Accès libre

Remodelling of the healthy foal’s conjunctival microbiome in the first two months of life

Katarzyna Płoneczka-Janeczko

Katarzyna Płoneczka-Janeczko

Department of Epizootiology with Clinic of Birds and Exotic Animals, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life SciencesWrocław, Poland
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Płoneczka-Janeczko, Katarzyna
, 
Eve Armstrong

Eve Armstrong

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Life ScienceWrocław, Poland
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Armstrong, Eve
, 
Marta Siemieniuch-Tartanus

Marta Siemieniuch-Tartanus

Department of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life SciencesWarsaw, Poland
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Siemieniuch-Tartanus, Marta
 et 
Marcin Magdziarz

Marcin Magdziarz

Hugo Steinhaus Center, Faculty of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Wrocław University of Science and TechnologyWrocław, Poland
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Magdziarz, Marcin
  
31 janv. 2025
Remodelling of the healthy foal’s conjunctival microbiome in the first two months of life's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Publié en ligne: 31 janv. 2025
Pages: 131 - 140
Reçu: 29 mai 2024
Accepté: 20 janv. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2025-0001
Mots clés
© 2025 Katarzyna Płoneczka-Janeczko et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1.

Prevalent bacterial families in foals’ conjunctival microbiota identified in individual animals. 1–6 – individual foals; I – first sampling time point (within 12 h of birth); II – second sampling time point (after the first month of life); III – third sampling time point (after the second month of life)
Prevalent bacterial families in foals’ conjunctival microbiota identified in individual animals. 1–6 – individual foals; I – first sampling time point (within 12 h of birth); II – second sampling time point (after the first month of life); III – third sampling time point (after the second month of life)

Fig. 2.

Prevalent bacterial genera in foals’ conjunctival microbiota identified in individual animals. 1–6 – individual foals; I – first sampling time point (within 12 h of birth); II – second sampling time point (after the first month of life); III – third sampling time point (after the second month of life)
Prevalent bacterial genera in foals’ conjunctival microbiota identified in individual animals. 1–6 – individual foals; I – first sampling time point (within 12 h of birth); II – second sampling time point (after the first month of life); III – third sampling time point (after the second month of life)

Fig. 3.

Box plots presenting Shannon and Simpson indices at the order level. The red line represents the median for all six foals
Box plots presenting Shannon and Simpson indices at the order level. The red line represents the median for all six foals

Fig. 4.

Box plots presenting Shannon and Simpson indices at the family level. The red line represents the median for all six foals
Box plots presenting Shannon and Simpson indices at the family level. The red line represents the median for all six foals

Fig. 5.

Box plots presenting Shannon and Simpson indices at the genus level. The red line represents the median for all six foals
Box plots presenting Shannon and Simpson indices at the genus level. The red line represents the median for all six foals

Fig. 6.

Principal component analysis of the Bray–Curtis distance table on the species level
Principal component analysis of the Bray–Curtis distance table on the species level

P-values of the t-tests applied to compare Shannon and Simpson indices at different time points at the family taxonomic level

I vs. II I vs. III II vs. III
Shannon index 0.0074* 0.3632 0.0998
Simpson index 0.0024* 0.3866 0.0459*

P-values of the t-tests applied to compare Shannon and Simpson indices at different time points at the order taxonomic level

I vs. II I vs. III II vs. III
Shannon index 0.0048* 0.3616 0.0863
Simpson index 0.0058* 0.4607 0.0369*

P-values of the t-tests applied to compare Shannon and Simpson indices at different time points at the genus taxonomic level

I vs. II I vs. III II vs. III
Shannon index 0.0073* 0.3968 0.0907
Simpson index 0.0016* 0.3557 0.0703
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Sciences de la vie, Biologie moléculaire, Microbiologie et virologie, Sciences de la vie, autres, Médecine, Médecine vétérinaire
RSS Feed de la revue