Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Miscellanea Geographica
Édition 23 (2019): Edition 1 (January 2019)
Accès libre
Modified, threshold-based circulation type classification for Central Europe, on the basis of Lityński’s classification
Kinga Kulesza
Kinga Kulesza
| 31 janv. 2019
Miscellanea Geographica
Édition 23 (2019): Edition 1 (January 2019)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Publié en ligne:
31 janv. 2019
Pages:
53 - 62
Reçu:
24 avr. 2018
Accepté:
11 oct. 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0033
Mots clés
Atmospheric circulation
,
circulation type classification
,
threshold-based classification
,
Litynski
,
Central Europe
© 2019 Kinga Kulesza, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
Example of a spatial domain for the Lityński-based circulation type classification.Source: own elaboration.
Figure 2
The thresholds for the classes of the indices Wp (a), Ws (b) and Cp (c) for 16 January 1948-2015. ORG_u – the upper threshold for the ORG classification; NEW_u – the upper threshold for the NEW classification; MOD20_u – the upper threshold for the MOD20 classification; ORG_I – the lower threshold for the ORG classification; NEW_I – the lower threshold for the NEW classification; and MOD20_I – the lower threshold for the MOD20 classification.Source: own elaboration.
Figure 3
The value distribution of the Wp, Ws, and Cp indices for January (JAN), April (APR), July (JUL), and October (OCT) 1986-2015. Vertical dashed lines denote the class thresholds according to the formula x̄ ±0.433σ (the NEW1 variant); vertical continuous lines denote the class thresholds according to the percentiles 33 and 67 (the MOD30 variant). Variant names are explained in the text.Source: own elaboration.
Figure 4
Deviations (%) of the frequencies of individual classes for the indices Wp (a), Ws (b), and Cp (c) from the theoretical equally-likely frequency (where the frequency of each class equals 33.33%), in individual classification variants. Variant names are explained in the text.Source: own elaboration.
Figure 5
Mean absolute error (MAE) for the sub-variants MOD5, MOD10, MOD15, MOD20, MOD25, MOD30, and MOD35 at different periods of time on which the class thresholds are calculated. Variant names are explained in the text.Source: own elaboration.
Figure 6
Atmospheric circulation types determined using the ORG and MOD20 classifications in comparison with synoptic charts for selected days at 12:00 UTC. Variant names are explained in the text.Source: own work on the basis of synoptic charts obtained from: Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut 2018.
Mean absolute error (MAE) for the different variants of the classification algorithm. Variant names are explained in the text.
Variant
ORG
NEW
NEW1
MOD30
MAB (pp)
1.82
1.05
1.01
0.74
The matrix of agreement between the results of individual classification schemes (%). Variant names are explained in the text.
ORG
89.3
NEW
88.0
95.6
NEW1
84.9
91.1
93.0
MOD30
80.9
86.3
87.6
89.2
MOD20
Aperçu