Accès libre

Britholite-(Ce) from the metaluminous granite of SW Egypt

À propos de cet article

Citez

Introduction

Britholite-group minerals are rare silicates (typically P-bearing), with apatite-type structure and the general chemical formula (REE,Ca)5[(Si,P)4]3(OH,F,Cl) with Si > P, where REE usually include yttrium (Pekov et al. 2007). The minerals currently include (with the exception of the tritomite species) six members: (1) britholite-(Ce), (2) britholite-(Y), (3) fluorbritholite-(Ce), (4) fluorbritholite-(Y), (5) fluorcalciobritholite (Pasero et al. 2010), and (6) calciobritholite (Uher et al. 2015). In the literature, the potential phase “alumobritholite” has been reported (Kudrina et al. 1961). Apart from this report, there is no evidence of elevated contents of Al in the minerals of the britholite group. The chemical compositions of britholite-group minerals vary widely, depending on the environment of formation and reflect complex isomorphic substitutions among britholite endmembers (Zozulya et al. 2019). Britholite-(Ce) is more accessible to hydrolysis than the britholite-(Y) (Yunhua, Lipu 1987) and, upon alteration, decomposes or is transformed into other minerals. Britholite minerals may contain high amounts of La, Ce, Nd (Vilalva et al. 2013), and Th (Orlandi et al. 1989), but they are not considered as a traditional ore representing an economically important source for these elements for these elements.

Britholite-group minerals form at the late- to post- magmatic (pegmatite and hydrothermal) stages particularly in alkaline rocks (Arden, Halden 1999; Delta Ventura et al. 1999; Oberti et al. 2001; Vilalva et al. 2013; Zozulya et al. 2019). Their occurrences in metaluminous types are relatively rare (Macdonald et al. 2013). The author here reports on the unique occurrence of britholite-(Ce) from a metaluminous granite. The granite is part of a 20 km2 intrusive complex in southwestern Egypt.

Site description

The intrusive complex (Fig. 1) crops out in two circular features of ~10 km apart in a sandy plain surrounded by Nubian sandstone that forms the country rocks in the southwestern region of Egypt. It may be linked to the tonalite magma, emplaced in successive phases containing biotite, hornblende or both during the Proterozoic in the region (Sabet 1972; List et al. 1989). The complex of southwestern Egypt is quite different in composition and texture. It comprises four different types of rocks including: (1) granite, (2) granodiorite, (3) tonalite, and (4) monzodiorite (Hassan 2008). These rocks occur in the form of isolated knobs and residual boulders above the Paleozoic-Mesozoic Nubian Formation (Baioumy et al. 2003). The low topographic forms are the remnants of mountains succumbed to desert erosion which is evident from the abundant igneous rock debris and soils in the area. The soil is a fine to medium grained, reddish, thick deposit consisting of quartz, albite, illite, hematite, and trace biotite.

Figure 1.

Geological map of southwestern Egypt (modified from EGSMA 1981). The region is a hyperarid desert with maximum daily temperatures ranging from 16°C during December to 48°C in June and rains occurring rarely.

The granite of the studied area consists of quartz and feldspars, with minor amounts of biotite and clinochlore (Hassan 2009). It is enriched in total field gamma (γ)- ray radiation (up to seven orders of magnitude more than the general radiation background), but no obvious mineralization. The primary sources of γ-ray radiation are thorium, uranium, and potassium, specifically 232Th, 238U, and 40K decay chains. Most K is concentrated in the feldspars, while uranium and thorium are incorporated in trace rare-metal phases.

Materials and Methods

A hand-held γ-ray counter was used to measure the total gamma ray radiation of the exposed rocks in the field. Two samples of the highly radioactive granite (GR1 and GR2) are used for this research. Polished thin sections were made and studied under plane-polarized (PPL) and cross-polarized transmitted light (XPL) with an Olympus BX41 polarizing microscope. Selected minerals were analyzed using a Hitachi S-4700 Field Emission SEM and Norman Vantage EDS spectrometer at the Institute of Geological Sciences of the Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland. The operating conditions were: (1) accelerating voltage 20 kV, (2) beam current 10 nA, (3) counting time 100 seconds, and (4) a beam diameter of < 1 µm. For each analyzed crystal fragment, several points were randomly measured to ensure its homogeneity. The PRZ (Phi-Rho-Z) correction procedure was employed for raw data before normalizing the EDS results. SEM-EDS precision (standard deviation) determined from duplicate mineral spots from the analyzed samples (Table 1) was good for major elements, but it is unacceptable for trace element analyses.

SEM-EDS analyses (wt%) of duplicate mineral spots (A and B) from GR1 and GR2; BDL—below detecton limit.

A B ± 1σ % Errors
Britholite
SiO2 17.10 15.90 0.60 3.64
ThO 7.00 8.34 0.54 8.73
UO2 BDL BDL
ZrO BDL BDL
Al2O3 7.90 6.82 0.54 7.34
La2O3 13.30 15.10 0.90 6.34
Ce2O3 24.70 26.70 1.00 3.89
Pr2O3 2.20 1.94 0.13 6.28
Nd2O3 5.00 5.15 0.07 1.48
Sm2O3 BDL BDL
Gd2O3 BDL BDL
FeO 8.00 7.58 0.21 2.69
Cr2O3 BDL BDL
MgO 4.30 3.12 0.59 16.0
CaO 5.90 6.50 0.30 4.80
Na2O 1.24 0.65 0.30 31.22
K2O 0.53 0.80 0.13 20.30
P2O5 BDL BDL
SO3 0.27 0.20 0.03 14.89
F 2.51 1.07 0.72 40.28
Total 99.95 99.87
Magnetite
SiO2 2.40 2.40 0.00 0.00
Al2O3 0.60 0.80 0.10 14.28
FeO 93.80 94.70 0.45 0.48
Cr2O3 1.14 0.74 0.20 21.28
MgO 0.30 0.40 0.05 14.29
Na2O 0.70 1.00 0.15 17.65
Total 98.94 100.04
Zircon
SiO2 29.80 28.30 0.75 2.58
ZrO 68.10 67.80 0.15 0.22
Al2O3 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00
FeO 0.70 1.30 0.30 30.00
CaO 0.60 0.30 0.30 33.33
Na2O 0.50 0.90 0.20 28.57
Total 100.0 98.90

Whole-rock chemical elements of GR1 and GR2 were analyzed by an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry at Bureau Veritas Commodities Canada Ltd., Vancouver. The accuracy of the analytical results was monitored using reference materials (STD OREAS45E, STD OREAS24P, STD SO-18, STD DOLOMITE-2). In general, the results for these standard materials were within 5-10% of the accepted values.

Results and Discussion
Microscopy and textural analysis

Samples GR1 and GR2 are light grey, fine to medium grained, and exhibit slightly gneissose texture, where felsic layers are thicker than the mafic ones that constitute thin streaks. The samples are composed of oligoclase + K-feldspars + quartz + biotite, the latter is slightly altered to clinochore. The oligoclase occurs as subidiomorphic to xenomorphic crystals that are partially altered to sericite. The K-feldspar is represented by orthoclase and microcline, some of which exhibit perthitic texture and are partially kaolinitized. Quartz was found as strained crystals showing undulose extinction. Small quartz grains are enclosed in larger plagioclase crystals or form myrimkitic intergrowths around plagioclase boundaries. The accessory minerals found in the two studied samples, in decreasing order of abundance, are: britholite-(Ce) > titanite > zircon > magnetite.

Britholite-(Ce) (Fig. 2) typically occurs as independent crystals in the forms of fine-euhedral rhombic prismatic and platy shapes (200-600 µm in size), with straight to suture edges. In plane polarized light, it exhibits a tan pinkish to light brown color; some grains have a darker orange color. Under cross-polarized light, britholite-(Ce) crystals are heterogeneous and exhibit high relief, dark greenish to brown greenish interference colors. Primary britholite-(Ce) includes magnetite, apatite and zircon and is sometimes included in biotite, leading to the conclusion that it began crystallizing at broadly the same time as biotite, but significantly after feldspars. Several crystals of britholite-(Ce) have slightly concentric zoning and, sometimes, are swelled with spongy texture and resorbed border. The swelling of the crystals indicates that the samples underwent hydration and exchange reactions. Other crystals are intensely fractured, probably due an alteration effect by oxidizing solutions.

Figure 2.

Photomicrographs of samples GR1 and GR2. (A) Image of a britholite prism, taken under XPL. (B) Image of a platy tabular crystal of britholite, taken under XPL. (C-D) Images of a euhedral tabular britholite, taken under PPL and XPL, showing center zonation and a resobed border. (E-F) Images of another euheral britholite, taken under PPL and XPL, showing rims around a core. Mineral abbreviations are: Bt—biotite; Bri—britholite; Mgt—magnetite; Mc—microcline; Pl—plagioclase; Qtz—quartz; Ser—sericite; Zrn—zircon; Ttn—titanite.

Examination of britholite-(Ce) of the samples GR1 and GR2 was made using backscattered electron (BSE) imaging. Typical examples are shown in Figure 3. In BSE images, margins and many parts of the britholite-(Ce) crystals are obscured and, occasionally, are absent, indicating that the crystals are highly altered and decomposed (Fig. 3A, B). Further examination of BSE images reveals that the britholite-(Ce) is made up of smaller grains and fibers with a range of gray shades from white to black (Fig. 3C, D) or it is metamict. Since backscattering increases with increasing atomic number, BSE contrast within a grain is closely related to the distribution of chemical elements (Hall, Lloyd 1981). The change of britholite to another REE phase is seen in BSE images as variations from dark gray to light gray (Fig. 3E, F).

Energy dispersive spectroscopy analyses demonstrate that Ce is predominant over other REE in all of the britholite samples analyzed for this work [Supplementary Electronic Material (SEM) Table S1]. Major elements in the samples (in wt %) are:

Figure 3.

BSE images of REE grains from samples GR1 and GR2. (A) BSE image of the britholite depicted in Fig. 2E, displaying compositional zoning. (B) BSE image of another britholite crystal. In (A) and (B) the dotted red lines partially mark the original crystal outline. (C-D) BSE images of britholite grains with different levels of brightness and, hence, different chemical composition. (E-F) BSE images of britholite partially changed to REE-rich silicate.

∑REE2O = 44.8-66.0, Si2O = 8.9-19.8, CaO = 5.0-13.2, ThO2 = 4.3-10.1, FeO = 1.1-9.6, Al2O3 = 3.0-8.2, MgO = 0.9-5.1, F = 1.2-6.1, Na2O = 0.6-1.8. The FeO, Al2O3, and MgO are generally high compared to reported values for britholite-group minerals from other localities (e.g. Oberti et al. 2001; Pasero et al. 2010; Zozulya et al. 2019). The presence of Fe, Al, and Mg at higher concentions is likely associated with occurrence of microcrystals of clinochlore and/or biotite dispersed within britholite- (Ce) crystals. The britholite-(Ce) analyzed for this study contains significant amounts of Th and U which causes metamictization.

Silica of britholite-(Ce) crystals of samples GR1 and GR2 is negatively correlated with the ∑REE2O (R2 = -0.81). As SiO2 decreases and ∑REE2O increases the primary magmatic britholite-(Ce) changes to another REE-(Ce) phase. The SiO2 and Al2O3 released during the alteration process form a clay mineral that leached out of the britholite or remains in cracks within the parent mineral. Although the alteration may liberate Th and REE from britholite-(Ce), the presence of fluorine in the oxidizing fluids will prevent the elements from long distance transport and result in their precipitation.

Chemical formulae of britholite-(Ce) (SEM Table S1), calculated on the basis of 13 (O,F,Cl), generally deviate from those expected for typical britholite (T = ~3, M = ~5 apfu, respectively; Pasero et al. 2010). Deviations can be attributed to alteration of samples (as also indicated by petrography and BSE imaging) and/or due to analytical errors. The main composition changes observed in britholite-(Ce) in metalminous granites are due to the following substitutions of Si4+ + REE3+ for P5+ + M2+ (Macdonald et al. 2013). The compositions reported in this study and those from literature are evaluated on the basis of these substitutions. The results (Fig. 4A) suggest that the Si4+ + substitution mechanism REE3+ ⇆ P5+ + M2+ occur to the extent of 72%. In the britholite series, the incorporation of both U and Th, amongst others, may be accommodated by the substitution mechanism M2+ + (Th4+,U4+) ⇆ 2 REE3+ (Pan, Flett 2002). The data presented here in Figure 4B suggests that 52% of the variability in the data is controlled by this mechanism.

Figure 4.

Compositions of the analyzed britholite samples in the cationic diagrams (A) P + M2+ versus Si + REE and (B) M2+ + Th + U versus 2REE (n = number of samples; R2, coefficient of determination). The ideal apatite and britholite-(Ce) endmembers are plotted as stars. Symbols: filled rectangular, Vilalva et al. 2013; open triangular, Nash 1972; open rectangular, Orlandi et al. 1989; open circular, Mulluso et al. 2012; filled circulars, Kudrina et al. 1961; filled triangular, this work.

Whole-rock geochemistry

Whole-rock chemical analyses of the granite samples (GR1 and GR2) are given in SEM Table S2, along with the average composition suggested for the upper continental crust (UCC) from Rudnick and Gao (2003). Samples GR1 and GR2 with peralkalinity index (PAI = mol Na2O + K2O/Al2O3) < 1 and aluminum saturation index (ASI = mol Al2O3/((CaO – (3.33*P2O5) + Na2O + K2O) < 1 are metaluminous. In the IUGS quartz-alkali feldspar-plagioclase diagram of the plutonic rocks, they fall in the monzogranite field (Fig. 5). Both GR1 and GR2 are characterized by elevated Th and U. The concentrations of Th vary between ~51 to 52 ppm and U between ~9 to 10 ppm. The Th and U concentrations are enriched in these samples relative to the UCC by factors of ~5 and 3.5, respectively. Hence, the investigated granite is considered fertile for thorium.

Figure 5.

Modal data of the samples GR1 and GR2 plotted on the IUGS quartz-alkaline feldspar-plagioclase diagram of the plutonic rocks.

Thorium and uranium are typically covariant under primary magmatic conditions, due to the charge/ionic similarities between the two elements (U4+: 1.05 A°, Th4+: 1.1 A°). Consequently, primary igneous rocks vary slightly in Th/U ratios, most of the samples filling in the range 3-4 (Keevil, 1944); thus, GR1 and GR2 with relatively high ratios (5.26-5.64) reflect the retention of thorium and the release of uranium. The fractionation between Th and U can occur at weathering surfaces or due to the effect of hydrothermal (magmatic) fluids where the reduced form of uranium (U4+) oxidized, forming soluble and mobile ion (U6+O2)2+, while Th4+ is inoxidizable and, hence, remains behind.

Sample GR1 with total 14 rare earth elements of 297 ppm has a negative Eu anomaly (Eu/Eu* = 0.68; SEM Table S2). Here, the abundance of Eu is depleted relative to the other rare earth elements and this can be taken as evidence for earlier separation of plagioclase. Whole-Rock Eu anomalies are attributed to the tendency of europium to be incorporated in crystallizing plagioclase, which in turns, is controlled by the chemistry of the melt and reduction-oxidation potential. Europium is incompatible in its trivalent oxidation state (Eu3+—1.07 Å) in an oxidizing magma, but it is preferentially incorporated into crystallizing plagioclase in its divalent form (Eu2+—1.25 Å) in a reducing magma, where it replaces calcium (Ca2+—1.0 Å). Thus, the GR1 with the weakly negative Eu anomaly reflects moderate redox conditions and is typical of upper continental crust rocks (Eu/Eu* = 0.67-0.72, SEM Table S2; Tang et al. 2015).

Conclusions

The highly radioactive metalumnious granite of southwestern Egypt, mainly composed of feldspar + quartz + minor biotite + trace clinochlore, contains britholite-(Ce), a light REE-bearing accessory mineral. The britholite-(Ce) occurs as independent prismatic to tabular crystals (< 600 um in size), with considerable amounts of La, Ce, Pr, Nd, and Th. Its crystallization, as suggested from textural features, likely started at approximately the same time as biotite, but significantly after feldspars. Textural and composition data indicate the primary magmatic britholite- (Ce) undergone extensive alteration and chemical modifications.

eISSN:
1899-8526
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
Volume Open
Sujets de la revue:
Geosciences, Geophysics, other