A novel method for the determination of isoxazoline derivatives in plasma by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: validation and applicability to screening tests
24 sept. 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 24 sept. 2025
Reçu: 07 mars 2025
Accepté: 17 sept. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2025-0050
Mots clés
© 2025 Paulina Markowska-Buńka et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig 1.

Validation results for total recovery by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of isoxazoline derivatives in plasma from clinically healthy dogs, cats and humans and validation results for matrix effect
Validation test | Dog | Cat | Human | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fluralaner | Sarolaner | Lotilaner | Afoxolaner | Fluralaner | Sarolaner | Lotilaner | Afoxolaner | Fluralaner | Sarolaner | Lotilaner | Afoxolaner | ||
Total recovery (%) | Mean | 13.10 | 13.90 | 10.10 | 13.90 | 11.15 | 14.10 | 9.80 | 13.6 | 12.10 | 13.00 | 11.93 | 10.70 |
SD | 2.10 | 1.80 | 1.18 | 2.00 | 1.43 | 1.12 | 2.50 | 2.20 | 2.90 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 1.10 | |
Matrix effect (%) | Mean | 8.90 | 13.90 | 13.30 | 12.10 | 12.20 | 9.80 | 9.50 | 11.90 | 13.60 | 13.70 | 8.93 | 9.60 |
SD | 1.54 | 1.89 | 1.04 | 2.03 | 2.12 | 2.34 | 2.12 | 1.07 | 1.14 | 2.01 | 1.08 | 1.71 |
Validation results of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of sarolaner in clinically healthy laying hen plasma
Linearity | r2 | I | II | III | IV | V | Mean | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |||
Precision (%) and accuracy (%) | Intra-day, n = 6; 3 replications | LLOQ | LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | ||
Precision | I | 9.67 | 6.07 | 1.67 | 2.34 | 2,04 | ||
Accuracy | 5.00 | 4.67 | 1.35 | 3.86 | 1,36 | |||
Precision | II | 14.48 | 3.87 | 3.95 | 4.22 | 7,49 | ||
Accuracy | 11.67 | 3.00 | 2.67 | 4.66 | 5,16 | |||
Inter-day, n = 18 | Precision | III | 10.95 | 1.79 | 2.08 | 6.71 | 5,10 | |
Accuracy | 6.67 | 1.33 | 1.65 | 7.08 | 3,33 | |||
Precision | 11.70 | 3.91 | 2.57 | 6.02 | 4.88 | |||
Accuracy | 7.78 | 3.00 | 1.89 | 3.33 | 3.28 | |||
Concentration (ng/mL) | S/N | |||||||
LLOQ and LOD | LLOQ overall mean, n = 18 | 1.00 | 91.48 | |||||
LLOQ overall SD, n = 18 | 0.12 | 4.74 | ||||||
LOD overall mean, n = 18 | 0.5 | 4.01 | ||||||
LOD overall SD, n = 18 | 0.36 | 0.02 | ||||||
Sample | Total recovery (%) | |||||||
Total recovery | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 99.78 | |||||
1,500 ng/mL | 96.21 | |||||||
SD | 1 ng/mL | 14.09 | ||||||
1,500 ng/mL | 7.47 | |||||||
Matrix effect (%) | ||||||||
Matrix effect | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 14.40 | |||||
1,500 ng/mL | 6.97 | |||||||
SD | 1 ng/mL | 8.09 | ||||||
1,500 ng/mL | 7.00 | |||||||
Stability test results | ||||||||
Stability | Period (h) | Changes in the concentration of QCs (%) | ||||||
LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | |||||
Working standard, 2°C | 24 | 13.97 | 12.24 | 12.35 | 13.31 | |||
48 | 12.08 | 14.38 | 13.55 | 14.44 | ||||
120 | 7.60 | 2.85 | 11.64 | 3.20 | ||||
Autosampler, 4°C | 168 | 5.02 | 8.81 | 14.90 | 12.42 | |||
24 | 13.51 | 13.93 | 2.30 | 6.93 | ||||
24 | 7.12 | 14.11 | 14.92 | 7.17 | ||||
Freeze and thaw, –75°C | 48 | 9.58 | 12.84 | 4.52 | 3.91 | |||
72 | 12.56 | 13.00 | 12.40 | 14.90 | ||||
480 | 7.16 | 2.30 | 2.66 | 10.25 | ||||
Sample processing, 21°C | 3 | 13.38 | 14.62 | 3.21 | 4.07 |
Results of screening tests (concentrations in ng/mL)
Species | Breed | Fluralaner | Sarolaner | Lotilaner | Afoxolaner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dog | German shepherd | - | 434.6 | - | - |
German shepherd | - | 12.1 | - | - | |
German shepherd | - | - | - | - | |
German shepherd | 414.3 | - | - | - | |
German shepherd | - | - | - | 1.3 | |
German Shepherd | - | 19.0 | - | - | |
German shepherd | 346.5 | - | - | - | |
Yorkshire terrier | - | - | 1.0 | ||
Yorkshire terrier | - | - | - | 1.0 | |
Yorkshire terrier | - | - | - | 1.0 | |
Schnauzer | 388.3 | - | - | - | |
Schnauzer | 76.7 | - | - | - | |
Schnauzer | - | - | - | - | |
Golden retriever | - | - | - | ||
Golden retriever | - | 225.0 | - | - | |
Siberian husky | - | - | - | - | |
Siberian husky | - | 196.0 | - | - | |
Beagle | - | - | - | - | |
Beagle | - | 5.6 | - | - | |
Labrador retriever | - | 100.6 | - | - | |
Cat | European cat | - | - | - | - |
European cat | - | 23.8 | - | - | |
European cat | - | 233.3 | - | - | |
European cat | - | - | - | - | |
European cat | - | - | - | - | |
Persian cat | - | - | - | - | |
Persian cat | - | - | - | - | |
Persian cat | - | - | - | - | |
Persian cat | - | - | - | - | |
Persian cat | - | - | - | - |
Calculation methods and acceptance criteria for parameters for validation of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of isoxazoline derivatives in plasma
Parameter | Acceptance criteria | |
---|---|---|
Linearity | Calibration points | Back-calculated concentrations should be within ± 15% of the nominal concentration, and at least 75% of the calibration points, but no fewer than 6, must fulfil this criterion |
Coefficient of determination (r2) | ≥ 0.99 | |
Relative residuals (Yi) | ||
SD of relative residuals (SYi) | ||
Stability | Stock and working standard | |
Autosampler | ||
Freeze and thaw | ||
Sample processing temperature | ||
Precision (RSD or CV) | ||
Accuracy (deviation) (for at least 5 points per group/day) | ||
LOD | 3 × |
|
LLOQ with accuracy and precision | 6 × |
|
Matrix effect | ||
Total recovery | ||
Selectivity/Specificity | No endogenous peaks in the retention time of the analyte | |
Carry-over | Area of carry-over peaks: ≤ 20% of LLOQ and 5% of IS area |
Validation results of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of lotilaner in clinically healthy laying hen plasma
Linearity | r2 | I | II | III | IV | V | Mean | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |||
Precision (%) and accuracy (%) | Intra-day, n = 6; 3 replications | LLOQ | LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | ||
Precision | I | 14.97 | 1.79 | 3.67 | 4.46 | 7.82 | ||
Accuracy | 11.67 | 1.33 | 2.58 | 6.72 | 5.60 | |||
Precision | II | 7.40 | 4.10 | 4.95 | 5.02 | 4.61 | ||
Accuracy | 5.00 | 3.29 | 3.27 | 7.03 | 3.76 | |||
Inter-day, n = 18 | Precision | III | 6.32 | 2.33 | 5.99 | 8.22 | 1.42 | |
Accuracy | 3.33 | 1.67 | 4.03 | 9.11 | 1.19 | |||
Precision | 9.57 | 2.74 | 4.87 | 5.15 | 4.61 | |||
Accuracy | 6.67 | 2.10 | 3.29 | 4.99 | 3.52 | |||
Concentration (ng/mL) | S/N | |||||||
LLOQ and LOD | LLOQ overall mean, n = 18 | 1.00 | 73.23 | |||||
LLOQ overall SD, n = 18 | 0.09 | 5.95 | ||||||
LOD overall mean, n = 18 | 0.5 | 5.55 | ||||||
LOD overall SD, n = 18 | 0.39 | 2.87 | ||||||
Sample | Total recovery (%) | |||||||
Total recovery | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 95.50 | |||||
1,500 ng/mL | 93.16 | |||||||
SD | 1 ng/mL | 14.76 | ||||||
1,500 ng/mL | 5.07 | |||||||
Matrix effect (%) | ||||||||
Matrix effect | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 14.10 | |||||
1,500 ng/mL | 7.09 | |||||||
SD | 1 ng/mL | 5.98 | ||||||
1,500 ng/mL | 4.51 | |||||||
Stability test results | ||||||||
Stability | Period (h) | Changes in the concentration of QCs (%) | ||||||
LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | |||||
Working standard, 2°C | 24 | 6.32 | 7.40 | 10.90 | 5.91 | |||
48 | 8.24 | 13.25 | 6.07 | 8.71 | ||||
120 | 9.58 | 13.60 | 2.96 | 11.92 | ||||
Autosampler, 4°C | 168 | 8.45 | 14.87 | 11.29 | 12.82 | |||
24 | 13.50 | 13.99 | 9.54 | 14.94 | ||||
24 | 12.30 | 7.27 | 12.88 | 9.35 | ||||
Freeze and thaw, –75°C | 48 | 8.75 | 5.60 | 11.63 | 12.44 | |||
72 | 13.03 | 2.37 | 3.95 | 6.73 | ||||
480 | 13.34 | 11.42 | 11.26 | 9.70 | ||||
Sample processing, 21°C | 3 | 4.21 | 5.42 | 10.18 | 2.61 |
Validation results of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of afoxolaner in clinically healthy laying hen plasma
Linearity | r2 | I | II | III | IV | V | Mean | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |||
Precision (%) and accuracy (%) | Intra-day, n = 6; 3 repetitions | LLOQ | LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | ||
Precision | I | 7.66 | 10.28 | 3.04 | 2.47 | 3.45 | ||
Accuracy | 5.00 | 8.67 | 2.48 | 3.22 | 2.00 | |||
Precision | II | 13.22 | 4.20 | 4.30 | 6.66 | 8.16 | ||
Accuracy | 10.00 | 2.67 | 3.27 | 5.54 | 6.39 | |||
Inter-day, n = 18 | Precision | III | 9.67 | 3.10 | 2.26 | 5.23 | 4.52 | |
Accuracy | 5.00 | 2.67 | 1.60 | 8.02 | 3.65 | |||
Precision | 10.18 | 5.86 | 3.20 | 6.07 | 5.05 | |||
Accuracy | 6.67 | 4.67 | 2.45 | 6.01 | 4.01 | |||
Concentration (ng/mL) | S/N | |||||||
LLOQ and LOD | LLOQ overall mean, n = 18 | 1.00 | 92.30 | |||||
LLOQ overall SD, n = 18 | 0.04 | 4.8 | ||||||
LOD overall mean, n = 18 | 0.5 | 0.9 | ||||||
LOD overall SD, n = 18 | 0.44 | 1.11 | ||||||
Sample | Total recovery (%) | |||||||
Total recovery | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 85.19 | |||||
1,500 ng/mL | 87.05 | |||||||
SD | 1 ng/mL | 14.14 | ||||||
1,500 ng/mL | 7.88 | |||||||
Matrix effect (%) | ||||||||
Matrix effect | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 13.77 | |||||
1,500 ng/mL | 14.69 | |||||||
SD | 1 ng/mL | 9.56 | ||||||
1,500 ng/mL | 10.52 | |||||||
Stability test results | ||||||||
Stability | Period (h) | Changes in the concentration of QCs (%) | ||||||
LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | |||||
Working standard, 2°C | 24 | 5.74 | 3.07 | 4.96 | 1.16 | |||
48 | 14.91 | 14.58 | 12.01 | 14.28 | ||||
120 | 9.82 | 7.82 | 11.76 | 14.80 | ||||
Autosampler, 4°C | 168 | 12.79 | 3.31 | 11.28 | 13.84 | |||
24 | 13.15 | 8.10 | 9.55 | 14.14 | ||||
24 | 10.00 | 12.99 | 6.47 | 3.44 | ||||
Freeze and thaw, –75°C | 48 | 14.10 | 13.78 | 14.05 | 12.39 | |||
72 | 14.84 | 3.12 | 13.48 | 10.89 | ||||
480 | 12.53 | 10.90 | 12.66 | 8.37 | ||||
Sample processing, 21°C | 3 | 5.66 | 14.37 | 13.26 | 13.68 |
Validation results of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of fluralaner in clinically healthy laying hen plasma
Linearity | r2 | I 0.99 | II 0.99 | III 0.99 | IV 0.99 | V 0.99 | Mean 0.99 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precision (%) and accuracy (%) | Intra-day, n = 6; 3 replications | LLOQ | LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | ||
Precision | I | 8.94 | 5.59 | 1.94 | 3.89 | 1.66 | ||
Accuracy | 6.67 | 4.33 | 1.62 | 2.64 | 1.29 | |||
Precision | II | 4.15 | 6.81 | 2.34 | 7.81 | 2.47 | ||
Accuracy | 1.67 | 5.33 | 1.90 | 4.65 | 1,99 | |||
Inter-day, n = 18 | Precision | III | 7.66 | 9.38 | 5.54 | 3.25 | 6.16 | |
Accuracy | 5.00 | 7.33 | 4.60 | 6.01 | 4,87 | |||
Precision | 7.23 | 2.19 | 1.75 | 3.03 | 3.16 | |||
Accuracy | 5.70 | 1.67 | 4.91 | 2.90 | 2.60 | |||
Concentration (ng/mL) | S/N | |||||||
LLOQ and LOD | LLOQ overall mean, n = 18 | 1.00 | 90.00 | |||||
LLOQ overall SD, n = 18 | 0.14 | 5.91 | ||||||
LOD overall mean, n = 18 | 0.5 | 6.22 | ||||||
LOD overall SD, n = 18 | 0.33 | 3.91 | ||||||
Total recovery | Sample | Total recovery (%) | ||||||
Mean | 1 ng/mL | 91.19 | ||||||
1,500 ng/mL | 85.39 | |||||||
SD | 1 ng/mL | 12.73 | ||||||
1,500 ng/mL | 5.94 | |||||||
Matrix effect (%) | ||||||||
Matrix effect | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 10.15 | |||||
1,500 ng/mL | 14.81 | |||||||
SD | 1 ng/mL | 8.22 | ||||||
1,500 ng/mL | 2.94 | |||||||
Stability tests results | ||||||||
Stability | Period (h) | Changes in the concentration of QCs (%) | ||||||
LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | |||||
24 | 13.25 | 3.07 | 4.96 | 1.16 | ||||
Working standard, 2°C | 48 | 8.92 | 14.58 | 12.01 | 14.28 | |||
120 | 13.25 | 10.90 | 9.02 | 12.24 | ||||
168 | 14.31 | 13.95 | 11.15 | 11.10 | ||||
Autosampler, 4°C | 24 | 7.01 | 9.80 | 14.48 | 7.72 | |||
24 | 14.71 | 13.91 | 5.30 | 2.77 | ||||
Freeze and thaw, –75°C | 48 | 14.07 | 14.93 | 12.60 | 4.65 | |||
72 | 12.33 | 14.39 | 13.98 | 13.49 | ||||
480 | 14.49 | 14.77 | 10.30 | 8.52 | ||||
Sample processing, 21°C | 3 | 14.04 | 9.23 | 4.01 | 3.73 |
Selected parameters of ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for the determination of isoxazoline derivatives in plasma
MS/MS parameters | Compound | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fluralaner | Sarolaner | Lotilaner | Afoxolaner | ||
Precursor ions (m/z) | 556.06 | 581.03 | 595.98 | 625.73 | |
Product ions (m/z) | Quantification ions | 457.0 | 457.0 | 439.75 | 469.89 |
Confirmation ions | 400.0 | 415.9 | 166.03 | 195.97 | |
Collision energy (eV) | Quantification ions | 18 | 25 | 30 | 26 |
Confirmation ions | 12 | 20 | 35 | 48 | |
Retention time (min) | 2.55 | 2.55 | 3.33 | 3.18 | |
Capillary voltage (kV) | 3.0 | ||||
Cone voltage (V) | 20 | ||||
Desolvation gas | Nitrogen | ||||
Desolvation gas temperature (°C) | 600 | ||||
Desolvation gas flow (L/h) | 1000 | ||||
Collision gas flow (mL/min) | 0.2 | ||||
Collision gas | Argon | ||||
Source temperature (°C) | 120 | ||||
Electrospray mode | Positive | ||||
Dwell (s) | 0.1 |