Marketing for Science Based Organizations Perspectives and Questions

1. American Marketing Association (2018). https://www.ama.org/AboutAMA/Pages/Definition-of-Marketing.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

2. Data Market (December 5, 2018). DataMarket: https://datamarket.com/data/set/1xdu/gdp-per-capita-constant-us-millions#!ds=1xdu!208h=1g&display=lineSearch in Google Scholar

3. Drucker, P. (2008). The Five Most Important Questions You Will Ever Ask about Your Organization. San Francisco, California: Jossey-BassSearch in Google Scholar

4. Drucker, P. (1973 & 1985). Management: Revised Edition. New York: HarperCollins.Search in Google Scholar

5. Dubinskas, F. (1988). Janus Organizations: Scientists & Managers. Making Time: Ethno graphics of High Technology Organizations.Search in Google Scholar

6. Folger, J. (August 29, 2012). The ROI of Space Exploration. Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0812/the-roi-of-space-exploration.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

7. Fowler, W. (July 21, 2014). Anniversary Shows US that NASA and Space Exploration are Worth Their Costs. UT News, https://news.utexas.edu/2014/07/21/anniversary-shows-us-that-nasa-and-space-exploration-are-worth-their-costsSearch in Google Scholar

8. Ghemawat, P. (March 1985). Building Strategy on the Experience Curve. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/1985/03/building-strategy-on-the-experience-curveSearch in Google Scholar

9. Henderson, B. (1973). The Experience Curve Reviewed. Perspectives. Boston: Boston Consulting Group, https://www.bcg.com/documents/file13904.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

10. Kroll, L.& Dolan, K. (March 6, 2018). Meet the Members of the Three-Comma Club -The 2018 List. Forbes Magazine.Search in Google Scholar

11. Levitt, T. (July August 1960). Marketing Myopia. Harvard Business Review, 38, 45–56.10.1016/S0007-6813(60)80044-4Search in Google Scholar

12. Lovelock, C. & Wirtz, J. (2011). Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

13. Romer, P. (October 1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98, no. 5, S71-S102.10.1086/261725Search in Google Scholar

14. Solow, R. (August 1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 312-320.10.2307/1926047Search in Google Scholar

15. Stevens, G. & Burley, J. (1997). 3,000 raw ideas = 1 commercial success! Research-Technology Management, 40:3, 16-27, DOI: 10.1080/08956308.1997.1167112610.1080/08956308.1997.11671126Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Stirone, S. (November 4, 2015). The Real Cost of NASA Missions. Popular Science, https://www.popsci.com/real-cost-nasa-missionsSearch in Google Scholar

17. Von Hippel, E. (July 1976). The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process. Research Policy 5, no. 3, 212–239, doi:10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028.7.10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028.7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Wang, J. (October 8, 2018). Scholar becomes 91st person associated with UChicago to receive Nobel Prize. UChicago News: https://news.uchicago.edu/story/economist-paul-romer-sb77-phd83-wins-share-nobel-prizeSearch in Google Scholar

19. Wartzman, R. & Crosby, L. (December 3, 2018). Under the Hood of the Management Top 250. Wall Street Journal, p. R2 & R4-R6.Search in Google Scholar

20. Zehner, W., Williams, C. & Pletcher, G. (August, 2016). Technology Creates 21st Century Wealth - Processes, Problems, and Prognosis. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations Journal, vol. 20, 2, 17–38, https://doi.org/10.14611/minib.20.03.2016.08Search in Google Scholar

21. Zehner, B. & Pletcher, G. (October 2017). Successful Technology Commercialization — Yes or No — Improving the Odds. The Quick Look Methodology and Process. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organization, vol. 25, 81—101, https:doi.org/10.14611/minib.25.09.2017.13Search in Google Scholar