[[1] Lindsay, Peter. The Craft of University Teaching. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2018, pp.104.10.3138/9781487517496]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Charles, Elizabeth. How Teachers Implement Active Learning: Typologies of Orchestrational Flow. International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS), 2019, pp.448.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Lindsay, Peter. The Craft of University Teaching. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2018, pp.90.10.3138/9781487517496]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Lindsay, Peter. The Craft of University Teaching. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2018, pp. 9110.3138/9781487517496]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Clyde, William et al. Using Technology in Teaching. New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 2005, pp. xvii]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Lindsay, Peter. The Craft of University Teaching. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2018, pp. 9010.3138/9781487517496]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Lightbrown, Patsy and Nina Spada. How Languages are Learned. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp.131.]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Simpson, Ormond. Technology-Supported Assessment for Retention. Improving Student Engagement and Development through Assessment. Theory and Practice in Higher Education. Ed. Clouder Broughan, New York, Routledge, 2012, pp.181.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Mueller, Marlies. Interactive Testing: Time to Be a Test Pilot. Interactive Language Teaching. Ed. Wilga M. Rivers. Harvard University. Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp.124]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Lindsay, Peter. The Craft of University Teaching.Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2018, pp.8910.3138/9781487517496]Search in Google Scholar
