[
1. Al-Muhaini, M., & Heydt, G.T.A. (2013). Novel Method for Evaluating Future Power Distribution System Reliability. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28 (3), 3018–3027. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2230195.10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2230195
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Schuerger, R., Arno, R., & Dowling, N. (2016). Why Existing Utility Metrics Do Not Work for Industrial Reliability Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 52 (4), 2801–2806. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2016.2551696.10.1109/TIA.2016.2551696
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Kavousi-Fard, A., Niknam, T., Akbari-Zadeh, M., & Dehghan, B. (2014). Stochastic Framework for Reliability Enhancement Using Optimal Feeder Reconfiguration. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 25 (5), 901–910. doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2014.00104.10.1109/JSEE.2014.00104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Samuelsson, O., Hemmingsson, M., Nielsen, A.H., Pedersen, K.O.H., & Rasmussen, J. (2006). Monitoring of Power System Events at Transmission and Distribution Level. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 21 (2), 1007–1008. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.873014.10.1109/TPWRS.2006.873014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Zheng, L., Hu, W., Min, Y., & Ma, J. (2018). A Novel Method to Monitor and Predict Voltage Collapse: The Critical Transitions Approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33 (2), 1184–1194. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2737465.10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2737465
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Anagnostou, G., Boem, F., Kuenzel, S., Pal, B.C., & Parisini, T. (2018). Observer-Based Anomaly Detection of Synchronous Generators for Power Systems Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33 (4), 4228–4237. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2771278.10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2771278
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Ye, H., Song, W., Ruan, Z., & Yan, Y. (2019). Current control methods for dual three-phase permanent magnet synchronous motors considering machine parameter asymmetry. In: 22nd International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), (pp. 1–6), 11–14 August 2019, Harbin, China. doi: 10.1109/ICEMS.2019.8921516.10.1109/ICEMS.2019.8921516
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Barzilai, J., & Borwein, J.M. (1988). Two-Point Step Size Gradient Methods. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 8 (1), 141–148. doi:10.1093/imanum/8.1.141.10.1093/imanum/8.1.141
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Salimin, R. H., Binti Abd Kadir, S.H., Mohd, S.R., Baki, S., & Ismail, F. Parameter identification of three-phase induction motor using MATLAB-simulink. In: IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), (pp. 647–651), 3–4 June 2013, Langkawi. doi: 10.1109/PEOCO.2013.6564627.10.1109/PEOCO.2013.6564627
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Parsley, G.M.J., Meyer, A.S., & Landy, C.F. (1993). The prediction of the commutation performance of direct current machines using a combination of magnetic finite element analysis and the principles of generalised machine theory. In: 1993 Sixth International Conference on Electrical Machines and Drives (Conf. Publ. No. 376), (pp. 38–43), Oxford, UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Ivanov-Smolensky, A. V. (1980). Electrical Machines. Moscow: Energy.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Kopylov, I.P. (2001). Mathematical Modeling of Electrical Machines. Moscow: Higher school.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Morgan, A.T. (1979). General Theory of Electrical Machines. Bristol: Heyden.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Adkins, B., & Harley, R.G. (1979). The General Theory of Alternating Current Machines. London: Chapman and Hall.10.1007/978-94-009-5802-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. MathWorks. (n.d.) Simulink SimPowerSystems. Available at https://uk.mathworks.com/products/simpower.html
]Search in Google Scholar
