Legal Balance between the Human Rights Protection and the Effectiveness of the Criminal Investigation

[1] Papucharova, G. Short profiles of different European Investigation order domestic regulations in the European Union, in: „Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge-based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2“, Land Forces Academy „Nicolae Balcescu”, Sibiu, Romania, Volume 25, Issue 2, 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2019-0075, pp. 169-175.10.2478/kbo-2019-0075Search in Google Scholar

[2] Girginov, A., Voynova, R. Bulgarian-English Handbook on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters, ISBN 978-619-198-068-0, C., Новазвезда, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[3] The so-called Council of Europe Convention of Budapest (CETS № 185) establishes the primary international mechanisms for cooperation in combating and investigating cybercrime by requiring the parties to adopt special legal procedures for obtaining, resp. providing electronic evidence that is not limited to cybercrime.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Such as Art. 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Art.17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Art.8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Art.7-8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1–22).Search in Google Scholar

[6] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88).Search in Google Scholar

[7] Belova, G., Georgieva, G. New Data Protection Development in the EU Judicial and Criminal Area, in: „Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge-based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2“, Land Forces Academy „Nicolae Balchesku”, Sibiu, Romania, Volume 23, Issue 2, 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2017-0103, pp.147-148.10.1515/kbo-2017-0103Search in Google Scholar

[8] Кръстева, Н. Наказателноправназакриланадетето: предизвикателства в съвременнататехнологичнасреда, С.,ВедаСловена-Ж, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[9] See Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 Digital Rights Ireland, Judgment of 8 April 2014, and Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15 Tele2 Sverigeand Tom Watson, Judgment of 21 December 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Stanin, M., Rights within Obligations and Responsibilities, in: „Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge-based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2“, Land Forces Academy „Nicolae Balcescu”, Sibiu, Romania, Volume 22, Issue 2, 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2016-0064, p. 150.10.1515/kbo-2016-0064Search in Google Scholar

[11] See Conclusions of the Council of the European Union on improving criminal justice in cyberspace, ST9579/16.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Procedure numbers of the Proposals of EC:COM/2018/225 final - 2018/0108(COD) and COM/2018/226 final - 2018/0107 (COD).Search in Google Scholar

[13] See Jaloud v. Netherlands (GC), a. no.47708/08: “143. Furthermore, the fact of executing a decision or an order given by an authority of a foreign State is not in itself sufficient to relieve a Contracting State of the obligations which it has taken upon itself under the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882/96, § 40, ECHR 2001-VIII, and K. v. Italy, no. 38805/97, § 21, ECHR 2004-VIII).”Search in Google Scholar

[14] Tosza, S. The European Commission’s Proposal on Cross-Border Access to E-Evidence Overview and Critical Remarks, in: EUCRIM, Issue 4/2018, pp. 212-219.10.30709/eucrim-2018-021Search in Google Scholar

[15] Chankova, D., Voynova, R. Towards New European Regulation for Handling Electronic Evidence, in: US-China Law Review, ISSN: 1548-6605 (Print), 1930-2061 (Online), Volume 15, № 3, 2018, р. 125.10.17265/1548-6605/2018.03.001Search in Google Scholar

[16] See Judgment of the CJEU in Case C-207/16, concerning Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Marin, N., Kovacheva, D., Legal Problems and Decisions in the Cooperation between National Ombudsmen in South-East Europe (Правнипроблеми и решенияприсътрудничествотомеждунационалнитеомбудсмани в ЮгоизточнаЕвропа), сп. Балканистиченфорум, бр. 2/2019 г., ISSN 1310-3970 (Print), 2535-1265 (Online), ЮЗУ„НеофитРилски“, Благоевград, с. 306.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Андонова, Г. Възникване и развитие на престъпността и наказанията в минали и наши дни, в: ел. списание „Право, политика, администрация“, ISSN 2367-4601, Правно-исторически факултет, ЮЗУ “Неофит Рилски“, Благоевград, том 3, бр. 3, 2016 г., с. 2-14.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Stanin, M., The Contemporary Countries in the Conditions of Migratory Multiculturalism, in: „Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge-based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2“, Land Forces Academy „Nicolae Balcescu”, Sibiu, Romania, Volume 23, Issue 2, 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2017-0114, p. 201.10.1515/kbo-2017-0114Search in Google Scholar