1. bookVolume 13 (2018): Edition 4 (December 2018)
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2069-8887
Première parution
30 Mar 2015
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Accès libre

Technology acceptance model in e-commerce segment

Publié en ligne: 25 Jan 2019
Volume & Edition: Volume 13 (2018) - Edition 4 (December 2018)
Pages: 1242 - 1256
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2069-8887
Première parution
30 Mar 2015
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais

Barnes, N. G. (2014). “Social commerce emerges as big brands position themselves to turn “follows”, “likes” and “pins” into sales”, American Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 11-18.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R.P. Warshaw, P. R. (1989), “User Acceptance of Computer Technology”, available at http://home.business.utah.edu/actme/7410/DavisBagozzi.pdf, (acessed October 19, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Davis, F. D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptable of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3.10.2307/249008Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2003). “Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses.” Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 139–150.10.1002/mar.10064Search in Google Scholar

Gavurova, B., Bacik, R., Fedorko, R., Nastisin, L. (2018). “The Customer’s Brand Experience in the Light of Selected Performance Indicators in the Social Media Environment.” Journal of Competitiveness, Vol. 10, Issue 2, pp. 72–84.10.7441/joc.2018.02.05Search in Google Scholar

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub D. (2003). “Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust”, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 307.10.1109/TEM.2003.817277Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub D. (2003). “Trust and TAM in Online shopping: An Integfated model”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 51-93.10.2307/30036519Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hassenzhal, M. (2007). “To do or not to do: differences in user experience and retrospective judgments depending on the presence or absence of instrumental goals” Interacting with comuputers, Vol. 19, pp. 429-437.Search in Google Scholar

Hawley, M. (2012). “Differentiating Your Design: A Visual Approach to Competitive”, available at http://semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000029.php, (acessed October 19, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

IDC (2015), Mobile Internet Users to Top 2 Billion Worldwide in 2016, International Data Corporation (IDC), available at: www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS40855515 (accessed 1 July 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Jieun Yu, Imsook Ha, Munkee Choi, and Jaejeung Rho. (2005). “Extending the TAM for a t-commerce.” Inf. Manage, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 965-976.10.1016/j.im.2004.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013). “Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance.” International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 318-332.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.11.006Search in Google Scholar

Lu, B., Fan, W., Zhou, M. (2015). “Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 56, pp. 225-237.Search in Google Scholar

Momani A. M., Jamous, M. (2017). “The Evolution of Technology Acceptance Theories” International Journal of Contemporary Computer Research (IJCCR), Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 51-58.Search in Google Scholar

Mosteller, J., Donthu, N., Eroglu, S. (2014). “The fluent online shopping experience”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 67, No. 11, pp. 2486-2493.Search in Google Scholar

Pappas, I. O. (2018). “User experience in personalized online shopping: a fuzzy-set analysis”, European Journal of Marketing.10.1108/EJM-10-2017-0707Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). “Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?” Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 364–382.Search in Google Scholar

Salonen, V., Karjaluoto, H. (2016). “Web personalization: the state of the art and future avenues for research and practice.” Telematics Inform. Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 1088-1104.10.1016/j.tele.2016.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Salovaara, A., Tamminen, S. (2009). “Accept or appropriate? A design-oriented critique on technology acceptance models”, available at http://www.academia.edu/3314912/Acceptance_or_appropriation_A_design-oriented_critique_of_technology_acceptance_models, (acessed October 19, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Sauro, J. (2013). “How to Benchmark Website Usability”, available at https://www.measuringu.com/blog/benchmark-website-usability.php, (acessed October 19, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Stefko, R., Fedorko, R., Bacik, R. (2016). “Website content quality in terms of perceived image of higher education institution”, Polish Journal Of Management Studies, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 153-163.Search in Google Scholar

Ungerman, O., Dedkova, J., Gurinova, K. (2018). “The Impact of Marketing Innovation on the Competitiveness of Enterprises in the Context of Industry 4.0.” Journal of Competitiveness, Vol. 10, Issue 2, pp. 132-148.10.7441/joc.2018.02.09Search in Google Scholar

Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. (2000). “The Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Studies,” Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204.10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Venkatesh, V., Moms, M. G., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D. (2003). “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425-478.10.2307/30036540Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wang, C., & Zhang, P. (2012). “The evolution of social commerce: the people, management, technology, and information dimensions” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 105-127.Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo