Average Word Length from the Diachronic Perspective: The Case of Arabic

[1] Mendenhall, T.C., 1887. The characteristic curves of composition. Science, 9(214), 237–249.10.1126/science.ns-9.214S.237Search in Google Scholar

[2] Elderton, W.P., 1949. A few statistics on the length of English words. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 112(4), 436–445.10.2307/2980766Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chebanow, S.G., 1947. On conformity of language structures within the Indo-European family to Poisson’s law. Comptes rendus de l’Academie de science de l’URSS, 55(2), 99–102.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Grzybek, P., 2007. History and methodology of word length studies. In Grzybek, P. (Ed.), Contributions to the Science of Text and Language. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 15–90.10.1007/1-4020-4068-7_2Search in Google Scholar

[5] Zipf, G.K., 1935. The Psycho-Biology of Language (Vol. ix). Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Menzerath, P., 1928. Über einige phonetische Probleme. In Actes du premier Congres international de linguistes. Leiden: Sijthoff.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Altmann, G., 1980. Prolegomena to Menzerath’s law. Glottometrika, 2(2), 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Altmann, G., 2014. Bibliography: Menzerath’s law. Glottotheory, 5(2), 121–123.10.1515/glot-2014-0008Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bochkarev, V.V., Shevlyakova, A.V., Solovyev, V.D., 2015. The average word length dynamics as an indicator of cultural changes in society. Social Evolution & History, 14(2), 153–175.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Chen, H., Liu, H., 2014. A diachronic study of Chinese word length distribution. Glottometrics, 29, 81–94.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chen, H., Liang, J., Liu, H., 2015. How does word length evolve in written Chinese? PLoS One, 10(9), e0138567.10.1371/journal.pone.0138567Search in Google Scholar

[12] Zemánek, P., Milička, J., 2014. Quotations, relevance and time depth: medieval Arabic literature in grids and networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature (CLFL), pp. 17–24.10.3115/v1/W14-0903Search in Google Scholar

[13] Zemánek, P., Milička, J., 2017. Words Lost and Found. The Diachronic Dynamics of the Arabic Lexicon. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Chennoufi, A., Mazroui, A., 2016. Impact of morphological analysis and a large training corpus on the performances of Arabic diacritization. International Journal of Speech Technology, 19(2), 269–280.10.1007/s10772-015-9313-5Search in Google Scholar

[15] Milička, J., 2015. Teorie komunikace jakožto explanatorní princip přirozené víceúrovňové segmentace textů [The Theory of Communication as an Explanatory Principle for the Natural Multilevel Text Segmentation]. PhD thesis, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kanwal, J., Smith, K., Culbertson, J., et al., 2017. Zipf’s law of abbreviation and the principle of least effort: language users optimise a miniature lexicon for efficient communication. Cognition, 165, 45–52.10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[17] Piantadosi, S.T., Tily, H., Gibson, E., 2011. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3526–3529.10.1073/pnas.1012551108Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., del Prado Martín, F.M., 2011. Information content versus word length in random typing. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2011(12), L12002.10.1088/1742-5468/2011/12/L12002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Milička, J., 2013, MaWaTaTaRaD, software, available at: <www.milicka.cz/en/mawatatarad/>.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kubát, M., Milička, J., 2013. Vocabulary richness measure in genres. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20(4), 339–349.10.1080/09296174.2013.830552Open DOISearch in Google Scholar