in Google Scholar

[5] Wang, D.Y., Lin, K.-H., Lo Huang, M.-N. (2002). Variability studies on EMI data for electronic, telecommunication and information technology equipment. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 44 (2), 385-393.10.1109/TEMC.2002.1003405Search in Google Scholar

[6] Toman, B. (2006). Linear statistical models in the presence of systematic effects requiring a Type B evaluation of uncertainty. Metrologia, 43 (1), 27-33.10.1088/0026-1394/43/1/004Search in Google Scholar

[7] von Martens, H.-J., Link, A., Schlaak, H.-J., T¨aubner, A., Wabinski, W., G¨obel, U. (2004). Recent advances in vibration and shock measurements and calibrations using laser interferometry. In Sixth International Conference on Vibration Measurements by Laser Techniques: Advances and Applications. SPIE, Vol. 5503, 1-19.Search in Google Scholar

[8] ISO. (1999). Methods for the calibration of vibration and shock transducers - Part 11: Primary vibration calibration by laser interferometry. ISO 16063-11:1999.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Jackett, R.J., Barham, R.G. (2013). Phase sensitivity uncertainty in microphone pressure reciprocity calibration. Metrologia, 50 (2), 170-179.10.1088/0026-1394/50/2/170Search in Google Scholar

[10] Pinheiro, J.C., Bates, D.M. (2000). Mixed-effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1Search in Google Scholar

[11] Searle, S.R., Casella, G., McCulloch, C.E. (1992). Variance Components. John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470316856Search in Google Scholar

[12] Burdick, R.K., Graybill, F.A. (1992). Confidence Intervals on Variance Components. Marcel Dekker.10.1201/9781482277142Search in Google Scholar

[13] West, B.T., Welch, K.B., Gałecki, A.T. (2007). Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. Chapman and Hall/CRC.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Witkovský, V. (2012). Estimation, testing, and prediction regions of the fixed and random effects by solving the Henderson’s mixed model equations. Measurement Science Review, 12 (6), 234-248.10.2478/v10048-012-0033-6Search in Google Scholar

[15] Witkovský, V. (2000). mixed.m - Matlab algorithm for solving Henderson’s mixed model equations. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/200-mixed.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Gelman, A., Hill, J. (2009). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel /Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[17] W¨ubbeler, G., Mickan, B., Elster, C. (2013). Bayesian analysis of sonic nozzle calibration data. In: FLOMEKO 2013: 16th International Flow Measurement Conference, 24-26 September 2013. CEESI.Search in Google Scholar