[
1. Michna, J., Ekmanis, J., Zeltins, N., Zebergs, V., & Siemianowicz, J. (2012). Innovation Risk Management in the Rational Energy Use (Part 2). Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 49 (1), 3–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10047-012-0001-910.2478/v10047-012-0001-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Fayyad, U.M., Candel, A., Ario de la Rubia E., Pafka, S., Chong, A., Lee, J-Y. (2017). Benchmarks and Process Management in Data Science: Will We Ever Get Over the Mess? In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 31–32). doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.312099810.1145/3097983.3120998
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Mika, M. (2017). Interoperability Cadastral Data in the System Approach. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 18 (2), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/6830310.12911/22998993/68303
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Dychko, A., Yeremeyev, I., Kyselov, V., Remez, N., & Kniazevych, A. (2019). Ensuring Reliability of Control Data in Engineering Systems. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 56 (6), 57–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2019-003510.2478/lpts-2019-0035
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Dychko, A., Remez, N., Kyselov, V., Kraychuk, S., Ostapchuk, N., Kniazevych, A. (2020). Monitoring and Biochemical Treatment of Wastewater. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 21 (4), 150–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/11981110.12911/22998993/119811
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Johnston, M., & Kazemzadeh, E. (2018). U.S. Patent No. 10,114,612. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. Elsevier.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Zhu, W., Sun, W., & Romagnoli, J. (2018). Adaptive k-Nearest-Neighbor Method for Process Monitoring. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57 (7), 2574–2586. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0377110.1021/acs.iecr.7b03771
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Diduk, N.N. (2014). The Measures of Internal and External Information (on Example of Probabilistic Situations of Uncertainty). Part IV. System Research and Information Technologies, 1, 113–129.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Jurasz, J., Piasecki, A., & Kaźmierczak, B. (2019). Sewage Volume Forecasting on a Day-Ahead Basis – Analysis of Input Variables Uncertainty. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20 (9), 70–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/11250710.12911/22998993/112507
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Pichler, M., Boreux, V., Klein, A., Schleuning, M., & Hartig F. (2019). Machine Learning Algorithms to Infer Trait-Matching and Predict Species Interactions in Ecological Networks. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 281–293. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.1332910.1111/2041-210X.13329
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Minhas, R., Kleer, J., Matei, I., Bhaskar, S., Janssen, B., Bobrow, D.G. & Kurtoglu, T. (2014). Using fault augmented modelica models for diagnostics. In Proceedings of the 10th International Modelica Conference 2014 (pp. 437–445), 10-12 March 2014, Lund, Sweden. Linkping University Electronic Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp1409643710.3384/ecp14096437
]Search in Google Scholar
